Skip to comments.
RUDY CAMPAIGN'S 'BACKER' BLUNDER (listed as backers, but never pledged support)
NY POST ^
| May 1, 2007
| CARL CAMPANILE with Post Wire Services
Posted on 05/01/2007 4:57:37 AM PDT by Liz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: George W. Bush; Condor51; stephenjohnbanker; dirtboy; Spiff; narses; NapkinUser
Giuliani released a list of 125 NH leaders and activists he claims are backing his candidacy - but a few of them say they never pledged their support. Looks like it's Panicsville at Rooty Campaign Central. Rudy's forced to use phonies to advance his political ambitions---trying to make himself look good at the expense of others.
21
posted on
05/01/2007 6:43:03 AM PDT
by
Liz
(Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
To: TommyDale
That term "evangelical" as I use it reflects the socially, moral conservative Religious Right pro-life, anto-homosexual agenda movement in most of our churches. It does NOT include the left wing church movement who accept abortion or homosexuality as acceptable. Forgivable, but not acceptable. I understand. Who were the 'evangelical' supporters that maintained the Clintons popularity at the 2/3rds level throughout their tenure? These evangelicals 'appear' and claim to be the very thing that you describe, and they are in large part still supporting and working for Hillry because they have a doctrine to fulfill.
To: Just mythoughts
I don’t know a single Evangelical who either voted for or supported Clinton. And today, I don’t know of any who would say they support Hillary. They are incompatible.
23
posted on
05/01/2007 7:07:52 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
To: TommyDale
I dont know a single Evangelical who either voted for or supported Clinton. And today, I dont know of any who would say they support Hillary. They are incompatible. My own experience is the most popular church in my area to be a member of, where their youth groups always led the prayer around the flag pole before high school and where their church always held the baccalaureate ceremony before high school graduation, turns out to be democrats, more specifically Clinton supporters.
I had neighbors that were members and were most proudly pro-life and their life revolved around being against abortion. However, I since have discovered that for some of these members, I will describe it from the top down, candidate Bush was RIGHT on the issues, but because of his speech difficulty was not the right candidate for them to vote for. Al Gore and JFKerry presented a better image as spokesmen for the US. I am not describing nonprofessionals, or rural rednecks either.
To: Just mythoughts
I guess I was fortunate to attend church where people were taught right from wrong. Once they accept truth, they have no desire to vote for the liberal Democrat agenda.
25
posted on
05/01/2007 7:31:21 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
To: TommyDale
I guess I was fortunate to attend church where people were taught right from wrong. Once they accept truth, they have no desire to vote for the liberal Democrat agenda. I spent the Clinton era trying to figure out who it was that kept their poll numbers outrageously high. I can't describe my disappointment when I discovered the support for the Clintons came from within what I thought to be those of the "religious right".
There is a commonality with a majority in secular religion and many moderate elite 'republicans' regarding the "morals voters". Everyone believes themselves to be 'right' in their religion.
Note how the term 'morals voters' conveniently got used instead of "religious right" when it became politically expedient to foleyize these voters.
To: Just mythoughts
I don’t know where you are getting this statistic. During the Clinton years, the religious right was almost non-existent.
They carried a Bible, so I guess that some Christians accepted them on face value. I began working against them during those early years because of the TV programs like “The Clinton Chronicles”.
27
posted on
05/01/2007 8:09:05 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
To: Liz
This is no surprise. Giuliani’s campaign is built entirely upon deceit and ignorance. This is not the first, nor the last, campaign deception that will be exposed.
28
posted on
05/01/2007 8:18:45 AM PDT
by
Spiff
(Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
To: Liz
Reminds me of the Katherine Harris blunders in FL when she was listing anyone and everyone as a supporter.
29
posted on
05/01/2007 8:50:44 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Liz; indylindy
Now appearing at a campaign event near you: Rudy and his Little Smokies!
30
posted on
05/01/2007 9:59:05 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
To: TommyDale
Wonder how long it will take Rootys Lil Smokies to cast you into the broiler!
31
posted on
05/01/2007 10:06:29 AM PDT
by
dforest
(Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
To: indylindy
32
posted on
05/01/2007 10:17:51 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
To: Liz
Giuliani released a list of 125 NH leaders and activists he claims are backing his candidacy - but a few of them say they never pledged their support.
I just had a thought. Maybe Rooty just got his 'lists' confused:
- People in NH who back me
- People in NH who own guns
- People in NH with guns that I have to confiscate
- People in NH who hate my guts
- People in NH who married their cousin
- People in NH who picked their wife up in a bar
- People in NH that think 'going to the country' is a trip to Central Park to feed the pigeons
- People in NH with an IQ of 30 that I can get to vote for me -- maybe
See, it's easy to confuse your 'lists'.
33
posted on
05/01/2007 10:39:00 AM PDT
by
Condor51
(Rudy makes John Kerry look like a Right Wing 'Gun Nut' Extremist)
To: Condor51
LOL——priceless Rooty lists. Maybe even:
People in NH who did not attend their son’s graduation.
People in NH married to someone who “forgot” they had another husband.
People in NH who would give their daughter money for an abortion to kill their own grandchild.
34
posted on
05/01/2007 11:01:22 AM PDT
by
Liz
(Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
To: TommyDale; indylindy
Rooty's "Smokin' Express"
.... ready to roll at a moments notice.....
35
posted on
05/01/2007 11:40:46 AM PDT
by
Liz
(Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
To: Liz; TommyDale
Rooty's "Smokin' Express" Geez, Liz. Go ahead and make my day!
Only thing missing is Juti and her staple gun !
36
posted on
05/01/2007 11:44:35 AM PDT
by
dforest
(Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
To: Liz; indylindy
That thing is shaking, but the weels aren’t moving. Who’s in there with him? Oh, no one? LOL!
37
posted on
05/01/2007 11:45:05 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
To: TommyDale
38
posted on
05/01/2007 11:45:47 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
To: TommyDale; Liz
Lets hope its still Juti this time!
LOL!
39
posted on
05/01/2007 11:46:28 AM PDT
by
dforest
(Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
To: Liz; TommyDale
If the trailers a rockin’, don’t come a knockin’!
40
posted on
05/01/2007 11:48:15 AM PDT
by
dforest
(Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson