Bill Clinton's Disastrous Record of Fighting Terror Terrorism by Kathy Miller

The New Media Journal ^ | April 28, 2007 | Kathy Miller

[K-oneTexas]

Long but quite an interesting article, reprising (yet again) the Clinton (Co-)Presidency's lack of action against terrorism. But then again to treat it as a law enforcement matter was possibly a little ... off the mark.

I know it goes back further but the current generation has inherited from the Clinton (Co-)Presidency a problem of momentous proportions. I'm not a big Rudy fan however he is right in saying that if a Democrat is elected we will be on the defensive (not the offensive).

[TheBethsterNH]

Great excuse to have the Clintons back in the White House!! LOL...better yet appointed an position again...the outright dishonesty with We the People is amazing isn’t it?

[traditional1]

America doesn’t care about this anymore; we’re in the midst of the Democrats becoming the “National Enquirer”, with investigation after investigation into Republicans, without any crimes being committed, without any evidence, etc., but simply to keep Americans informed with spiced-up attacks continuously trumpeted on all the MSM they can find.......

[Aria]

bump

[monocle]

If Hillary is highlighting her experience in the White House as a qualification for the presidency, she has to take responsibility for the failures as well.

[TheBethsterNH]

Even if you are not a Rudy fan, even do not want to vote for him, this article exemplifies why its really good to have him running...he sums up terrorism hitting the US very well from 9/11 and WTC 93 too.

[aShepard]

Good read!

How much of this stuff was in that all comprehensive, meticulously researched 9/11 Report???

[Libloather]

Hillary responded by saying, “We have to protect our country from terrorism — it shouldn’t be a Democratic fight or a Republican fight,” Clinton said. “The plain truth is that this administration has done too little to protect our ports, make our mass transit safer and protect our cities. They have isolated us in the world and have let al Qaeda regroup.”

The frosh Senator from NY could write legislation to fix this problem. What is she waiting for?

[kabar]

Great summary. Unless I missed it, the author failed to mention that bin Laden declared war against the US, in writing, in 1996.

[Rennes Templar]

“Clinton wanted to focus on domestic politics...”

Thus Monica et al. He was so good at it.

[RaceBannon]

I know people who honestly believe that Bill was the best president we ever had.

I am so stunned when I hear people say it.

There was never a larger crook in power, except maybe FDR

[tentmaker]

bookmark

[blackbart.223]

"There was never a larger crook in power, except maybe FDR."

True. But FDR had more balls when it came to war. Another Clinton in The White House will be a disaster for The Republic.

[Bob]

On February 26, 1993 terrorists attacked the World Trade Center during the Clinton administration. The explosion caused 6 deaths, 1,042 injuries, and nearly $600 million in property damage.

I've read articles indicating that the death toll would have been much higher if the explosion had done what it was expected to. The plan, as I understand it, was to topple one tower into the other, taking them both down simultaneously. Doing so would not have allowed any evacuation to take place.

[mewzilla]

Click on the pic...

[RaceBannon]

The more I learn, the only reason FDR fought was to empower Russia.

[FixitGuy]

Hillary will claim that she had nothing to do with what Bill didn't do.

She also wouldn't let him back in the White House..There aren't enough bedrooms.

My mistake..Bill doesn't need a bedroom..just carpet.

[blackbart.223]

"The more I learn, the only reason FDR fought was to empower Russia."

That may be. But he still had more balls than Clinton.

By the way, I am no fan of FDR. He engineered the welfare state.

[NonValueAdded]

Good job, Kathy Miller, but I doubt it will get very far with the sheeple.