Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Commerce Secretary]Gutierrez: No immigration bill ‘terrible for national security’
The Hill ^ | June 22, 2007 | Ian Swanson

Posted on 06/21/2007 8:59:53 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
I am starting to think that these elitists see us as retarded children who must be led to "what's good for them" and have it explained to us in very simple terms. What happened to the country I was born in?
1 posted on 06/21/2007 8:59:56 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Surely his boss explained to him that we “don’t want what’s right for America.”


2 posted on 06/21/2007 9:02:26 PM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It will be taken up by the next President if he is a conservative....If not even Kennedy on crack couldnt dream up anything worse than this, it was his best shot for liberals


3 posted on 06/21/2007 9:06:58 PM PDT by rolling_stone (same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VR-21

No, we’re nativist, xenophobic, racist bigots; haven’t you heard? Sittin’ in our double-wides, polishin’ our shotguns, drinkin’ corn likker and shackin’ up with our sisters...


4 posted on 06/21/2007 9:08:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Commerce Secretary Gutierrrz.....go straight to hell, do not pass go, do not collect $200. Go straight to hell!


5 posted on 06/21/2007 9:11:30 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I was with ya till’ ya got to that sister part. Mine brake mirrers.


6 posted on 06/21/2007 9:11:54 PM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
That would be terrible for national security

More national death threat blackmail from the administration. "If you don't give us amnesty, we will refuse to enforce the immigration laws and jeopardize national security."

After amnesty, they will be falling over each other to show how opposed they are to anything that would rub the new voters the wrong way. If you think you've seen a refusal to protect the borders and confront the illegals now, just wait and see how worse it will get after amnesty.

7 posted on 06/21/2007 9:11:58 PM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
>>polishin’ our shotguns<<

Absolutely. Especially to shoot at "clay pigeons."


8 posted on 06/21/2007 9:13:11 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Illegals: representation without taxation--Citizens: taxation without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Has any administration official mentioned why they chose not to enforce the laws?


9 posted on 06/21/2007 9:13:23 PM PDT by common denominator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VR-21

Ain’t ya got no feed sacks out in yer neck o’ the woods? Well, there ya are!!


10 posted on 06/21/2007 9:13:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s so important they waited SIX YEARS to address it.

These people think we are stupid. Or, they are stupid. Or they are liars. None of the options are good.


11 posted on 06/21/2007 9:14:02 PM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We could be arguing about the meaning of amnesty for the next 10 years

There is nothing to argue about. They come here illegally, we allow them to stay, they become legal. Then they become citizens (after having the citizenship test given to them in spanish). Sure sounds like amnesty to me.

And frankly Mr. Gutierrez, I don't give a rat's ass how you "define" it, or what you call it. I don't want illegals to be allowed to stay in this country. How simple is that? Since I am obviously a simple person, as evidenced by the fact that I don't believe a word that comes out of your mouth, it is only logical that I talk to you in simple terms.

You can call it "immigration reform" but I call it a big load of crapolla.

12 posted on 06/21/2007 9:18:52 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Weez pore, an only hav enuff feed saks for the livestock.


13 posted on 06/21/2007 9:19:26 PM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VR-21

Well, then do as we do, kill two birds with one stone...


14 posted on 06/21/2007 9:22:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sheana
[Commerce Secretary]Gutierrez: No immigration bill ‘terrible for national security’

Mr Commerce Secretary Gutierrez: "Be advised this immigration bill is ‘terrible for national security’, The Grand Compromise II. As was the 'The Grand Compromise I' and the 2006 McCain-Kennedy Immigration Fiasco were ‘terrible for national security’."

Maybe you should stick to commerce and not immigration. Or are you telling your trafficking is 12-20 million bodies is relative to commerce.
15 posted on 06/21/2007 9:22:48 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: common denominator
According to Robert Novak

6. President Bush did himself no favors last week by denouncing those opposed to the immigration bill as uninterested in the nation's well-being. On its own, the decision to combine border security with naturalization of illegal immigrants has always been the President's way of holding a national priority (security) hostage to a policy (legalization) that he views as desirable.

16 posted on 06/21/2007 9:23:49 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sheana

Just say NO to Illegal Alien Amnesty!! Keep calling!! It’s NOT OVER!!

U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121

U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121

White House comments: (202) 456-1111

Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep

Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm


17 posted on 06/21/2007 9:24:41 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Mr. Gutierrez, this is what “terrible for national security.” It is that our government has let 12 to 20 million people into this country without knowing who they are. We don’t need any sermons on the subject.


18 posted on 06/21/2007 9:25:20 PM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No way, then we wouldn’t be able to kiss em’.


19 posted on 06/21/2007 9:27:15 PM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Okay. Now, it's that we can't/won't prosper without illegal immigrants because we need the workers.

NO TO AMNESTY.

Deport the illegals!!

20 posted on 06/21/2007 9:27:40 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border then, Introduce an Illegal Immigrant Deportation Bill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson