Posted on 04/26/2007 5:38:40 AM PDT by Liz
absolutely.
so that puts things in an official light. but, since they acted arbitrarily and cutely in declaring themselves co-presidents, does that make hillary! unofficially in violation of the constitution, since she declared herself co-president but was not offically declared co-president and does that present a dilemna in that she was not elected officially as co-president but exercised power based on her unofficial, arbitrary, and capricious stint as copresident? (and so it goes, ad nauseum; these people know what they are doing and they do it well.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.