Skip to comments.
Immigrants Safe Haven (Giuliani - 1996)
The Record (via LexisNexis) ^
| October 16, 1996
| Miguel Perez
Posted on 05/14/2007 7:35:57 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
More about Rudy and immmigration.
To: Jim Robinson; Spiff; Liz; pissant; dirtboy; indylindy; narses; wagglebee; HiJinx; gubamyster; ...
Another one for the Giuliani Truth File.
2
posted on
05/14/2007 7:36:58 PM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Did you hear him on Hannity today, giving lip service to a fence, and supposedly backing enforcement? It is so obvious he’s saying these things in order to dupe the conservative base.
Hannity no better— lobbing big arcing softballs and prompting Rooty when he didn’t hit all the talking points he needed. What a butt-kisser.
3
posted on
05/14/2007 7:39:39 PM PDT
by
VictoryGal
(Never give up, never surrender!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
4
posted on
05/14/2007 7:41:04 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: Ultra Sonic 007; jimrob
Best I can tell, only Hunter says NO to all forms of Amnesty/Citizenship for those already here as well. Maybe tancredo too.
5
posted on
05/14/2007 7:48:06 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: Ultra Sonic 007
"It's doesn't bother me if they send the criminals back,"he said.
" "But honest, hard-working people should be given an opportunity to become citizens."
Honest people don't lie and obtain fraudulent papers and SS numbers.
Only those who came here legally should be in line for citizenship. The rest can go back or live in limbo.
sw
6
posted on
05/14/2007 8:01:22 PM PDT
by
spectre
(Spectre's wife)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=20682
Radio talk-show host Laura Ingraham last week asked Giuliani about the immigration policies he supported in New York City. She asked, Are you still standing behind your sanctuary city policy?
Giuliani told her, I never supported a sanctuary policy.
That’s two bald-faced lies by Rudy, if you include him blaming Heuer for siting the ECC in WTC7 yesterday on Fox News Sunday.
7
posted on
05/14/2007 8:18:27 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
8
posted on
05/14/2007 9:12:48 PM PDT
by
Grunthor
( If you're going to call Islam a religion can we now call Auschwitz a theme park?)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Context for your "file"
Radio talk-show host Laura Ingraham last week asked Giuliani about the immigration policies he supported in New York City. She asked, Are you still standing behind your sanctuary city policy? Giuliani told her, I never supported a sanctuary policy. He said he was willing to turn over undocumented criminals to federal immigration authorities, but would not turn over illegal aliens who had not committed a crime. I agree with my predecessors, they should be allowed to go to school. And, if they were victims of a crime, if an illegal immigrant was a victim of a crime, I would allow my police to interview them and get the information about the crime and not turn them in under that limited circumstance because if I didnt do that Id have a lot of criminals running around hurting people.
http://sistrunk.net/
9
posted on
05/14/2007 9:19:25 PM PDT
by
jonathanmo
(No tag available at this time.)
To: everyone
If the report is true, this is outrageous.
10
posted on
05/14/2007 11:13:13 PM PDT
by
California Patriot
("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
To: California Patriot; pissant; Spiff; Liz; dirtboy; Paperdoll; AuntB
11
posted on
05/14/2007 11:48:35 PM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
If Rudy had run in the democratic primaries he probably would have won. Conservatives are not going to buy what he’s selling.
To: jonathanmo
He said he was willing to turn over undocumented criminals to federal immigration authorities, but would not turn over illegal aliens who had not committed a crime. Quite the parsing routine there, Rudy. This guy reminds me more and more of Bill Clinton with each passing day.
13
posted on
05/15/2007 6:31:06 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
To: dirtboy
He's not parsing. He's making a direct statement about his reasoning. In his view at the time as Mayor, he considered illegal immigrants that had broken no local crimes as a Federal issue. He considered illegal immigrants that committed a local crime as a problem for the city, and turned them over to the Feds.
This is a common thread among many larger cities. Rudy did not invent this concept. At a national level, George Bush has the same policy.
14
posted on
05/15/2007 7:20:24 AM PDT
by
jonathanmo
(No tag available at this time.)
To: jonathanmo
He's not parsing. He's making a direct statement about his reasoning.IT ... IS ... PARSING. The federal law stated that known immigration violators should be reported to the feds. Rudy filed a lawsuit to try and block that policy. And lost. Yet kept the sanctuary city status anyway.
And Bush is just as wrong as he is.
15
posted on
05/15/2007 7:26:43 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
To: VictoryGal
Did Rudy say he favored a “highly technological” fence (i.e., no fence at all) or did he have a different formulation?
To: LiveFree99
Cameras. Lots of cameras to ID those who came over, according to his interview on H&C some time ago.
No mention of an actual, physical fence, IIRC.
17
posted on
05/15/2007 7:34:38 AM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007; LiveFree99
Now that I recall it, he did just call for a tech fence. Man, what a slippery snake! And of course Hannity ate it RIGHT up.
18
posted on
05/15/2007 7:38:32 AM PDT
by
VictoryGal
(Never give up, never surrender!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007; VictoryGal
Great. With President Rudy we’ll at least have some grainy photos of masked Al-Qaida terrorists flipping us the bird as they infiltrate our country.
To: dirtboy
I'm just suggesting to you that it is not an uncommon practice that occurs throughout America today. See if we can agree on this:
All candidates will emphasize "border security," but once elected there will be little if any change in policy. All politicians will pay lip service to it, but that will be it.
The only time border security will be taken seriously by elected officials is when something big gets blown up in America AND it can be proven beyond the shadow of the biggest consiracy theorist's doubt that terrorists crossed the Mexican border to make it occur.
20
posted on
05/15/2007 7:50:28 AM PDT
by
jonathanmo
(No tag available at this time.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson