Posted on 07/07/2007 3:53:56 PM PDT by neverdem
That she is.
Bush/Kennedy loved the illegals... that's about it.
this bill taight me that most Hispanic leaders identify with their own group as latinos over other political ideology
scary
the notion that only “whites” should not defend group identity and that many whites willingly accpet that as just is one of history’s weakest moments
Agreed.
18 states have introduced resolutions calling on their federal representatives to halt work on the North American Union (they include Virginia and South Carolina). Three of these states (Idaho, Montana and Oklahoma) have passed their resolutions.
When news of this comes out, it will be impeachment time, then MUCHO prison time (after the tar and feathers) for all the traitors who would destroy America's sovereignty.
I pray for that day!
Thanks for the kind words.
Have you considered relocating? (Only kidding!)
Stay put and do your best to get rid of those two.
Be safe...
No kidding, I have more than considered. It will be done, lol!
It’s not possible to get rid of these jerks; as soon as they’re gone, their replacement pods will be sent in.
Good post!
Thanks for the link.
While I agree with much of what she says, I don't agree with her labeling most of those who opposed the immigration bill as racists.
For example, while I agree with amnesty for many who've been here for years on end...I also support building a wall on the border as an issue of national security. Not because I hate Mexicans.
Spare us the spin, Linda. I emailed Townhall to have your columns removed. You're a disgrace to conservatism.
Lessons from the Immigration Victory.
There. Fixed it.
#1 lesson that needs to be learned by this:
immigration amnesty is political poison.
#2 lesson that need to be learned by this:
there is a great need for American employers for jobs that Maricans won’t do.
I’m totally against amnesty, but I AM in favor of increaing the immigration of those that are willing to do the jobs that Americans won’t do. Our economy and way of life is totally dependent upon these people.
I want to hear your objections if you are a farmer that hasn’t had to plow their crop under because they couldn’t get “wetbacks” to harvest crops, or those that don’t want to work knee deep in chicken doo-doo. I want to hear your replies if you are an American that works in a rendering plant.
I really don’t care to hear from you if you are an American working in a UAW, AFL/CIO manufacturing plant; its all too clear where that’s going.
What I have issues with are employees being exploited, e.g. Nigeria, China, Philipines, Malaysia, et ali.
We all understand why people work in those places for $0.25/day; American Labor Law lawyers haven’t been exported to thoe locations yet.
On the other hand, there is an INTENSE demand for works on American farms (for example).
The argument goes like this: pay American workers enough money to do the job, they’ll do it. I know full well that Wisconcin dairy farmers are paying their imported Mexican workers $32k/annually. The reason that they’re paying imported employees is because otherwise they’d be labor-short.
Its also interesting to hear what the American employer has to say about the work ethic of their foriegn labor pool.
That there are disgusting jobs that no American will do at ANY price is beyond ANY dispute.
What I AM opposed to though is the putrefactant process of EXCLUDING American citizen candidates for American jobs. There is some heinous crap going on with that.
That’s absolutely correct: call those phone numbers and let YOUR voice be heard.
This is what I believe: There are many people who would support some sort of amnesty (not necessarily for criminals and gang members), if our government would do a better job controlling the borders, enforcing expired visas, and busting employers of illegal aliens. I don’t think that will happen while Bush is POTUS.
It should be obvious as only white devils ever committed all the evil in this world. /s
Two of the better examples for an amendement for term limits in Congress.
Thanks for the ping.>p>Excellent suggestion - Martinez and Nelson are my congress critters - I would enjoy a round or two with both.
However, if one state does term limits, they ALL should. I’ve had long discussions about this. The determining factor on who heads up committees is length of time in office. Committee heads have a lot of power. They can bury good bills, never bring them up for discussion. Also, length of time in office brings you to membership of more important committees. Therefore, if many states do not have term limits, and only some do, only these states which do will be penalized.
There’s no way to make this a blanket decision to all states as to limiting terms, unless, I think, an amendment’s passed. And that’s just not going to happen, of course.
Very good suggestion. And, of course, you'd have to be well prepared! Hope you can do it at some point (soon).
What about McCain’s prediction that the illegals would riot if amnesty didn’t pass? It has been pretty quiet so far. Has the defeat of the amnesty bill demoralized the amnesty crowd, or is this the quiet before the storm?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.