Skip to comments.
Congress Takes Action Against Rising Gas Prices
Constitutionally Right ^
| 5/23/07
| CharlesS
Posted on 05/23/2007 10:19:31 AM PDT by CharlesS
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
1
posted on
05/23/2007 10:19:33 AM PDT
by
CharlesS
To: CharlesS
Good post, Charles!
2
posted on
05/23/2007 10:21:46 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
To: CharlesS
The first paragraph made my heart skip a beat—I thought congress had actually done something HELPFUL for a change. Silly me.
3
posted on
05/23/2007 10:23:25 AM PDT
by
American Quilter
(A gun in the hand is better than a police dispatcher on the phone.)
To: CharlesS
LOL, as if sicking trial lawyers on them will make gas cheaper. All this might do is make a few lawyers really really rich.
To: CharlesS
for a second I thought they were going to open ANWR, drill off the california and florida coasts and allow shale oil drilling in colorado..
silly me..
5
posted on
05/23/2007 10:24:59 AM PDT
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(Every Democrat Party cause eventually becomes a business then it degenerates into a racket.)
To: CharlesS
Quote I overheard:
“As long as people keep buying SUV’s then gas is too cheap”.
6
posted on
05/23/2007 10:26:23 AM PDT
by
RedStateRocker
(Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
To: CharlesS
Only one problem, the Libs want high gas prices. Sure, they will scream bloody murder about gouging and the sort, but at the end of they day they want people who have to put 20+ gal of gas into their evil gas hogs to pay dearly.
7
posted on
05/23/2007 10:27:13 AM PDT
by
chaos_5
(Is it all lost?)
To: CharlesS
That’s funny. I thought insisting on the rule of law was a good thing....
8
posted on
05/23/2007 10:27:12 AM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(Did Dennis Kucinich always look like that or did he have to submit to a series of shots? [firehat])
To: CharlesS
They sue because OPEC doesn’t produce enough, and they sue so WE don’t produce more....
9
posted on
05/23/2007 10:28:24 AM PDT
by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: CharlesS
The best action that Congress could take against high gas prices is to open up the frozen tundra of Alaska and a multitude of off-shore sites to drilling. As well, they could reduce the number of environazi-induced barriers to building new refining capacity. In other words, get the heck out of the way and let the market work freely for a change.
10
posted on
05/23/2007 10:28:50 AM PDT
by
meyer
(RNC, DNC, two sides of the same coin.)
To: CharlesS
Preaching to the choir.
Every single time I have ever made these same points to any liberal, they parrot back all the same moronic talking points.
To: patton; hiredhand; Squantos
To: CharlesS
Approximately 40% of our Country's oil is provided by OPEC members, therefore it would not be a wise decision to make enemies of them by filing lawsuits in U.S. courts. That's true. We've already made them mad with the weak dolllar.
13
posted on
05/23/2007 10:30:09 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Always Right
This misleading article is actually great news—instead of hearing about the oil “ministers” on msm, we may hear of civil or even criminal indictments against these price-fixing crooks dba OPEC at long last.
Hating all attorneys except our own means hating everyone responsible for writing and enforcing our laws. I would avoid that mindset.
What OPEC is is an illegal price-fixing conspiracy that won’t take years to hurt in our courts. “Please don’t make them mad!” What hogwash, written undoubtedly by oil interests.
14
posted on
05/23/2007 10:32:00 AM PDT
by
at bay
("We actually did an evil....." Eric Schmidt, CEO Google)
To: CharlesS
You had me going with that first paragraph! I was checking for flying pigs!
15
posted on
05/23/2007 10:32:06 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: CharlesS
So the Dems are going to increase states’ debt to avoid dealing with their unwillingness to drill and refine gasoline.
To: CharlesS
Nobody is going to sue OPEC. This is a very silly idea.
17
posted on
05/23/2007 10:33:36 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Treaty)
To: CharlesS
When does Saudi Arabia respond by imposing Sharia on Budweiser and lopping off the heads of the CEO and board of directors for producing alcohol?
18
posted on
05/23/2007 10:34:19 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
To: CharlesS
Rather than pass legislation which would have an immediate impact on American consumers, the House of Representatives have decided to pass legislation which would take years to show any results. And make lots and lots of money for lawyers. Say doesn't most of the money for congressional campaigns come from lawyers and aren't most of our congress critters lawyers? There 's no way this could smack of self interest is there?
19
posted on
05/23/2007 10:37:54 AM PDT
by
fella
(Respect does not equal fear unless your a tyrant.)
To: CharlesS
"If the States were to follow the Federal Governments lead this could mean a reduction in gasoline prices by an average of 40 cents per gallon, with the higher taxed States saving as much as 51 cents per gallon."
That would just allow the gas moguls to stick it to us for another 40 - 51 cents per gallon.
The real answer lays with the people. We need to hit Exxon/Mobil with a grassroots boycott, not another e-chain letter pipe dream. The concept is good, but the execution of past boycotts has been worthless.
If all of the conservative Radio/TV hosts would join forces and lead the charge, "We the People" could control gas prices. It may take up to 30 days to get the boycott up to full strength, but through perseverance and endurance we would prevail. Once we get gas prices under control, we will have to keep awareness up in order to maintain said control.
20
posted on
05/23/2007 10:40:53 AM PDT
by
BigAlPro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson