Posted on 06/26/2007 4:39:34 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
It’s MSNBC for chrissakes. What did she expect?
And this makes her filthy?
Oh, wow! somebody needs to forward this!
That's another odd thing about liberals; they can't get a clue.
In their minds, at least, they are doing such wonderful things bashing the Republicans, that the "ratings thing" doesn't matter.
And let's not forget; even the advertisers are liberals, too.
Kinda like shooting fish in a barrel, IMO.
And a mighty fine-looking group as well!
On the other hand, it would be entertaining to see Edwards channeling a pair of pants...
They remind me of the Adams family!
Thought he was a troll.
I'm betting he was crouching behind the door, mouthing the words he coached his wife to say.
I glanced at your tagline....is that new for today? I like it. Guess you saw mine....just looking for one! LOL
Yes, it's new today. I just thought it up to go along with the post I was responding to.
So let's see... licensing, royalties, future "unspecified gifts", yea, sure you can use it.
Glad to help.
Wait. Are you saying you’ve never heard of the phrase “filthy rich?” It doesn’t have anything to do with being actually dirty.
Nope...of course I've seen the term.
It appeared to me you were denigrating her supposed monetary success.....
Maybe I am wrong.....Won't be the last time.
Sorry if I'm barking up the wrong tree....
Why I called Ann Coulter [Elizabeth Edwards wants your money]
Posted by RedRover
On News/Activism 06/27/2007 9:14:10 AM PDT · 85 replies · 2,509+ views
E-mail / John Edwards 08 | June 27, 2007 | Elizabeth Edwards
Edwards Exploited Son's Death, Not Coulter
Posted by Def Conservative
On News/Activism 06/27/2007 8:13:46 AM PDT · 67 replies · 2,173+ views
Elizabeth Edwards Confronts Ann Coulter(FReep this poll)
Posted by BBell
On News/Activism 06/27/2007 7:39:32 AM PDT · 61 replies · 2,164+ views
AP,AOL ^ | 2007-06-27 | MIKE BAKER
“Say what you will about AC, she’s clever and has got her audience pegged. It is a shame there are so many people who mistake hyperbole and insults for arguments.”
Frankly I’m astounded that Ann has found so many willing ears to offend. The difference between Ann and the vitriolic swarmy crowd like Maher and Franken is that she couches her arguments in biting humor that makes her points more cogent, not less.
The others of the leftist persuasion are incapable of such brilliance.
Ann is a damn good solider and she backs down to no one, even the liberals and leftists like Elizabeth Edwards who live cushy lives off of the system’s weaknesses that her husband exploits so well.
And Ann was kind enough to point that out as well. I’m sure Edwards was sitting nearby and cringing. You think he wants his phoniness exposed by Ann Coulter? That’s a sure fire way to end in disaster.
Not even a trail lawyer can dissemble that quickly. She’d tear him to pieces and there’d be nothing left of his once proclaimed intellect.
What can I say! Did I ask or just HINT? I’m not very coy, huh? Shall I call a news conference to announce it.....just kidding!! LOL! With your name, you could do these on a regular basis.........
Filthy rich........thats what I’ve always wanted to be!!
I’m astounded you're astounded. She intends to offend so it is therefore no surprise she offends.
And I continue to be astounded by how astounded you are.
Ann doesn’t intend to offend. She intends to crush the political will of the opposition to stand up to her political wit.
And they can’t. So they complain how offended they are. Endlessly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.