Posted on 06/20/2007 6:30:02 PM PDT by Salo
LOL you brought up Apple not me, but forgot you always defend the Russian hackers who have to crack it for access,which is perfect proof it’s not given away for free like Linux. And yes Microsoft has said repeatedly they want to cross license patents, not infringe, unlike your leftist heroes and yourself who oppose US intellectual property laws and steal what isn’t handed to you by papa Stallman. Must be a tough life for you, begging for handouts, stealing what isn’t given to you for free, then have to go in every morning and run the software of the richest American capitalist you despise. Meanwhile, I’ve never been better LOL, just got a huge bonus check, and can’t think of a single thing I don’t already have. Yep we’re exactly opposite all right, good thing too.
LOL you brought up Apple not me
Lie. Between us, you brought it up first in #55. I didn't mention OS X until #66. Why do you lie when it's so easily verifiable? Is it a pathological need to lie?
And yes Microsoft has said repeatedly they want to cross license patents, not infringe
Proof, and explain it in the face of multiple patent infringement suits where they chose not to license. Are you lying, or is Microsoft?
unlike your leftist heroes and yourself who oppose US intellectual property laws and steal what isnt handed to
You mean like illegally distributing millions of copies of a copyrighted work? I know you support that.
cant think of a single thing I dont already have
Honesty.
Because 55 isn’t even addressed to you, you jumped in that discussion and tried to claim Apple is equivalent to Linux on free givaways to communists, which we know for a fact isn’t true since you’re constantly defending Russian hackers who illegal crack it.
Bottom line you defend communists over all else, whether they’re being given free handouts like Linux, violating US patents when they distribute it, or crack closed operating systems like Apple’s OSX.
I must counter your lies whenever I see them. You said Apple didn't give away technology, and that is factually incorrect. I even gave specific examples, and you tried to redefine the game to what the Chinese actually use. I then gave you an example that fit your new definition. In short, you still can't admit to lying.
You once actually fooled someone into believing your lies, never again.
Bottom line you defend communists over all else
Actually, I don't. You only say I do (and who believes you with all of your proven lies on this thread alone?). But we do have it on record that you defend criminals who illegally make millions off of the work of others without permission.
handouts like Linux, violating US patents when they distribute it
Really? I don't remember any patent that could possibly be infringed by Linux being upheld in court. Until then, all we have are allegations, including from Microsoft, which is afraid to even disclose their supposed patents.
Apple doesn’t give their O/S away to communists for free, we know this for a fact since you constantly defend the Russian pirates who illegaly crack Apple’s operating system. Certainly you remember your endless defenses of the Russian hackers, starting with “the 180 day rule for criminal prosecution”, and ending with you making up lies about Russian hackers working for the US DoD. LOL that is the all time classic communist defense. But here you are again, with your tired old excuses for communists and free software for the world. Sure they get the dregs for free, but to get the good stuff you and your communist hacker buddies will have to keep on stealing it.
I never said they did. You, however, said they didn't give away technology, which they clearly do, and it's being used by the communists this very day.
Certainly you remember your endless defenses of the Russian hackers, starting with the 180 day rule for criminal prosecution
Of course. You were calling them criminal, and I pointed out to you the appropriate section of the United States Code that showed their actions, according to evidence, would be at most a civil case. Don't like it? Have criticisms? Don't blame me, it's the law. You know, the one you were just on me about for criticizing.
This is of course contrary to those who you defend, distributing copyrighted works for profit, and at their level of profit it is a criminal offense.
you making up lies about Russian hackers working for the US DoD
You are still bitter about that, aren't you? A woman scorned...
You can argue semantics all you want. Your sole purpose here is to defend communists, whether they be radical green party leftists like Richard Stallman or Russian hackers cracking US proprietary operating systems. You clearly have no other defense, or even straight denials at this point. Doublespeak is all you have, some of us see right through it in a single post.
I'm done with this. I've slapped you around enough here, and even got you to admit you support those who commit blatantly criminal acts. Just go defend criminals and lie about Apple and Microsoft somewhere else. Troll filter, ON.
LOL yeah you got me to “admit” I don’t ever defend leftists, while that’s all you ever do. Classic!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.