Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"The four justices who either are Protestant or Jewish all voted in accord with settled precedent. It is mortifying to have to point this out. But it is too obvious, and too telling to ignore."

That takes a lot of gaul. I suppose the only solution is to have nothing but atheists on the Supreme Court? Oh, it's another "educator" flapping at the mouth? Nevermind.

Stone said it was "sad" that the justices in the majority had "failed to respect the fundamental difference between religious belief and morality."

He and every member of his immediate and extended family should be eternally mortified by this imbecilic statement. ?

1 posted on 04/26/2007 1:13:21 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Rutles4Ever

...I doubt most people would even know they were Catholic without ABC out there waving the bloody shirt around.
Looks like ‘08 is going to be a long year to be a Catholic....or a Mormon.


27 posted on 04/26/2007 2:34:16 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

Any individual that thinks anti-abortion activity is an exclusive concern to Catholics is an ass.

The small minded who crawl to the refuge of Catholic Hate as a diversion away from facing the harsh reality of the violence perpetrated on innocent new life are to the rest of us pathetic, self-indulging fools. It’s far too plain for pro-abortionists to accept the simple principle that those of us who abhor the systematic process of abortion are concerned about ‘the children’ and not what the fools perceive as blind adherence to the coincidence of religious values.


28 posted on 04/26/2007 2:47:39 PM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

The Ginzburg broad hardly votes to support “precedent”. She’s the worst ideologue on the court and consistently votes to kill the innocent and enrich the guilty.


30 posted on 04/26/2007 3:40:52 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

He served at the Court under Brennan, a bigger hypocrite than which one cannot imagine. Brennan pushed Blackmun into his opinion, because he was afraid, as a nominal Catholic, to get his hands dirty by openly taking the lead.


39 posted on 04/26/2007 9:32:25 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever
Talk show panelist Rosie O’Donnell was among the first to make the point.

Anyone lumping her in with serious people can be ignored after that point.

42 posted on 04/26/2007 9:36:20 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

Rosie is an anti-Catholic hatemonger!

And she cares nothing for the Constitution!


44 posted on 04/26/2007 9:54:50 PM PDT by airborne (Duncan Hunter is the only real choice for honest to goodness conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

The foaming-at-the-mouth law professor from Chicago would do well to explain which portions of the decision support his claim that the majority “failed to respect fundamental difference between religious belief and morality”, or be ridiculed for being unable to do so.

Guy sounds more like Rosie than a professor of law.


45 posted on 04/26/2007 10:03:56 PM PDT by Kryptonite (Keep Democrats Out of Power!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson