Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Mighty' Hypocrite Angelina Joile Bans FOX and Others From Premiere
© 2007 FOX News Network, LLC. ^ | Thursday, June 14, 2007 | By Roger Friedman

Posted on 06/14/2007 4:45:42 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last
To: EdnaMode

...and didn’t the Skywalkers say, “ewwww”?


81 posted on 06/14/2007 7:17:20 PM PDT by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Its funny this fear of Fox news.

Yes it is. Liberals are afraid they might have to actually entertain the idea of thinking for themselves. The idea that there might be another side to the story -- not just what the MSM decides what one is allowed to believe -- disturbs their comfort zone. And I find it amusing that an immoral, homewrecking, adultress like Jolie would have the gall to pass judgment on anybody or anything. Typical Hollyweirdo.

82 posted on 06/14/2007 7:36:21 PM PDT by Proudcongal (One cannot have an understanding of or respect for the U.S. Constitution and be a leftist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Brad’s mom and sister are in NYC with them for the premier.


83 posted on 06/15/2007 6:44:41 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: PrepareToLeave

Just read on people.com that her admittedly “overzealous” lawyer drafted that document and Angelina knew nothing about it except that he was trying to protect her. Appears he issued a statement this morning (or late yesterday). Did you see her on Larry King?


84 posted on 06/15/2007 6:46:40 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

I caught part of it on MSNBC this a.m. Thanks for the update. You sound like a fan too. People love to take shots at her for petty reasons. I admire her work in films and of course her compassion for children. She puts herself out there and takes what comes with a lot of grace.


85 posted on 06/15/2007 6:54:05 AM PDT by PrepareToLeave (Fight on Christian soldiers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PrepareToLeave

The only problem I have with this whole fiasco is that it will no doubt hurt box office sales. On the other hand, that is the least of Jolie’s concerns as she knows that people who want to see the story told in film will see it. And I am on that list.


86 posted on 06/15/2007 6:58:51 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

Sorry Sarasota, she didn’t start the adoption trend. Hollywood actresses have been adopting for their persona for years.


87 posted on 06/15/2007 6:33:17 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (http://www.imwithfred.com/index.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

OK. But kids from Nam, Ethopia, etc.?


88 posted on 06/16/2007 5:35:46 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: bannie

you know what a good tatoo would be?

‘DEATH BEFORE DISHONOR’

that’d be good for a tatoo.....


89 posted on 06/16/2007 5:46:24 PM PDT by flat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

Well not so much adopting babies from poor countries, but you must realise that not too many years ago abortion wasnt the easist thing to get,and there were plenty of white babies, also Political correctness wasnt the big thing it is now.
Back then an actress could adopt a white baby from a poor girl and get the same zip for the dollar as Jolie gets now with her technicolor adoptions.


90 posted on 06/16/2007 6:29:23 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (http://www.imwithfred.com/index.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: flat

you know what a good tatoo would be?

‘DEATH BEFORE DISHONOR’

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I think Mike Nifong has one like that.


91 posted on 06/16/2007 6:30:25 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (http://www.imwithfred.com/index.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

New CFR member Jolie...
http://www.people.com/people/article/0%2C%2C20041839%2C00.html?xid=rss-topheadlines


92 posted on 06/16/2007 6:36:03 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flat
I don’t think there’s any room left on the girl for another tattoo.

Also, I don’t think “dishonor” is something this woman worries about. At least, her boyfriend’s x-husband wouldn’t think “honor” is one of angelina’s worries.

93 posted on 06/16/2007 7:43:05 PM PDT by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

She and Brad are going for a total of from 7-14 kids. Imagine.


94 posted on 06/17/2007 11:19:00 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Meanwhile, in the real world:
spaceflightnow.com
1753 GMT (1:53 p.m. EDT)

Pat Forrester is working on the Drive Lock Assembly that controls the Solar Alpha Rotary Joint while Steve Swanson has removed the first three of six launch restraints on the SARJ. The joint is a large wheel that allows the solar arrays to track the sun.

1718 GMT (1:18 p.m. EDT)

The camera stansion has been attached to the S3 truss. Attention will be turning to work on the solar array rotary joint.

1700 GMT (1:00 p.m. EDT)

The spacewalkers have made their way out to the Starboard 3 truss of the space station. The first task of the EVA is installing a holding unit for a television camera.

1626 GMT (12:26 p.m. EDT)

EVA BEGINS. Pat Forrester and Steve Swanson switched their spacesuits to internal battery power at 12:25 p.m. EDT, marking the official start time for today’s spacewalk. This fourth and final EVA of Atlantis’ mission will complete the assembly tasks associated with activation of the new solar array truss delivered by the shuttle.


It’s not Hollywood.


95 posted on 06/17/2007 11:21:52 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson