Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions about Romney's ties to Marriott porn sales
Christian Broadcasting Network ^ | July 2, 2007 | David Brody

Posted on 07/02/2007 4:17:47 PM PDT by AFA-Michigan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 461-480 next last
To: restornu

resty,
We are talking about porn being distributed through
an on demand movie service that Marriott places in
every one of its hotel rooms to make money when a
guest watches a porn movie. (the lodge net service
also offers other non-porn movies). We are not talking
about Time Warner or Comcast.

best,
ampu


401 posted on 07/04/2007 8:26:32 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: restornu

“Marriott is a brand name put in locally owned hotels. It is a franchise operation.”

Which means that Marriott can put anything it chooses in its franchise contract. If ethics were more important than making porn profits, Marriott would contractually require franchisees — in order to use the name “Marriott” — not to associate the founder’s good name with porn and obscenity.

Restornu, you’re not just arguing that Mitt has no responsibility for Marriott selling porn in the decade he was on the board, you’re actually defending Marriott’s sale of porn itself.

And once again, you make clear that you simply don’t understand the system. You write: “A few of you, your solution would be to deprive all of the guests of this because the package also contains adult stuff.”

Wrong again. We’d simply like to see Marriott adopt the same corporate policy Omni Hotels have, for example. Provide the in-room movie system WITHOUT the porn. Is that so hard to understand, Restor? Apparently so.


402 posted on 07/04/2007 8:40:11 PM PDT by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan

I am not restor, I am Rest or Resty or restornu ~ Thank you

My friend would like to make it known that...

The Marriott has been public since 1953. The Marriott family owns about 15% of the company. The other 85% is owned by a whole bunch of investors including major institutions.

It is also worthy to note that the President of Marriott a graduate of Notre Dame who is Catholic

What is the difference between President and CEO?

“The CEO is primarily responsible for strategy: long-range planning, company direction. S/he is the most direct interface between the board of directors/stockholders and the company’s managers and employees.

The president’s role tends to be operational and tactical: S/he keeps the wheels on the car, so to speak, and attends to the day-to-day business of the company. S/he is the manager of all managers.

Now, having said that, the biggest actual difference in most companies will be determined by the legal ownership and structure of the company.“


403 posted on 07/04/2007 8:54:13 PM PDT by restornu (It takes a dyslexic one eye crusty eyelid to do the home work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Resty, the Marriotts can contractually require anything they want of franchisees in return for use of the name “Marriott” on the building.

They can require that onsite restaurants and pools meet all legally-proscribed health and safety standards.

They can require that rooms be kept clean and sanitary.

They can require that franchisees not operate prostitution services from the front desk, even in Nevada where it might be legal to do so.

And if they chose, they could require that in-room movie services in hotels that have the name “Marriott” on the outside not be selling hardcore X-rated pornography and obscenity on the outside.

Instead, Marriott negotiated a system-wide bulk rate contract with “On Command” — which is not the same thing as “on demand” — to knowingly sell and profit from porn.

Prominent LDS Church member John Harmer of Salt Lake City, former California Lt. Gov. and now chairman of a SLC-based anti-porn group The Lighted Candle Society, says it’s wrong for Marriott and other hotels to sell porn.

Since you disagree with prominent church member John Harmer, does that make you “anti-Mormon”? Just checking...


404 posted on 07/04/2007 9:01:43 PM PDT by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan

Correction:

And if they chose, they could require that in-room movie services in hotels that have the name “Marriott” on the outside not be selling hardcore X-rated pornography and obscenity on the INSIDE.


405 posted on 07/04/2007 9:04:53 PM PDT by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

It is based on the same principal!

It like King World Productions who is a Supplier and co-producer of first-run syndicated television programming.

They sell package deals which might include in that package things the buyer might not want but it a take it or leave it deal!

http://www.kingworld.com/program/index.html

If you haven’t noticed in the pass 20 years or so its been a while since good could travel on its own with the companion of the opposition!

The choice comes where one chooses not to put that channel on or choose not to purchase something bad.

You have it in the TV shows packages you receive the lemons along with the winners!

Just choose not to watch the lemons and not to buy bad stuff!


406 posted on 07/04/2007 9:40:07 PM PDT by restornu (It takes a dyslexic one eye crusty eyelid to do the home work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan
Smithee, I understand that you’re embarrassed by being repeatedly exposed the last day or two as making kneejerk assumptions yada yada yada blah blah blah...

(snip)

...hiss...crackle...your false and baseless charges makes you feel like my “friend.”

Just as I predicted. You DID continue to thump your chest talking about how much smarter than me you are. And you DIDN'T say which candidate you support for President.

Good night. : )

407 posted on 07/04/2007 9:46:23 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Has George W. Bush been taking Carter's Little Pills?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan

None of us who are LDS have to check our free will at the door that is a template you conjured up!

I don’t feel J. Marriott, nor is Mitt responsible no matter how much you would enjoy holding them to your assumptions.


408 posted on 07/04/2007 9:56:44 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: restornu

I suggest you take the Marriott test.

Check into your local Marriott, go
to adult selections. Choose one -
any one. Witness that Marriott charges
you extra so that they can pay their
board members. Witness the porn. Then
ask why Romney didn’t have a problem
with this profit center. It’s that
easy.


409 posted on 07/05/2007 8:21:29 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
This is absurd.

If Mitt Romney is going to put on the mantle of wholesome family guy, it seems fair to me to ask him if he was involved with any porn-related decision while on the board. If his actions suggest that he battled against the policy, his family-friendly credentials are strengthened. If he didn't try to stop the policy, Romney is open to a charge of hypocrisy which is better discovered now than in the general election (if he were to get the nomination).

410 posted on 07/05/2007 8:54:59 AM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

It don’t matter one has to make a conscientious choice to purchase among all the free TV just like at home not it might be more raunchy but raunchy is raunchy and has nothing to do with highend hotels it has to do with the fool who exercise free will!

You are so consumed with blind contempt for the LDS and Romney!

Have a nice day!:)


411 posted on 07/05/2007 9:25:34 AM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: restornu

resty,
You do not understand what is involved. This
is why I suggested you take the Marriott test.
Did you complete the Marriott test so quickly???

Once you take the test, you will realize it is
not the same. If you are unwilling to actually
see firsthand the difference between this and
what is offered through pay for view on home
systems, you do not understand.

Beyond this, the point isn’t whether they
are the same or different. The issue
is that -—>>MARRIOTT PROFITS OFF INDIVIDUAL GUESTS
WATCHING PORN. MITT KNEW THIS.<<-— That is
the point for those of us who are anti-porn.

As you know, I’m not voting for mitt for at
least two reasons already, so it matters not
to me. But I am AMAZED that you are unwilling
to see the issue involved resty.

AMAZED.


412 posted on 07/05/2007 10:17:22 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

“You DID continue to thump your chest talking about how much smarter than me you are.”

Smithee, for all I know, you’re a neuro-surgeon and 10 times as smart as me.

But you’ve given no indication of such here, only a kneejerk propensity for false assumptions, false accusations, and premature celebrations.

Given the evidence, no chest-thumping required...


413 posted on 07/05/2007 10:48:39 AM PDT by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Resty writes: “I don’t feel J. Marriott, nor is Mitt responsible no matter how much you would enjoy holding them to your assumptions.”

I see. The people who sell porn are not responsible for the selling of porn. (Pray tell, Resty, who is?)

Refusing to be drawn into a discussion based on facts and reasoning, Resty then retreats once again to the favorite refuge of Romney defenders:

“You are so consumed with blind contempt for the LDS and Romney!”

(Funny, how come when somebody criticizes Rudy’s record, they’re not accused of being anti-Catholic? And why aren’t McCain’s critics routinely accused of being anti-Episcopalian?)

But why do you keep dodging the question, Resty?

Prominent LDS Church member John Harmer, chairman of the Salt Lake City-based anti-porn group The Lighted Candle Society, says Marriott and other hotel chains are wrong to sell porn. And he does hold board members like Romney responsible.

Since prominent LDS Church member John Harmer disagrees with Marriott and Mitt (and you) on the selling of porn, does that mean prominent LDS Church member John Harmer is also “consumed with blind contempt for the LDS”?

Or since you disagree with prominent LDS Church member John Harmer on this issue, does that mean that you, Resty, are “consumed with blind contempt for the LDS”?

Hint: the easy way out, rather than just keep dodging it, is to finally lay down the “poor victim of religious persecution” weapon you’re so used to wielding and just admit that non-Mormons can agree or disagree with Mormons, and Mormons can even disagree with each other, and none of it has anything to do with their religion.

Marriott’s porn sales, and Romney’s share of responsibility for such sales, have nothing to do with their religion (except to the extent that porn sales is at odds with the tenets of their own faith).

Whoever owns Hilton Hotels is guilty too, and I haven’t a clue what religion if any they are...except I read Paris says she found God in jail recently, if that’s any indication.


414 posted on 07/05/2007 11:03:37 AM PDT by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Already read this stuff ... something duplicitous about it all.


415 posted on 07/05/2007 11:14:53 AM PDT by papagall (Attaboys are cheap; one dagnabit cancels out dozens of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
I too would like to hear his answer on this one. We are clearly in a moral discussion and not a political or legal one, but it is nevertheless very important. I have long held contempt for Marriot and their unwillingness to address this issue. Ampu, you must know that in every priesthood address by the Prophet, we are given clear warning and heart-felt pleading to avoid pornography as though it were a foul disease. It is destroying lives. The Church, in fact, just put out another publication, going to every member's home via their home teachers, dealing with this subject again. I don't want to be overly dramatic here. Suffice it to say if Romney hasn't had the courage to fight what he knows is expressly against his beliefs while he has had power and opportunity to do so- if even just to raise a warning voice, I can have no confidence that he will champion anything else that really matters when he is in that esteemed position of power. I believe this is a topic worthy of the national stage. Personally I believe it is damning to all of those who have encouraged it or turned a blind eye to its promulgation.
416 posted on 07/05/2007 11:28:58 AM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: DanielLongo

DanielLongo,

I am glad we have found common ground. That
is the issue. No more or no less. I would
feel the same about any candidate, but in
this instance, the guy is a fairly well
entrenched member of his religion that
opposes porn - as are the Marriott family
members (my understanding).

... and in a POTUS primary, this stuff is
all grist for the mill. Some voters would
like to know this and they have the right
to ask. Mitt has the right to answer or
avoid answering. His call, since he will
have to weigh the consequences.

I simply like to see how consistent a person
is with their professed beliefs. In mitt’s
case, it is just idle interest, since I am
not voting for mitt in any race.

And Daniel, you are right, it destroys families.

Though this be a brief moment of agreement,
I’m with you on it.

ampu


417 posted on 07/05/2007 12:00:45 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan; aMorePerfectUnion; Austin1; bcbuster; beaversmom; bethtopaz; BlueAngel; ...
I just spoke to the Marriott Hotel head quarters and they informed me that it was package deal, just as I said that those who subscribe to Digital Cable Value this is included in the package, and you have the option to block it!

Should the two of you continue this mischaracterization, I will consider the two you doing this with the intent to distort the true situation!


418 posted on 07/05/2007 12:45:00 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: DanielLongo; All

Than I suggest if you have Digital Cable you better remove it for you have access to Porn in your home brother!


419 posted on 07/05/2007 12:51:03 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: restornu

resty,
Who do you think purchases the package from
Lodgenet? Who do you think gets a cut of the money
when porn is purchased? Lodgenet is installed
to be a money maker for the hotel (Marriott isn’t
the only one) and it’s a HUGE one.

1. I am not mischaracterizing what they do -
I’ve witnessed it many times in a Marriott
when I stay there.

2. It doesn’t matter to me whether you consider
it anything. You are uninformed, having never
stayed there. You did not take the test.

best,
ampu


420 posted on 07/05/2007 12:54:12 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 461-480 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson