AP Portrayed Rudy Giuliani as Cross-Dressing and 'Gender-Bending' While Knocking Conservatives

News Busters - Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias ^ | April 17, 2007 | Lynn Davidson

[nopardons]

His wasn't the "marshal" of the gay pride parade.

As mayor, he has also marched in the St. Patrick's Day Parades, the Columbus Day Parades, the Von Steuben Day Parades, the Kosciusko Day Parade, the Puerto Rican Day Parades, the Israeli Day Parades, the Haitian Day Parades, and all of the numerous other parades that are held annually in N.Y.C.! It's what mayors and other politicians do.

[nopardons]

HORSEFEATHERS!

What you and your pals find objectionable about my posts, is that unlike you, I post facts.

[nopardons]

You already know the answer to that question.

Is this the best you can do? LOL

[nopardons]

LOL........you hit every point and then some! :-)

[Petronski]

Is this the best you can do?

Of course not. But it was all that was necessary at the moment.

[dmw]

” I post facts.”

You said that to me twice now. Why aren’t I convinced? I guess because I don’t believe liberal propaganda—not now—not ever.

Conservatives do NOT vote for liberals.

[Petronski]

Conservatives do NOT vote for liberals.

That mantra is useless when addressing liberals.

[Free ThinkerNY]

Their opinions about NAMBLA became a small minority in the 1980s. The carefree, anything-goes attitude of the previous two decades was replaced by AIDs, Ronald Reagan, the moral majority, and a return to "traditional" values. Roe v Wade compelled Christian conservatives to enter the political arena; and they quickly followed the lead of Anita Bryant in realizing the tactical effectiveness of using the newly discovered problem of child sexual abuse to attack gay men. Without bothering to consider NAMBLA's actual positions, gays groups quickly distanced themselves from NAMBLA, expelling the group from their pride marches and events. Feminists followed suit, and came to associate NAMBLA with the patriarchal society that they believed had been subduing women and victimizing children since feudal times. Most importantly, local police departments across the country saw the recently launched war on "child molesters" as not only a campaign to protect children, but also as an unassailable way to increase their funding. It is in this context of social change, political retreat, and opportunism - not in the homeland security mindset of today - that a reader is best able to appreciate "A Witchhunt Foiled."

In December of 1982 the FBI, in concert with local law enforcement agencies, launched an investigation into whether NAMBLA had any involvement in the 1979 abduction of six-year-old Etan Patz. The investigation began after authorities raided the apartments of two NAMBLA members, and discovered several photographs of a young boy with roughly the same features as Patz. In the next week two New York City newspapers, the Herald American and the New York Times, reported that the Patzes had denied that the boy in the photos was their son. This did not deter law enforcement, however, and the FBI (including a young US Attorney by the name of Rudolph Giuliani) proceeded to leak misleading information to local media outlets in the ensuing weeks in an effort to generate enough public pressure that NAMBLA would fold. The New York Post, the Boston Herald, and the Daily News - coincidentally newspapers that were all owned by Australian media magnate Rupert Murdoch - printed sensational new stories, without any substantiation, that accused NAMBLA of being a "sex club" and a "porn ring." As all of this was unfolding, the FBI reportedly offered to release one of the detained NAMBLA members if he would confess that NAMBLA had assisted in Patz's kidnapping. He persisted in his denials.

Witchhunt Foiled: The FBI Vs. Nambla

http://www.amazon.com/Witchhunt-Foiled-FBI-Vs-Nambla/dp/096154970X?tag=dogpile-20

[dmw]

“That mantra is useless when addressing liberals.”

I know, but every once in a while a liberal gets ticked off reading it. When that happens—it puts a smile on my face. ;^)

[nopardons]

In order to keep your posting privileges? ;^)

[nopardons]

You don't believe facts, because facts don't help nor further you agenda.

OTOH, you do believe and agree with LIBERAL talking points and propaganda...when it is an aid to your blinkered, biased views.

[webheart]

The libs are playing divide and conquer---and many "conservatives" are helping them.

I'm not voting for Giuliani, primary or otherwise. He won't make it out of the primaries anyway, because he is the MSM candidate for the GOP nomination. What most Rudy supporters fail to understand is that they are being sold a bill of goods by the media.

The news media sees an election coming, and of course they want McCain to be our candidate, since he is the favorite RINO in the Senate. So, Rudy decides to run, and Romney looks like he might run, so the MSM promotes them as the only viable GOP candidates. The GOP then decides which of these 3 has the best chance of winning, and lines up behind their "best hope." This is the plan of the left. They will hype the ones they want us to nominate, then tear them down if they get too strong.

These guys all have their kryptonite. For Rudy, it's pictures of being in drag. If Rudy wins the primaries, these pictures will be in every article about Rudy Giuliani, bet on it. On a deep level, people will look at them, and derive impressions, which will affect their voting. I personally get just a little ill looking at them, because he really doesn't look that good as a woman, but you can tell he's really trying. Ickk!

McCain's kryptonite happens to be Charles Keating and the whole S&L debacle, and the treatment of his first wife after he got back from 'Nam. Romney is an easy target, because he is a Mormon, and I'm sorry to Mormons, but if you dig a little into the history of the Mormon church, you find that a lot of faith is needed to believe in Mormonism. Read The Kingdom of the Cults.

Romney will not be President, Rudy will not be nominated, and McCain will probably be the next Republican President if he can beat Hillary, and if the Left and the MSM have their way, which I think they will, judging by how many people eagerly jump on the 3 chosen bandwagons.

[Petronski]

In order to keep your posting privileges? ;^)

No. In order to counter your sorry "point."

[Silly]

GIULIANI: A DRAG ON THE TICKET

[Victoria Delsoul]

LOL! Now this sounds soooo familiar doesn’t it?

It does. It involves bias, lies, and prejudice.

[nopardons]

You have yet to refute or “counter” a single word of a single post I have made to this thread.

[Petronski]

And yet I’ve still made you look ridiculous.

[Petronski]

It involves bias, lies, and prejudice.

Why not point them out, VD, instead of empty charges?

[nopardons]

Only in your own mind. LOL

[Petronski]

Projection: You must read it, learn it, benefit from it, grow and prosper in spite of it.