Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?
vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,301-1,3201,321-1,3401,341-1,360 ... 18,461-18,471 next last
To: Howlin

You’re always the one who starts it, then tries to act like you’re the innocent victim. I remember the miers thread where you first pulled that on me.

Are you just trying to see how much you can get away with before you’re banned? You seem to be pulling out all the stops tonight to get there.


1,321 posted on 04/22/2007 12:09:08 AM PDT by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1313 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

As I’ve said many times now, I post that about Reagan to show that we will never, ever agree with all candidates 100% of the time. It just won’t happen.

That you’ve missed that part of my posts doesn’t surprise me in the least little bit.

So just keep asking your little questions. I’m still waiting for you to back up your lie that I said ALL Rudy supporters were being banned.


1,322 posted on 04/22/2007 12:09:28 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1291 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Who should have rightly been the nominee in 2000?


1,323 posted on 04/22/2007 12:09:39 AM PDT by Rex Anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
We got Bush as the nominee in 2000 because he was the "anointed one." He was selected by the PTB (whoever the hell they are) and proclaimed “frontrunner” and de facto nominee by the media and all pundits before anyone else could even get out of the starting gates. He was ramrodded through over the objections from the grassroots. Kind similar to what’s going on now, but it’s even starting earlier.

Same thing with Dole in '96.

1,324 posted on 04/22/2007 12:09:50 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

If you read my tagline, you’d see who I support.


1,325 posted on 04/22/2007 12:10:26 AM PDT by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1307 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

FR should thank Hillary for exposing Rudy.”

Rudi exposed himself LOL a long time ago.
I didn’t need Hillary to show me that He’s a flaming liberal.


1,326 posted on 04/22/2007 12:10:28 AM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

Is there something wrong in my statement above?


1,327 posted on 04/22/2007 12:10:29 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1293 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Yup.


1,328 posted on 04/22/2007 12:10:56 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1324 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
We got Bush as the nominee in 2000 because he was the "anointed one." He was selected by the PTB (whoever the hell they are) and proclaimed “frontrunner” and de facto nominee by the media and all pundits before anyone else could even get out of the starting gates. He was ramrodded through over the objections from the grassroots. Kind similar to what’s going on now, but it’s even starting earlier.

Bush won the primaries. This notion that nominees are forced on anyone is tinfoil. Same tinfoil that's going on now regarding Giuliani. If you don't want Giuliani, field a candidate who can garner more votes.

1,329 posted on 04/22/2007 12:11:16 AM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies]

To: Elyse; M. Thatcher
Glad you showed up because we really needed some more self-righteousness.

Isn't that the truth; you're already spent all yours tonight.

1,330 posted on 04/22/2007 12:11:23 AM PDT by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1309 | View Replies]

To: Peach; CharlesWayneCT
As I’ve said many times now, I post that about Reagan to show that we will never, ever agree with all candidates 100% of the time. It just won’t happen.

If that was your point, then it was a bad point because Reagan was strongly pro-life by the time he ran for President.

1,331 posted on 04/22/2007 12:11:23 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1322 | View Replies]

To: Rex Anderson
How old are you, 12?

Why, are you looking for 12 year olds or something?

This ain't the website for you 'Rex'.
1,332 posted on 04/22/2007 12:11:25 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1297 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

It’s the best they have, because Rudy has no anti-terrorism experience, he has no foreign policy experience, he has no military experience. He was the mayor of a large city with an even larger bloated government, with a governor and a state above him to protect him and give him outside revenue and other infrastructure. He was a small enough fish in the scheme of things that he could be petulant without to much harm, like summarily overriding the government’s foreign policy when it suited his fancy.


1,333 posted on 04/22/2007 12:11:49 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

That’s a woman posting that porn? Notice I didn’t say lady.


1,334 posted on 04/22/2007 12:11:56 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Better a democrat with an energized opposition than a leftist “Republican” with no opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 989 | View Replies]

To: Spyder
You’re the one threatening a 7-year FR poster who voted twice for Reagan, in fact never voted for a Democrat, who followed her husband through his Army postings, who continued to be strongly pro-military despite his two tours in Korea, with banishment. At least as I’m typing this, Jim hasn’t threatened me, and if it gets to that point that he bans me, then there probably isn’t much use in my hanging out here, occasionally learning good and bad from people with stronger viewpoints than my own, occasionally posting things I do feel strongly about (such as separation of church and state).

Benedict Arnold won several battles and received many medals and commendations. And then...

1,335 posted on 04/22/2007 12:12:16 AM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 948 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
Bush won the primaries. This notion that nominees are forced on anyone is tinfoil. Same tinfoil that's going on now regarding Giuliani. If you don't want Giuliani, field a candidate who can garner more votes.

That is what we are doing. It is the Rudy side that says they have the only candidate who can win, and if we don't get behind him Hillary will be President. Just see post #50.

1,336 posted on 04/22/2007 12:12:45 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1329 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Dumbass

So leave already ya carpetbagger. Opus is ready when you are.

1,337 posted on 04/22/2007 12:13:02 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Killing all of your enemies without mercy is the only sure way of sleeping soundly at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 962 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"If you read my tagline, you’d see who I support." I can see that clearly. It says Fred Thompson. This is a Rudy Giuliani thread. Why are you on this thread going after conservatives who oppose Giuliani? It would make since if this was an anti-Thompson thread, but it ain't.
1,338 posted on 04/22/2007 12:13:11 AM PDT by NapkinUser (Rudy Giuliani gets his salsa from New York City.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1325 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

They’d rather spend their time trashing the frontrunner instead of trying to boost their candidate.

Same as they did in 2000 when they were calling Bush a cokehead and pushing Alan Keyes. There are a lot of freepers who are feeling marginalized that they can’t pick a winner.


1,339 posted on 04/22/2007 12:13:15 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1329 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Immature and classless.


1,340 posted on 04/22/2007 12:13:25 AM PDT by Rex Anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1332 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,301-1,3201,321-1,3401,341-1,360 ... 18,461-18,471 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson