Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thompson offers apology on gay comment
AP via Yahoo News ^ | May 12, 2007 | SCOTT BAUER

Posted on 05/12/2007 8:14:41 PM PDT by don-o

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
Did Al Sharpton sign off on this apology?
1 posted on 05/12/2007 8:14:43 PM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: don-o

How about NAMBLA? Don’t they deserve a specific apology too?


2 posted on 05/12/2007 8:17:13 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
"How many times is he going to say something that's completely offensive to the majority of Americans before people start to say, 'What's going on here?'" said Jason Stephany, political director for the Wisconsin Democratic Party.

MAJORITY of Americans are gay? Since when?

3 posted on 05/12/2007 8:18:50 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
What a stupid comment. Guess businesses should also be allowed to fire adulterers if they believe it's immoral conduct.

He was right to apologize.

4 posted on 05/12/2007 8:21:54 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

This all presumes that the boss isn’t gay and might want the right to fire others with similar latitude.


5 posted on 05/12/2007 8:23:29 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
MAJORITY of Americans are gay? Since when?

He didn't say that.

Read it again. He said it's a statement that's "offensive to the majority of Americans".

6 posted on 05/12/2007 8:24:13 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: don-o

First of many compromises. Politico in training.


7 posted on 05/12/2007 8:25:43 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

When you post something like this, it would be good to indicate (somehow), “Tommy”


8 posted on 05/12/2007 8:26:36 PM PDT by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

This lame excuse(s) alone is why he will never be President.

Defcon what? Launching what? I have to go PEEEEEEEE!!!!!!


9 posted on 05/12/2007 8:29:15 PM PDT by exit82 (Sheryl Crow is on a roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Guess businesses should also be allowed to fire adulterers if they believe it's immoral conduct.

A private employer should be able fire me if they don't like the way I comb my hair. (Assuming there is no contract in force.)

10 posted on 05/12/2007 8:29:40 PM PDT by don-o (We are "THEY")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
“He was right to apologize.”

I agree that he should apologize if it’s not what he meant, but shouldn’t an employer be able to set moral standards for his team?

11 posted on 05/12/2007 8:29:54 PM PDT by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: exit82

LOL!


12 posted on 05/12/2007 8:30:15 PM PDT by don-o (We are "THEY")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Tommie Waffle gets my vote—not.


13 posted on 05/12/2007 8:30:34 PM PDT by rbg81 (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babygene
Just copied the headline. Is it really such a burden to READ the article?

Shall I peel you a grape now?

14 posted on 05/12/2007 8:31:35 PM PDT by don-o (We are "THEY")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: don-o

That was a quick flip-flop on the issue. And enough to get Tommy scratched off my list. He must want to be Rudy’s running mate.


15 posted on 05/12/2007 8:31:56 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Thompson’s “gaffe” was that he apologized. He’s toast.


16 posted on 05/12/2007 8:33:57 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge

Businesses should be able to hire and fire anybody they want. Evidently, you’re a socialist who stumbled onto the wrong site. Good luck.


17 posted on 05/12/2007 8:36:16 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Yes, and yes...

Thompson = Fred

The other guy is not on the radar...

18 posted on 05/12/2007 8:36:20 PM PDT by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I thought an employer could fire whomever he saw fit to fire if the situation merited firing.


19 posted on 05/12/2007 8:37:25 PM PDT by no dems (Michele Malkin: She's Ann Coulter with class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
"What a stupid comment."

Oh, booshwa! Any employer should be able to hire/fire any damned person he wants, for any reason that tickles his fancy.

If you want to play PC, restrict it to the public sector, then YOU get to pay for the folly that will follow. But leave private business out of your social engineering plots.

20 posted on 05/12/2007 8:38:08 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson