Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
To: Sub-Driver
Gates:
"It would be a backward-looking and very contentious process." (to extend GEN Pace)
This is revealing; "backward-looking" means they have written of Iraq and want to "move-ahead." Move-ahead to what?
112 posted on
06/15/2007 2:47:39 PM PDT by
Ace's Dad
("I think I'd better do the actual stealing.")
To: Sub-Driver
Bush is the one who should be getting his “walking papers”!!!
118 posted on
06/15/2007 3:20:43 PM PDT by
varon
(Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
To: P-Marlowe; Thunder 6; Blueflag; rdb3; LTCJ
this is such a sad commentary on this administration and especially about Gates.
122 posted on
06/15/2007 4:11:26 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: Sub-Driver
Under normal circumstances I’d think this sounds self-serving, but given the pathetic state of our political machine, I’m glad he said it. Right on, sir.
128 posted on
06/15/2007 5:41:49 PM PDT by
FlyVet
To: Sub-Driver
Pace really wanted to kick some ass is Iraq and I think his ideas were not mainstream in the DOD bureaucracy. Especially the way Bush has handicapped our fighting men with the current rules of engagement.
To: meandog
I see, people should just ignore those pesky facts that don’t fit the Bush hater’s dogmas.
139 posted on
06/18/2007 5:19:06 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(If you will try being smarter, I will try being nicer.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson