Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Panders to Religious Right
Science Blogs ^ | 4/29/07

Posted on 04/29/2007 8:01:42 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: ilovew

Oh, and once again you insulted me. I’m getting more and more certain that is all you have.


61 posted on 04/29/2007 3:09:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (For Democrats; victory in Iraq is not an option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I did explain why it’s irrelevant. I don’t know of any definition of civil union that includes animals. Thus, the irrelevance of your question. If the definition is confusing you, though, here ya go: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/civil%20union

I looked at all the definitions, they don’t mention animals.


62 posted on 04/29/2007 3:11:31 PM PDT by ilovew (Almost a college graduate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ilovew

If all one had to do is “love” another, then someone who falls in love with man’s best friend should NOT be denied their civil rights.

Since when is sexual perversion a civil right?


63 posted on 04/29/2007 3:14:01 PM PDT by caffe (please, no more consensus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

“I don’t see why men having anal sex with men should gain anyone’s approval. It doesn’t matter whether you believe in God or Darwin, it is a perversion of human nature.”
_____________________________

Agreed ~ Well stated!


64 posted on 04/29/2007 3:16:23 PM PDT by cowdog77 (" Are there any brave men left in Washington, or are they all cowards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovew
Dictionaries don't create definitions they just list them. Who came up with that? What is the history of "civil union?" Where has it ever existed before?

The answer is that liberal homosexual activists came up with the defintion. It has no history beyond that. It never existed until the VT Supreme Court ordered the VT legislature to write it into law about ten years ago. It has no cultural basis, no religious basis and no legal basis beyond the last few years of liberal judiciary activisism.

As ridiculous as all that is if that is acceptable to the courts then it is perfectly reasonable to include animals, multiple partners or "civil union" with a patch of Spanish Moss.

My original post accurately reflects the absurdity of any kind of "civil union" being enshrined in law.

65 posted on 04/29/2007 3:22:15 PM PDT by TigersEye (For Democrats; victory in Iraq is not an option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson