Posted on 06/30/2007 4:36:50 PM PDT by 1066AD
Okay, free thinker, who killed Kennedy? Provide evidence.
If Oswald even had a real part in the slaying at all, he certainly did not act alone. I believe that he was indeed a Patsy.
I have no control over what you believe, and no way to align it with facts. Not my problem.
My recollection is that they used the vintage limo from a JFK tour outfit in Dallas. I don't know if they still operate the tour.
That is crap. There isn't a bolt action made, including single shots, that I can't fire three rounds accruately from in 9 seconds.
I once shot a large buck in a trot, he jumped in the air, and I shot him again as he was coming down with a Remington 700. Both shots hit within 1/2 inch of each other.
When asked by the Warren Commission, "Now, were there any people standing on the high side high ground between your tower and where Elm Street goes down under the underpass toward the mouth of the underpass?" Bowers testified that at the time the motorcade went by on Elm Street, two men were in the area, standing 10 to 15 feet (3 to 5 m) apart near the Triple Underpass, and did not appear to know each other. One was "middle-aged, or slightly older, fairly heavy-set, in a white shirt, fairly dark trousers" and the other was "younger man, about midtwenties, in either a plaid shirt or plaid coat or jacket." One or both were still there when the first police officer arrived "immediately" after the shooting. Many assumed that Bowers meant that these men were standing behind the stockade fence at the top of the grassy knoll.
However, two years later when Bowers was interviewed by assassination researchers Mark Lane and Emile de Antonio for their documentary film Rush to Judgment, he clarified that these two men were on the opposite side of the fence, and that no one was behind the fence when the shots were fired.[1] Photographs of the grassy knoll during the assassination show heavy-set, middle-aged Dealey Plaza groundskeeper Emmett Hudson and a younger man, whom Hudson estimated was in his late twenties,[2] standing on the stairway leading from Elm Street up to the stockade fence (a third man stands a few steps below them).[3] Bowers was not sure if he could see the older man after the shootings, and a photograph show Hudson sitting down on the steps at that time.[4]
The switching tower as of last month looking from the corner of the picket fence.
Is that you Wild Bill Hickok?
I grew up shooting and learned to reload a bolt action without ever losing my sight picture. Most people dismount the weapon.
The first time I shot skeet with a pump shotgun I got a lot of stares too.
Truly, anyone that can't place a well aimed shot every two seconds with a bolt-action rifle isn't worth their salt.
The British Army's standard for the Enfield was an average of 10 aimed rounds per minute, and that's taking into account reloading.
Oswald’s range scores were 48/50 and 49/50 in rapid fire drills as a Marine. He obviously could have accomplished the deed.
Your feats are downright spooky! Count me as a friend.
By the way. I got to walk the sight in Dallas when I was 16. I remember thinking that the shooting involved was fairly simplistic stuff.
Above and behind w/ a target moving in a straight line slowly away from you. As a shooter, is there an easier shot?
“It’s the returning to aimpoint 3 times and hitting a moving target that would be the challenge.”
Yea - all these gun experts here have no experience with cheap vintage bolt actions that had incredible creep and pull in their triggers.
A marksman trained to squeeze these triggers for 4 or 5 minutes of accuracy would take 10 to 15 seconds for one shot.
Most interesting.
Not really. People want it to be impossible, but it was really simplistic shooting.
I don’t think you’ve read the posts of the gun experts on this thread. Do you need the post #’s?
Well I think the equivalent today might be $150 or something. Not a top-shelf item, but entirely capable of what it is designed to do. NOw I don’t want to be misunderstood in that I don’t necessarily think there was any kind of organized thing with this Oswald guy, but the appearance of same could have led to all sorts of repurcussions. The effect could have been the same. On the other hand it’s not productive to blame everyone else on the planet either.
Their contemporaries, Brit, Nip, German and Russian from that era run between $85 to $199 or so. Of course if you can find a Garand (US M-1) for less than $600 grab it quick.
The NRA HighPower Matches are like that. 10 rounds at 200 yards from the sitting or kneeling position in one minute. 10 rounds at 300 yards from the prone with 70 seconds. During the 1960’s, the only gun worth using was an accurized 03A3 bolt action Springfield. Too many people today forget we didn’t start with semi-autmatics.
Some people still use bolt guns because of the accuracy.
Wow! exciting, I hope that they didn't use live ammo ;o)
This doesn't make sense to me. A closer shot would have a higher velocity (more energy), hence more likely to be damaged when it stuck tissue. Am I mission something?
Because I am so unimpressed by the Warren Commission investigation, and sloppy coverup...That Simple...
The worse evidence of what happened in Dealy Plaza is the govt’s. There’s NO Chain of evidence, or logical explanation they provide.
You have to have ‘blind faith’ in the govt’s evidence to accept it.....
“Why are some people so easily impressed by arguments, and even evidence, that something could not have happened?”
Thanks for the clarification. BTW, “Only dropped once,” LOL!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.