FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
And they eat their own too....
Posted on 06/10/2007 4:51:37 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
He will tell the seminar that promoting the use of biofuels is likely to increase greenhouse gas emissions.Deniar!
the whacko veggies are probably laughing
that they made the price of beef go up.
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
I thought he was going to talk about the CO2 given off in te fermentation process - shouldn’t that be counted as part of the CO2 (now it’s cliche time!) “footprint” of ethanol and such?
“I thought he was going to talk about the CO2 given off in te fermentation process - shouldn’t that be counted as part of the CO2 (now it’s cliche time!) “footprint” of ethanol and such?”
And I thought that Jack Daniels, Smirnoff, et al should be taking the lead in ethanol fuels. You’d think they know how to do this kinda thing....
“Roland Clift will tell a seminar of the Royal Academy of Engineering that the plan to promote bioethanol and biodiesel produced from plants is a “scam”.”
Corn growers are deeply saddened.
We need to go back to hunting whales as a source for fuel.
If all the corn in the United States were used for ethanol production, it would supply about 15% of the nation’s gasoline needs and we would have very little to eat.
I keep waiting for one of them to say, “Are you of the Body? You’re not of the Body!”
Well of course they’re a scam! Just like HOV, or carpool lanes which only work as long as no more than 3% of the population actually uses them ;’}
Have you been routing with the piggies?
BioDiesel made from algae grown at powerplants where the algae are “fed” the CO2 output from power generation seems to make sense to me.
read again, it sounds like he is of the “force them all into busses” crowd.
Actually, you misspelled it.
It’s “denier”.
But yes, you’re absolutely right. Anybody who questions any non-proven scientific, pseudo-scientific, quasi-scientific, or out-and-out non-scientific assertion — as long as the assertion is made by the High Priests of the Global Church of Environmental Correctness — are automatically “deniers”.
You don’t get to question pronouncements handed down by Environmentalists.
That goes without saying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.