Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

And it is not even November yet. There are still people alive who could be scrambling on this one.
1 posted on 05/04/2007 8:54:52 AM PDT by mission9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: mission9
Ranger writes:

A trial in the 1960s, led by the District Attorney in New Orleans (Garrison), centered on elements of the mafia working with the CIA as part of the conspiracy, but was unable to obtain any convictions.

Garrison prosecuted one man, who was acquitted for the very good reason that he had no more to do with Kennedy's murder than the Man in the Moon.

Many life-long students of this event are having a hard time ignoring this new evidence.

I'm not ignoring it. I don't believe it.

245 posted on 05/04/2007 11:43:26 PM PDT by Christopher Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

That I would not doubt.


248 posted on 05/05/2007 4:52:01 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

It’s been my theory for years that LBJ was behind the assassination of JFK. No one had more to gain than LBJ. Kennedy was planning to drop Johnson from the ticket in ‘64 so LBJ had to act quickly.


261 posted on 05/05/2007 8:13:02 AM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

It was well known in Texas among the “insiders” (I certainly was NOT one) at the time, LBJ hated John Connelly. I had an acquaintance in the 60’s whose father had observed a “drunk LBJ going after Connelly with a kitchen knife” and had to be restrained.


266 posted on 05/05/2007 9:04:56 AM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

So, on my deathbed, can I say my ex-wife is responsible for my son being a jerk? Who’s going to challenge on it?


275 posted on 05/05/2007 1:14:02 PM PDT by BerryessaJim (An offer not to be refused)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9
LBJ is the most obvious to gain from his death.

When power is the goal, it’s been very common, historically, for the “next” to kill the “now” to BECOME the “now.”

My father read the (farcical) “Warren Reports” back in the day—and everything else he could get his hands on about the subject. He has always maintained it was LBJ. I agree. Too simple to overlook.

309 posted on 05/06/2007 9:17:42 AM PDT by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9; sfm; G S Patton; Gumdrop; trustandhope; MarkBsnr; pblax8; oakcon; newbie 10-21-00; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Audio Clip Of Hunt's Confession - as heard on the April 28th, 2007 edition of Coast to Coast Live hosted by Ian Punnett.

The following is a transcript of Hunt's confession on the audio tape clip:

I heard from Frank that LBJ had designated Cord Meyer, Jr. to undertake a larger organization while keeping it totally secret. Cord Meyer himself was a rather favorite member of the Eastern aristocracy. He was a graduate of Yale University and had joined the Marine Corps during the war and lost an eye in the Pacific fighting.

I think that LBJ settled on Meyer as an opportunist, parent—like himself a parent—and a man who had very little left to him in life ever since JFK had taken Cord's wife as one of his mistresses. I would suggest that Cord Meyer welcomed the approach from LBJ, who was after all only the Vice President at that time and of course could not number Cord Meyer among JFK's admirers—quite the contrary.

As for Dave Phillips, I knew him pretty well at one time. He worked for me during the Guatemala project. He had made himself useful to the agency in Santiago, Chile where he was an American businessman. In any case, his actions, whatever they were, came to the attention of the Santiago station chief and when his resume became known to people in the Western hemisphere division he was brought in to work on Guatemalan operations.

Sturgis and Morales and people of that ilk stayed in apartment houses during preparations for the big event. Their addresses were very subject to change, so that where a fellow like Morales had been one day, you'd not necessarily associated [sic] with that address the following day. In short, it was a very mobile experience.

Let me point out at this point, that if I had wanted to fictionalize what went on in Miami and elsewhere during the run up for the big event, I would have done so. But I don't want any unreality to tinge this particular story, or the information, I should say. I was a benchwarmer on it and I had a reputation for honesty.

I think it's essential to refocus on what this information that I've been providing you—and you alone, by the way—consists of. What is important in the story is that we've backtracked the chain of command up through Cord Meyer and laying [sic] the doings at the doorstep of LBJ. He, in my opinion, had an almost maniacal urge to become President. He regarded JFK, as he was in fact, an obstacle to achieving that. He could have waited for JFK to finish out his term and then undoubtedly a second term. So that would have put LBJ at the head of a long list of people who were waiting for some change in the executive branch.


319 posted on 05/06/2007 12:14:31 PM PDT by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

Could stsnd as a warning to the next POTUS. Be very careful who you choose to be your VP!


331 posted on 05/06/2007 4:52:25 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( on the cutting edge,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

Most of you are partially right, but also wrong on the details. Lee Harvey Oswald did indeed shoot at JFK, but Chuck Norris went back in time and stopped the bullets with his beard. Tragically JFK was so amazed by this that his head exploded.

*Apologies if anyone already posted this*


337 posted on 05/06/2007 6:27:49 PM PDT by oakcon (America wants you: Run Fred Run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

bump for later


363 posted on 05/07/2007 10:46:07 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9
This was an inside job done by more than one person....the head shot clearly came from the front which contradicts the “report”. Any military marksman could recognize that.

The Warren Commission was established to make it all fit to Oswald and their report was bs. Ruby kills Oswald so that there is no trial end of story.

365 posted on 05/08/2007 10:12:13 AM PDT by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson