Skip to comments.
Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?
vanity
| April 21, 2007
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 15,301-15,320, 15,321-15,340, 15,341-15,360 ... 18,461-18,471 next last
To: Jane Austen; proud American in Canada
It's an anti-freeper site, started by MadIvan, and joined by other anti-freepers who wanted to leave FR in a blaze of glory. Many of them have left, but not the way they hoped. As one of them said on one of her previous anti-freeper sites, Some of them "broke bad" IMO........LOL
15,321
posted on
04/29/2007 5:20:22 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(I've had a howlingly good week, and I'm feeling just peachy. Þ)
To: Iwo Jima
don’t recalling saying those exact words
15,322
posted on
04/29/2007 5:20:46 PM PDT
by
Mo1
( http://www.gohunter08.com)
To: mkjessup
I'm calm SF. I submit that if anyone was going hysterical in this thread with manic pleas to 'take it to private mail', and 'STFU', it's you. Frankly man, I thought you would take that figuratively....like it was meant.....enough bashing each other....apparently I was wrong......notice no one is killing each other except for you and I.......it's enough man....DU eats there own....we don't......and I apologize....
15,323
posted on
04/29/2007 5:20:52 PM PDT
by
ScreamingFist
(Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
To: DGray
Some of us conservatives simply want the government to remain secular.What you got is a government that is pro-actively and aggressively atheist.
To: JCEccles; proud American in Canada
Wideawakes is a very nice, warm, welcoming place for social liberals. It is far more selective, narrow, and unforgiving in its political outlook than FR. That's not even remotely accurate. Social liberals? Some, but not all. There's a wide cross-section of people there.
Selective, narrow and unforgiving? That's a riot. Pot, meet kettle.
15,325
posted on
04/29/2007 5:21:25 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(Some people are like slinkys, the idea of them tumbling down a flight of stairs makes you smile.)
To: JCEccles
The Bush administration is proactively and aggressively atheist? Who knew? *boggle*
To: Jane Austen; proud American in Canada
Btw, WA was started March 5. This thread, which is only about a week old, was not the cause of WA.
15,327
posted on
04/29/2007 5:22:24 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(I've had a howlingly good week, and I'm feeling just peachy. Þ)
To: Nick Danger
Do you know when the primaries are?
15,328
posted on
04/29/2007 5:22:36 PM PDT
by
processing please hold
(Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
It’s not a fraudulent statement, but we have paid and are paying a great price for the original failure to apply it to all men.
To: Rb ver. 2.0
It was a fraudulent statement at the time and were still paying the price for the founders failure to include the black man as all men. There's no asterisk in the Declaration. "All men" means "all men."
Beyond that, your post is one of the stupidest things I've ever seen on this site. You have called the cornerstone of American liberty a fraud.
15,330
posted on
04/29/2007 5:23:04 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(<------(My choice for President in 2008 - Click on my screen name)
To: EternalVigilance
You really think had they included black men as “all men”? We had had a civil war and it’s aftermath which today includes the culture of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton because of black exclusion.
To: KevinDavis
States do not have the right to violate The Bill of Rights.
15,332
posted on
04/29/2007 5:26:08 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(I've had a howlingly good week, and I'm feeling just peachy. Þ)
To: DGray
"Without morals a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime and pure (and) which insures to the good eternal happiness, are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of free governments." - Charles Carroll, signer of the Declaration of Independence
15,333
posted on
04/29/2007 5:26:42 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(<------(My choice for President in 2008 - Click on my screen name)
To: wagglebee
Actually, the WTC was owned by the NY Port Authority ... Oops. You were way ahead of me.
Note to self: Read ahead. ;-)
15,334
posted on
04/29/2007 5:27:07 PM PDT
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: Lando Lincoln
Good grief, I'm appealing to everyone's sense of thought, everyone's sense of fairness. My gosh, there are scorecards and updates on the purge. Collectively these people have posted thousands and thousands of threads and comments. They hate the far-left, the liberalism that threatens our immediate well-being.
Your post doesn't deal with the evil of Marxism except by turning what is probably an innocent, blind eye to
Cultural Marxism. You cannot ultimately defeat Marxism with Cultural Marxism. (And although it's still early in the 2008 race, if we have a Liberal GOP candidate for POTUS, we will definitely have a Liberal POTUS next time. Let's raise the bar....)
I pray you will soon be disabused of the notion that what is hated by some of those banned is the Left, it's the Religious Right they hate most of all; they're ON the Left! Pray for them--but beware.
15,335
posted on
04/29/2007 5:27:10 PM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: BykrBayb
States do not have the right to violate The Bill of Rights.That's right. That's the feds' prerogative.
To: Jim Robinson
I grant you that and agree with it’s original failure of application.
To: dmw
Sure, I’m over at Wideawakes. It’s a great place! We all meet in a secret room, and say nasty things about Ronald Reagan, Free Republic, and post our favorite pictures of Rudy.
:-) <-— See that?
To: DGray
Can you provide a shred of evidence that even remotely suggests that any of the Founding Fathers would have endorsed the abolition of prayer or mention of God on public property, homosexual marriage or the abortion of 3500 infants per day?
15,339
posted on
04/29/2007 5:29:01 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: mkjessup
You really should be more clear in your accusations. It was you, mkjessup, who posted each and every one of the following comments:
1. ADIOS TWIT!
2. Go screw yourself, you little twit
3. dont let the cat cover you up when you head back to your sandbox
4. you can follow Miss Katie right on out the door bucko
Does posting such drivel make you feel more like a Conservative Man?
15,340
posted on
04/29/2007 5:29:47 PM PDT
by
NautiNurse
(I am a proud cookie baker.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 15,301-15,320, 15,321-15,340, 15,341-15,360 ... 18,461-18,471 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson