Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Send in the assmonkeys (latest environmentalist fad: going childless)
National Post - Canada ^ | Tuesday, May 15, 2007 | Jonathan Kay

Posted on 05/15/2007 4:57:45 AM PDT by GMMAC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last
To: GMMAC

Ha ha, I have reproduced nine times and now my replicants are spreading all over the planet, including five (COUNT ‘EM!) Alouettelettes in Canada!

Assmonkeys rule!


121 posted on 05/15/2007 7:47:59 PM PDT by Alouette (It is reminiscent of the world-famous Jewish conspiracy, now extended to also include Jews.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

one of my little assmonkeys is very loud, impulsive, and difficult to take to restaurants. We don’t get out much because he is unpredictable.

Having said that...I’m going to bet he is much more likeable than these “childfree” types.

Afterall...they were assmonkeys once too.


122 posted on 05/15/2007 8:15:30 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

whoops!
I thought I was posing #122 in response to you, but responded to myself instead.
Brain cramp.


123 posted on 05/15/2007 8:17:38 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

I’d like to thank Gaby Kaplan for adding to my vocabulary...and for excusing her- (him?) -self with theatrical flair from the pool of potential parents.


124 posted on 05/15/2007 8:21:41 PM PDT by RichInOC (Stupidity is its own punishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #125 Removed by Moderator

To: RichInOC
Note that Jonathan Kay made no gender error in his article (see my comment #119) not withstanding the attempt by the two Trolls - one still here - to claim otherwise.

It pretty much proves his take on their fanaticism that they'd go to the trouble of pursuing it here (likely via Google or some other search engine) just to pathetically try to disrupt discussion of same.

About the level of creepy, cult-like behavior we've come to expect from enviro wackos.
126 posted on 05/15/2007 8:42:51 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Then Id like for these air-wasters to ask the government to relieve them of the ability to draw Social Security, as their dependency on the government later in life will depend on my child’s employment...they dont want children, but they dont mind using MY child as a slave to their failure to prepare for their old age. Id really appreciate it if they wouldnt suck off the teat of my child’s career.


127 posted on 05/15/2007 8:46:47 PM PDT by Alkhin (star dust contemplating star dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WatchDoggs

Zot.


128 posted on 05/15/2007 8:48:42 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Socialism is NOT an American value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
But someone here did say that because I do not have children I have no stock in the future of the country, therefore my voting rights should be revoked.

Then I would advise you that you use that voting right to vote into law any claim you think you will have to Social Security and any other tax-based assistance in the present and in your old age, because that tax-based assistance will depend on what my child generates in their employment in the future years. Considering that MY generation already pays out half of our earnings to take care of any and all who look to the government to bail them out, I should think youd have a problem benefiting from the labor of those 'assmonkeys' who were raised to be the government's slaves.

That is, IF you are true to what you say about not wanting anything to do with children. My child's enslavement is in your hands. Vote wisely.

129 posted on 05/15/2007 8:57:52 PM PDT by Alkhin (star dust contemplating star dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Actually, this is perfect. Liberals shouldn’t reproduce. They’re suicidal anyway, what with the abortion and euthanasia anyway.

Let conservatives hold our end up.


130 posted on 05/15/2007 8:59:32 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Ignorance should be painful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
It pretty much answers why leftists - even the unionized ones who should logically be the most opposed - are all such huge fans of open door immigration policies.

From where else can they potentially draw any future electoral power base?
Gotta keep them ol' race-based plantations a hummin'.
131 posted on 05/15/2007 9:13:17 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Alkhin

“Then Id like for these air-wasters to ask the government to relieve them of the ability to draw Social Security, as their dependency on the government later in life will depend on my child’s employment...they dont want children, but they dont mind using MY child as a slave to their failure to prepare for their old age. Id really appreciate it if they wouldnt suck off the teat of my child’s career.”

Here here!!!
Our little breeders will have little assmonkeys to worry about someday - why should they have to drag the wrinkled fannies of those bitter folks through the tail end of their lonely life?


132 posted on 05/15/2007 9:39:24 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Some famous childfree “psychos:

Mother Theresa
Jesus Christ
Lawrence of Arabia
William Lyon MacKenzie King, Canadian Prime Minister
Joan of Arc
Florence Nightingale
Susan B. Anthony, nineteenth-century suffragist
Lorena Hickok, AP political reporter
Harriet Tubman, underground Railroad
Dr. Elizabeth Blackwell, first female physician in the US
Carrie Chapman Catt, US suffrage leader
M. Carey Thomas, President of Bryn Mawr College
Ella Fitzgerald, jazz vocalist
Emily Dickinson, poet
Jeanette Rankin, first female US Representative
Margaret Bourke-White, photographer
Julia Child, French cook
Ayn Rand, philosopher/author
Rear Adm. Grace Murray Hopper, computer pioneer

Just to name a few.

To set the record straight. There is no such thing as a Childfree “Movement.” It’s all about choice. The only thing the Childfree encourage is that people thoughtfully make the decision as to whether or not to have chidren rather than just breeding without a thought of the consequences of raising them.
This may prevent those who would take out their anger on an innocent child who was concieved without thought or understanding of what it means to raise a child. People often give more thought to buying a new car than to having children.
In his original post Mr Kay stated that there were only two types of people in the restaurant; parents and daters who were presumably not parents.
He was wrong. Feedback from parents on that thread attest to that. Many parents posted opposite opinions but he never got the point. He still doesn’t.
It is not people with kids vs the childfree. It’s about manners, common sense and being happy with your lot in life.
Mr Kay and a few other responders on this board obviously do not fall into this category.


133 posted on 05/20/2007 3:40:18 PM PDT by AmandaH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson