Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RON PAUL, not Mitt Romney, won the first GOP Debate
Renew America ^ | May 8, 2007 | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 05/11/2007 3:15:42 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for Pro-Life social conservatives.

RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for Tax-Cutting fiscal conservatives.

RON PAUL is the ONLY 100% Anti-Terrorist candidate.

RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for National Defense and Foreign Affairs.

RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for the Bill of Rights.

RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate on Illegal Immigration.

RON PAUL is the ONLY socially-conservative Candidate defending the independence of the Christian Church against Federal "Faith-Based Socialism".

"I got to know President Reagan in 1976 when, as a freshman congressman, I was one of only four members of that body to endorse then-Governor Reagan’s primary challenge to President Gerald Ford. I had the privilege of serving as the leader of President Reagan’s Texas delegation at the Republican convention of 1976, where Ronald Reagan almost defeated an incumbent president for his party’s nomination. I was one of the millions attracted to Ronald Reagan by his strong support for limited government and the free-market. I felt affinity for a politician who based his conservative philosophy on '...a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom.' I wish more of today’s conservative leaders based their philosophy on a desire for less government and more freedom." – Ron Paul, Remembering Ronald Reagan

In 2008, I'm voting for the REAGAN REPUBLICAN.
I'm voting for former Vietnam Combat Flight
Surgeon, and Leader of Ronald Reagan's
Electoral Delegation from Texas: In 2008,
I'm Voting for RON PAUL!
"The greatest champion of conservative principles we have seen in Congress in the past quarter century."
(David T. Pyne, Esq., Vice President of the National Federation of Republican Assemblies)
1 posted on 05/11/2007 3:15:45 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; Extremely Extreme Extremist; KoRn; traviskicks; ...

Once more unto the breach, dear friends; once more unto the breach.


2 posted on 05/11/2007 3:16:43 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Chuck Baldwin, now there’s a man whose opinion is valued...


3 posted on 05/11/2007 3:17:54 PM PDT by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Ron Paul is no Duncan Hunter.


4 posted on 05/11/2007 3:18:18 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Since there have been no objections, you have just been Elected "Co-Sponsor" of the Great Ron Paul Ping List on Free Republic.

Check your FreepMail.

You now have a copy of the first 100+ sign-ups to the Great Ron Paul Ping List on Free Republic. Rally the troops whenever good news presents itself, and always be willing to add to our numbers.

Best, OP

5 posted on 05/11/2007 3:20:43 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Yet, when one looks at MSNBC's own poll, a much different picture emerges.

Of that I have no doubt. MSNBC viewers are mostly an anti-war bunch who'd naturally support Paul's anti-war views. Of course those same viewers probably strongly disagree with Paul on just about everything else....

6 posted on 05/11/2007 3:21:03 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

It wasn’t a debate, it was sound bite casting call.

Idiotic and reprehensible.

This is not the way to elect the President Of The United States.


7 posted on 05/11/2007 3:21:55 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Fred Thompson won the first GOP debate in absentia.....

His presence in the country alone was all that is necessary to win it and here are some examples:

AWESOME FACTS ABOUT FRED THOMPSON
* Fred Thompson has blasted more people in the face with a shotgun than even Dick Cheney.

* The masked executioner of Saddam Hussein: Fred Thompson.

* Every night before going to sleep, Osama bin Laden checks under his bed for Fred Thompson.

* Fred Thompson took over what was Al Gore’s Senate seat, thereby dramatically reducing the Senate’s carbon footprint. Fred Thompson then created carbon offset offsets by wastefully burning hippies.

* Fred Thompson reconsidered running for reelection after 9/11 but later decided to handle things on his own. He was soon seen entering the Middle East with a bottle of tequila in one hand an a handgun in the other. They’re still counting the dead.

* Fred Thompson once ended a filibuster by ripping out a Senator’s heart and showing it to him before he died.

* The actual cause of global warming: Fred Thompson’s burning rage.

* Fred Thompson once stood on our south border and glared at Mexico. There was no illegal immigration for a month.

* Scientists predict that when Fred Thompson dies he’ll explode taking out the five nearest planets before collapsing into a black hole.

* If you purchase a weather radio, it will wake you up with an alarm to warn you when Fred Thompson is pissed off.

* Webster’s Dictionary defines “conservatism” as “how closely one’s views resemble those of Fred Thompson.”

* Fred Thompson’s sense of strategy is so great that he can checkmate you using only a pawn and a knight.

* When terrorists get to the afterlife, they’ll find that none of their seventy-two women are still virgins. Why? Because of Fred Thompson.

* Why does Iran want nuclear weapons? Out of fear of Fred Thompson.

8 posted on 05/11/2007 3:22:31 PM PDT by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Ron Paul has an isolationist mentality...


9 posted on 05/11/2007 3:22:42 PM PDT by johnny7 ("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul is my guy, if FRed doesn't get in. I disagree with him on some things when it comes to national security, but I wouldn't expect to find a candidate I could agree with on 100% of issues. Go RP!!
10 posted on 05/11/2007 3:23:11 PM PDT by KoRn (Just Say NO ....To Liberal Republicans - FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul: Against Iraq War.

MSNBC: Against Iraq War.

There's a surprise here?

11 posted on 05/11/2007 3:23:43 PM PDT by Eclectica (It only took one TV commercial to torpedo "Mr. Conservative" in 1964 — Go-o-o-o RUDY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Ron Paul is the man of the hour....


12 posted on 05/11/2007 3:24:25 PM PDT by X-Ecutioner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
"Of that I have no doubt. MSNBC viewers are mostly an anti-war bunch who'd naturally support Paul's anti-war views. Of course those same viewers probably strongly disagree with Paul on just about everything else....

This is amazing... All of a sudden MSNBC web polls (with their primarily liberal audience) is the "trusted source" for truth.

I guess when you're grasping a straws to make a point, a short one will do.

13 posted on 05/11/2007 3:25:50 PM PDT by nctexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Ron Paul has an isolationist mentality...

Correcto. And like it or not, the world's only Hyper Power can not shrink into some hidy hole and make believe it's 200 years ago.

14 posted on 05/11/2007 3:26:09 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: X-Ecutioner

More like man of the minute.


15 posted on 05/11/2007 3:27:53 PM PDT by Garvin (Democrats dance on the caskets of dead soldiers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Look at it this way, When Paul drops out his supporters can still help out by supporting Dennis Kucinich.


16 posted on 05/11/2007 3:31:07 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Sorry, but Duncan Hunter won the first Republican debate.


17 posted on 05/11/2007 3:33:26 PM PDT by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

Funny thing about the new FR poll. Looks like more non members voting for RP than members....again.


18 posted on 05/11/2007 3:40:07 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll; trisham
And, fortunately, Duncan Hunter is no Ron Paul. He actually sees the world how it is rather than how he would like it to be.

If this were peacetime, Mitt Romney could be very persuasive. He actually understands what it takes to grow an economy in an imperfect world.

If this were a libertarian utopia, Ron Paul could be very persuasive. His idealogy is pure even if it isn't very realistic with the hand we've been dealt.

But given that this is wartime, I'll take the candidate who I feel is mean a**ed enough to take on islamofacism and their allies in the enemedia and win. A former army ranger and paratrooper who also has a decent grasp of conservative issues. Last time I checked, there was only one candidate that fit this criteria.

19 posted on 05/11/2007 3:42:47 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KoRn; TheKidster; The_Eaglet; dcwusmc
Ron Paul is my guy, if FRed doesn't get in.

If "Fred" decides to "get in", I understand you might choose to support him.
We must always do that which we believe to be Right.

(However, as long as Fred's taking to make up his mind -- we may all be able to support Ron Paul for Two Terms before supporting Fred in 2016!)

I disagree with him on some things when it comes to national security,

Let's see...Ron Paul is: Pro-Border Security... Pro-Port Security... Pro-Coast Guard.... Pro-Missile Defense... I suspect that the TRUTH is, you TOTALLY AGREE with Ron Paul on National Security!

Now, you may disagree with him on the Effectiveness of Foreign Wars -- but I say, even IF an Expansionist Foreign Policy DOES "work", let's protect our own Borders First and go from there!!

As always, JMHO.

Best, OP

20 posted on 05/11/2007 3:43:59 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson