Posted on 05/20/2007 2:54:16 PM PDT by Reaganesque
No matter how much EV pushes our buttons in this season of election that is not always the case during off season let us keep this in mind!
Neither you or I would like that kind of threat trying to hinder EV from Free Speech and it should not be acceptable by any freeper!
That was a long time ago, apparently. Just like privatization, it doesn't suit the current crop of aficionados.
Can we cut this out? Physical threats, even non-serious ones from hotheads, should never EVER be tolerated.
The largest Boy Scout council in the country responded to the call for volunteers issued by the Salt Lake Olympic Organizing Committee, but the welcome mat was rolled up and the door slammed in its face. Olympic spokesmen for the 2002 winter games say the exclusion has nothing to do with recent protests by gay activists. While the organizing committee for the Olympic event is prominently displaying a call for local volunteers, they have explicitly let it be known that the Boy Scouts need not apply. "For us not to be involved is discouraging, considering the Atlanta games. The Scouting council there was extremely involved," said Kay Godfrey, professional Scout executive for the Great Salt Lake Council of Boy Scouts.
Did Romney really make the statement, "I feel that all people should be allowed to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation."? Why would he use his office to impose his view on a private organization?
Is it true he restricted BSA participation in the Olympics while the Olympics was pleading for volunteers to help out?
As I said earlier, I'd not paid much attention to the Governor until a week ago. I've seen websites making these claims, and I've seen some "XXX for Mitt" sites making the claims these are untrue, but offering no documentation. I would think it would be easy to do so, showing the text of the quoted speeches, showing that BSA participated in the Olympic volunteer effort, etc.
Here's my hangup: The man is saying the right words, but his ideology SEEMS to be a complete reversal of his stands and actions from just a few years ago. We've had so many Republicans run as conservatives, but morphing into something else once they get in office. I don't want an election-year conservative in the White House.
Keep reading, Gitmo, we covered this topic.
I’m not disputing either.
But I note that you were not careful enough to give a source.
Good grief. THIS got Cold Heat banned???
You're an embarrassment, EV. A pathetic, droning, boring, embarrassment. YOU know where you live, and that's shame enough for any one person. If you had any honor at all, you'd ban yourself.
If personal physical threats are not bannable offenses, what ever would be?
I don’t know about you, but I sure wouldn’t want to be part of a forum like that.
A question for you: Do you know what was in the other deleted post?
I can’t believe you’re defending behavior like this. You really do have a full dose of Romney Derangement Syndrome.
I thought it was obvious. You said there were too many points in EternalVigilance post to address (and you complained to the moderator about that post). So I asked if you could address 2 of his points. EV's post was the source. I was asking because I am curious if EV is right or not. As I said in an earlier post to you, I don't know enough about Romney to determine if EV is right. That's why I asked if you could dispute him.
Wow. That was, what, a 4-year-old post or something.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.