Posted on 06/19/2007 1:25:13 PM PDT by SJackson
In my view when it comes to foreign affairs Ron Paul has his head so far up his butt he can't se a thing through his brown covered corneas.
My thread hijacking Paulite internut, I guess the way it works is that you now claim Ron is RONALD REAGAN incarnate.
Then I point out the contempt Paul had for Reagan's foreign policy.
From Grenada where we went in at the behest of several foreign governments (he wrote about that in High Times when he was pandering to the dopers), to Central America, to Afghanistan, the source of 9/11.
Then there's Lebanon, the issue the liar wraps himself in.
Ron Paul would have gone into Lebanon as Reagan did, a mistake.
BS he's lying.
Would he have left, sure.
OOOH RAAAH/
Ron Paul=Ronald Reagan!
But oops, in leaving would he have interfered to save Arafat and the PLO? Not very Paulite.
Would he have interfered to carve out a ten mile zone in south Lebanon for Israel? Not very Paulite.
Would he have boosted foreign aid to Israel by 40%? Sure, that Ron Paul.
How about the Pershing missles in Europe. Confronting evil. Did Ron Paul confront that.
Save you Ron Paul mastubatory BS for other threads.
It is, we won't ask because without serious pressure they won't do a thing. This is their game, and we're playing by their rules.
Truth hurts, doesn’t it. Hence your incoherent reply.
No, hence your inability to address the issues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.