Author Paul Williams: Al-Qaida 'Definitely Has Nukes'

NewsMax ^ | Tuesday, June 5, 2007 | Phil Brennan

[Wyatt's Torch]

"A nuclear bomb here; say good bye to Mecca and Medina."

Add Tehran and Damascus and that the right response but I truly wonder if we have the guts to do it...

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Not at this time. We’ll have to be hit first.

[Little Ray]

He’s selling books.

Anyone who thinks a 10 KT nuke would take out all of Israel has failed his WMD classes. It would make a hell of a dent in a city, and the fallout would be a b!tch, but it would not take out “all of Israel in the blink of an eye.”

As for the rest, if Al-Qaeda had even ONE nuke in the USA, they would have used it, just to prove they’re still potent.

[Wyatt's Torch]

“We’ll have to be hit first.”

Even then I wonder if we have the guts. The “just talk to them” crowd will cower in fear of the “cycle of violence”...

[ovrtaxt]

You won’t get any flames from me. Check my homepage on ‘how to win the war”.

[TalkingPoint]

Iv’e been following Paul for about three years now and to be honest I don’t know what to think. On one hand most of his claims have been repeated by people in the know for years now. How much of it is truth?; one can only guess. I think I tend to think AQ would have done it already because I don’t buy the whole “they are patient” thing. You can’t sit on those thing’s like you have all the time in the world.

[oldstyle81]

“I believe that between now and 2005, Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida will attack the U.S. with [stolen] nuclear weapons. I have no doubt about it,” says Williams.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/7/14/215350.shtml

[oldstyle81]

“Before 9/11 a guy by the name of Sheik Kabbani, the president of the Supreme Islamic Council of North America, appeared before the Senate and the House and said that over 48 nukes were here”

yep because no one would notice arab men (or anyone for that fact) ordering the needed equipment to take care of those 48 weapons.

[oldstyle81]

Plutonium gives off much more radiation than Uranium and thus makes it more likely to be detected. Plutonium also needs much thicker shielding otherwise the people working on it would be fried by the material

[oldstyle81]

you assume that terrorists can make small nuclear weapons which is exceptionally more difficult than making a car size bomb with the same yield of a large weapon.

[montag813]

I used to think this guy was a total crackpot when I heard him years ago on the Michael Savage show. But so many of his predictions, large and small, have come to pass. And his brave battle with that McMaster University in Canada was truly heroic. Here is a link to his legal defense fund, which is necessary because of the insane actions of the University to try and cover up the terrorist activities of its own Muslim students and faculty.

[pacelvi]

You should take a logic class. Bush and Chertoff being jokes has no relation on the motivation of the Jihadis plans nor their will in carrying them out.

I’m not trying to ‘scare’ anybody.. if you feel scared then maybe you should get help instead of trying to silence people with your hysteria.

[pacelvi]

I read somewhere that an attack order was given to nuke the Republican convention in NYC in 04. I dont remember what happened, either it was a dud or it was called off.

Yes, I know it sounds silly to forget the outcome, but I was half asleep when I read it.

[LIConFem]

Every time I see his face, the name “Little Enos” still pops into my head.

[Little Ray]

At they very least, if they couldn’t detonate one in a city, they would have detonated one just to PROVE they had them... and reaped the benefits of recruiting and blackmail.

[oldstyle81]

I was just watching Fox News and i hear this and was like whoa, i never heard this before. the guy named Copley said this

“they tried to set off a nuclear weaspon at the RNC but it wouldnt work” not the exact wording but he said it was because it did not work. However on another site his company has this
whats funny about this
“Ultimately, the jihadists’ plan was aborted on instructions from Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri because of theological rather than operational reasons”

Which is it, it didnt work or it was called off, differing stories look bad and really tear apart your credibilty

[oldstyle81]

Deuteronomy 18
21 You may say to yourselves, “How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the LORD ?” 22 If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the LORD does not take place or come true, that is a message the LORD has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously. Do not be afraid of him.

Here is some stuff that might interest you if you consider him a prophet
the nukes he claims the british agents saw were dirty bombs

That fatwa from that saudi cleric talks about dirty bombs, not nuclear weapons. Williams takes dirty bombs and says they are nuclear weapons (given to a extent they are but no one thinks of dirty bombs when Nuclear weapons is said)

he claims that al qaida tested nuclear weapons in afghanistan in 2000, of course this is from Hamid Mir who said they were dirty bombs

Here Mir says it was a dirty bomb
http://www.worldthreats.com/general_information/aqarsenal.htm
Here Williams says Nuclear suitcase weapons
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49950

.

tis is the plain he claims that one guy is using to get nukes into the united states. Pretty small, multiple trips? Like we wouldnt have knocked him out of the air one of the 14 (back and forth trips) across the border
http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=303

The sources for the suitcase weapons has also changed

here Williams says KGB
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29109

Here Williams says “The Chechen Mafia”
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/7/13/171536.shtml

Here Williams says, the Chechyens and the Russian Mafia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1604669/posts

Here Williams says, the chechyens, Russian Mafia, and black market Arms dealers

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46127