Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rebuilding Ground Zero
OpinionJounral.Com ^ | May 12, 2007 | Steve Malanga

Posted on 05/12/2007 6:22:52 AM PDT by Wuli

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
If the property at WTC had been his and his alone, and Bloomberg, Pataki and the Port Authority had not had the means for so much politicking about the site, Silverstein would have rebuilt the WTC already.
1 posted on 05/12/2007 6:22:54 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wuli

republicans like bloomberg and pataki don’t deserve the moniker ‘rino’.

they need to be called ‘marxists’.


2 posted on 05/12/2007 6:41:56 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom (my axis of evil includes democrats and liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Has anybody written a book about this yet?


3 posted on 05/12/2007 6:42:42 AM PDT by patton (19yrs ... only 4,981yrs to go ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Soon after 7 World Trade opened, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg criticized him for not leasing it more quickly, claiming that the developer was asking prices that were too high. Government officials publicly pressured him to complete a deal with a Chinese developer who was to be the tower's first tenant, and then excoriated him when he cancelled the deal after the prospective tenant failed to provide adequate details on its financing.

Apparently the mayor and other government officials feel it is their job to criticize, pressure, and excoriate a private citizen according to how he manages his own property. Where did they get that idea?

But since then Mr. Silverstein has managed to lease 1.1 million square feet of 7 World Trade to blue-chip tenants like Moody's, at rents that are 50% higher than what officials were urging him to accept. "I simply did not listen to all the naysayers because I was spending my money, not theirs, and fortunately I had no government involvement in 7 World Trade, which gave me the opportunity to do what I do best," he says.

That is exactly as things should be. The developer should be spending his own money, not the government's (read taxpayers'), and he should be making the decisions. We would all be better off if the government did not meddle in such matters.

4 posted on 05/12/2007 6:44:30 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton

“Has anybody written a book about this yet?”

Why? You want to collaborate on one, or don’t you figure that some writer with an established rep is already on the idea - as we speak? We could call Mr. Silverstein and ask for an exclusive?


5 posted on 05/12/2007 6:48:15 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

No, I would like to read one. Don’t have time to write it - but it would be interesting to follow the history of the WTC, and learn how the PA came to own it, how that changed the world, etc.


6 posted on 05/12/2007 6:52:35 AM PDT by patton (19yrs ... only 4,981yrs to go ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom

“republicans like bloomberg and pataki don’t deserve the moniker ‘rino’......they need to be called ‘marxists’.”

Exactly. While touting the “Charter School” movement in New York State - private not-for-profit organizations given a ‘Charter’ to run a separate public (comes out of the same government budget as a regular public school), they have allowed that movement to be used by every Marxist political group to set up their own “public” school.

In one case, the Beacon School, a Middle School teacher has been - illegally - running “field trips” to Cuba for his class, with the knowledge and consent of his superiors - and not a single word from Bloomberg himself on the issue (why would there be, after he tried to help the NYC Marxists turn the WTC memorial into a hate-America “Freedom Museum”).

Now, NYC is getting a “Muslim” public school, in Brooklyn, with Arabic and Muslim “culture” standard aspects of the “curriculum”. One does not even have to guess how much Saudi-Wahabi and Muslim Brotherhood influence will be brought into that “curriculum”.

And, we, the taxpayers, are just supposed to say: “Why thank you Mr. Bloomberg, and of course we cannot think of a better person for President.” /sarc


7 posted on 05/12/2007 7:00:01 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: patton

Yes. Search under “world trade center” at amazon.


8 posted on 05/12/2007 7:16:05 AM PDT by The people have spoken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
But once the master plan was in place, government officials did all they could to move Mr. Silverstein aside, ironically claiming that the developer must relinquish some of his control to government so that the rebuilding could move more rapidly.

It takes an extraordinary person to accomplish free enterprise in New York, especially in something this high profile.

9 posted on 05/12/2007 7:19:11 AM PDT by Pan_Yan (All grey areas are fabrications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton

“but it would be interesting to follow the history of the WTC, and learn how the PA came to own it, how that changed the world, etc.”

It “belonged” to the PA from the beginning. It was a public construction project, run by the PA, for the PA and it was 100% a PA run building until just a few months before 9/11, when they finally sold a 99-year lease on the building - just the building, not the land. The land was taken by eminent domain by a city-state “development” agency and is considered “city” land.

It was a “white elephant” building for most of its existence (part of the reason the PA did not - could not - sell a lease on it), requiring city, state and federal agencies to be cajoled into taking leases there so that it’s occupancy rate would not be a drag on the finances of the PA.

Using 100% public funds and public borrowing, NY city and state used the PA as the builder, developer, managing agent for the project.

When it was completed and ready for leasing its office space (taking much longer and costing much more than budgeted), the bottom dropped out of NYC commercial office high-rise construction market (with the millions of square feet of public financed available office space hitting the market at once).

In fact the city’s largest builder of commercial office space at the time (Carl A. Morse, Inc. - they built the Sears Tower in Chicago), left the commercial high-rise construction market in NYC shortly after the opening of the publicly financed WTC.

Had the WTC never been built, dozens of smaller builders - commercially viable buildings - would have been built with private capital and private builders all around the Wall Street area. With the publicly financed WTC bringing so much office space into the Wall Street market, the project chased a lot of the private capital away, for many years.

In fact, it was only just a few years before the PA finally leased the WTC to Silverstein - indicating, the occupancy rate could finally survive without political cajoling of politically sensitive offices - that commercial high-rise construction in lower Manhattan was having a rebound.

In addition to all of that, the construction innovations incorporated into the WTC are probably what led to its collapse and most likely would have been too expensive for a private developer to risk. But, when you are using public funds - debt of the PA - go ahead, risk it.


10 posted on 05/12/2007 7:26:39 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
the construction innovations incorporated into the WTC are probably what led to its collapse

In my opinoin, what led to its collapse, were the two airplanes that crashed into it on a clear blue September morning.

11 posted on 05/12/2007 7:31:12 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
the construction innovations incorporated into the WTC are probably what led to its collapse

In my opinoin, what led to its collapse were the two airplanes that crashed into it on a clear blue September morning.

12 posted on 05/12/2007 7:31:42 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: carton253

“In my opinoin, what led to its collapse were the two airplanes that crashed into it on a clear blue September morning.”

Yes, I know you are right, in the sense of what “caused” the WTC collapse. But, had it been built in the conventional manner that almost all high-rise steel-and-concrete buildings are constructed (which it wasn’t), I doubt that it would have collapsed from the terrorist attack on it - greatly damaged, yes, but not collapsed.


13 posted on 05/12/2007 7:41:15 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

The WTC was a Rockefeller brain child. Nelson and David were the point men, but a couple of the other brothers were also involved.

Nelson was in love with international style high rises and large public projects. He overbuilt most of the state university campuses during his long reign, and you can still see the results of his destructive urban planning mentality in Albany. People used to say that he had an “edifice complex.”

Old man Rockefeller made the family fortune, but the Rockefeller brothers were trained up as socialists. The old robber baron helped build the country but his do-good heirs have done much to undermine it since. Among other things, they pretty much singlehandedly kicked off the international population control movement, doing good by killing people.


14 posted on 05/12/2007 7:44:13 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: carton253

One contributing cause of the collapse was that they stopped using asbestos insulation part way up the buildings because of the anti-asbestos craze.


15 posted on 05/12/2007 7:45:39 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Yes, there may have been contributing causes... but the reason those towers went down was because of the planes. To get lost in the contributing causes is, in my opinion, senseless and useless. No planes... the Towers still stand.

Let's keep our eyes on the real culprit.

16 posted on 05/12/2007 7:47:48 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Your "doubts" don't mean anything to me, I'm sorry.

The towers went down because of the planes and the jet fuel.

To suggest they would not have fallen because of this or that is uesless speculation.

As for me, I really don't it to ever happen again to prove who is right and who is wrong in this Saturday morning argument.

17 posted on 05/12/2007 7:50:54 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: carton253

I think we basically agree. The reason why it’s important to look for contributing causes is that it may help avoid errors in future building construction.

There are two basic reasons to do engineering post mortems of disasters: to find or confirm the cause (Muslim terrorists flying airplanes) and to discover correctible design or engineering flaws to improve future buildings.


18 posted on 05/12/2007 8:22:19 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
That I totally agree with...

I just didn't want the abestos (or lack of it) to become more important than the planes.

19 posted on 05/12/2007 8:28:28 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All; Wuli

.

The Man Who Predicted 9/11 =

9/11 Lifesaver RICK RESCORLA, ..R.I.P.

http://www.RickRescorla.com
(The Website)

http://www.RickRescorla.com/The%20Statue.htm
(The Pictures)

http://www.ArmchairGeneral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24361
(The Rest of the Story)
.


20 posted on 05/12/2007 8:59:36 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson