Skip to comments.
Did Justices' Catholicism Play Part in Abortion Ruling?
The Washington Post ^
| 4/30/07
| Robert Barnes
Posted on 04/30/2007 8:59:22 PM PDT by LdSentinal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: LdSentinal; monkapotamus; NYer; All
OH I see so the Demos going blame Cathoics for ruling probably they are so out of it LOL!
2
posted on
04/30/2007 9:00:34 PM PDT
by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: LdSentinal; monkapotamus; NYer; All
OH I see so the Demos going blame Cathoics for ruling probably they are so out of it LOL!
3
posted on
04/30/2007 9:00:44 PM PDT
by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: LdSentinal
1. The Jewish justices were not voting Jewish law on this.
Actually, the Talmudic ruling gives precedence to the baby at a certain point in labor. If wither a majority of the baby or the head is out, then all means must be taken to save the baby. Otherwise, all means must be taken to save the mother.
2. If Souter and Kennedy switched, would the left have been less annoyed?
4
posted on
04/30/2007 9:03:22 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(It's WW4 and the Left wants to negotiate with Islamists who want to kill us , for their mutual ends)
To: LdSentinal
If Catholics adopted a conservative agenda, the Democrats would be finished.
5
posted on
04/30/2007 9:04:11 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Elections have consequences.)
To: LdSentinal
I don’t think it was as much their Catholicism as it was their humanity.
You might as well ask if Ginsberg’s Jewishness had anything to do with HER vote.
6
posted on
04/30/2007 9:04:12 PM PDT
by
Migraine
(...diversity is great... until it happens to YOU...)
To: rmlew
Notice, one more time, the Rats ignore the issue, instead they attack personally, those on the other side. Someday I hope soon, America needs that little boy to stand up and tell us the Rats don`t have any clothes.
7
posted on
04/30/2007 9:07:38 PM PDT
by
neverhillorat
(HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
To: SevenofNine
Hmm. More meds and sleep. Call us in the morning.
8
posted on
04/30/2007 9:07:51 PM PDT
by
TheZMan
(That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends...)
To: LdSentinal
Basics: The left despises and wants to destroy all religion, because morality stands in the ay of their agenda. There is a virulent anti-catholocism at work, but in the end all traditional religions are to be targets. There was no settled precedent for partial birth abortion, and Souter and Ginzberg are left wing radicals, regardless of religion.
9
posted on
04/30/2007 9:09:15 PM PDT
by
Williams
To: LdSentinal
10
posted on
04/30/2007 9:09:27 PM PDT
by
Fred
(Looking Forward to Impeaching the OTHER Clinton)
To: LdSentinal
I’m a proud Catholic.
This article is a disgrace.
11
posted on
04/30/2007 9:10:36 PM PDT
by
new yorker 77
(Speaker Pelosi - Three cheers for Amnesty!)
To: LdSentinal
Sure, it’s because they’re Catholics.
They’re Catholics voting their conscience.
And this is a problem because...?
12
posted on
04/30/2007 9:12:17 PM PDT
by
Vicomte13
(Le chien aboie; la caravane passe.)
To: LdSentinal
You don’t have to be Catholic or even religious to see PBA as out and out murder. Even those who tolerate early abortion see PBA as murder.
13
posted on
04/30/2007 9:16:26 PM PDT
by
umgud
("When seconds count, the police are just 10 minutes away!")
To: LdSentinal
Who cares? Partial Birth Abortion is banned. Praise God!!!
14
posted on
04/30/2007 9:17:45 PM PDT
by
no dems
(Michele Malkin: She's Ann Coulter with class.)
To: Migraine
I don’t think it was as much their Catholicism as it was their humanity.Catholicism is humanity.
Jesus walked into a world that stoned women to death for committing adultery. Most of the world has given that up, since.
To: LdSentinal
How come nobody ever says that someone voted for or against something because of their atheism? Just curious.
To: LdSentinal
Did Harry Reid’s Mormanism cause him to vote for the measure?
17
posted on
04/30/2007 9:19:26 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
(Fred Thompson for President)
To: LdSentinal
I take this only to indicate that Catholics raise their children better... I’m sure is my son or daughter were on the court, they would have voted the same way.
18
posted on
04/30/2007 9:20:15 PM PDT
by
babygene
(Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
To: the invisib1e hand
What were they first: human, or Catholic?
That’s all I’m saying.
Not to diminish what you said either. You are right on.
19
posted on
04/30/2007 9:21:00 PM PDT
by
Migraine
(...diversity is great... until it happens to YOU...)
To: LdSentinal
Did Ginsburg’s feminist background influence her vote?
Did Steven’s dementia influence his vote?
Did Bryer’s liberalism influence his vote?
Did Souter’s gayness influence his vote?
WHY YES IT DID!
20
posted on
04/30/2007 9:22:41 PM PDT
by
JRochelle
(Al Sharpton: Its hard out here for a race pimp.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson