Posted on 04/14/2007 10:14:39 AM PDT by Spiff
Oh baloney.
You all want to make slight insinuations, but you don’t have the guts to actually print what you all are thinking.
How sad that you all have to resort to this.
Argue with his politics, but don’t make veiled insinuations about his sexuality unless you all mean it.
Is it any wonder that guys like Buchanan or Keyes can’t get elected dog catcher in this country? Its because of his kooky followers and their childish tactics.
See posts 150, 155, and 159.
This is exactly the childish behavior that I refer to.
And the comments made about GW are just like these - totally lacking in merit or honor.
If one has issues with someone - fine. It’s a free country. But if one wants to enjoy credibility outside the fringe, then one might try posting in an adult manner.
That’s my point.
Of course, being that it’s a free country, one is certainly free to act like a HS sophomore, or surround themselves with only like-minded folks, turning their backs on all who dare diagree, including friends and family.
But what a lonely and bitter existence that must be.
Corporal Maxwell Q. Klinger was born 7th January, 1936 in Toledo, Ohio. (Interestingly the actor Jamie Farr, whom Klinger resembles, was also born in Toledo, 18 months previously).
Ding! Ding! Ding!
We have a winner.
Prepare now to be insulted, in “true conservative” fashion.
And the whole christian love thing as well. Kooks can never see just how kooky they are.
Sad, but true.
Thanks for the Klinger info. :)
As one who has never voted for Buchanan or Keyes, nor sat out any election in protest, nor made any insinuations about Rudy’s actual gender preferences, I will say that Rudy’s apparent clowning around with these subjects creates an ideal (evil) context for the advancement of Cultural Marxism. Desensitizing, familiarity, experimentation. acceptance as normal.
Nowhere have I heard of any diligent efforts by Rudy to prosecute NAMBLA members or the adult molesters whose female victims visited Planned Parenthood. I’m not aware of him pushing really hard about the death penalty in NY. Prison is more of a time-out than a cure, and a costly one at that.
I am sick and tired of having Christianity insulted daily on a conservative site.
It is uncalled for, and shows the character of the people that feel the need to abuse.
It isn’t going to help the vote for the person you are supporting, so it is nothing other than offensive and crude.
Well, I’m sick and tired of the cowardly way posters on a conservative site make stupid sexuality insinuations about Guiliani because they can’t stick to actual debate and have to resort to bushleague tactics.
Its a free country however, and this conservative can say whatever the hell he wants about those that proclaim their christianity on one hand, and act completely the opposite on the other hand.
If you can’t handle that, too freaking bad.
Aw, you spoiled their whinefest - don't you understand pointing out blatant hypocracy can take all the fun out of occupying the moral high ground?
You people that support Rudy are obvious in your liberalism. You think you know Christian values, but you know nothing, just like your candidate.
If anyone is mean and abusive and elitist, you are.
Like good liberals, you cry and whine a lot when people disagree with you, but your character betrays you every time.
If you don’t like that, too freaking bad.
I’m not completely convince on who I support, I’m a big Steve Forbes supporter, and Steve is for Rudy.
I love it when a freeper runs out of ideas, that is when they call you a “liberal”
LOL
Get a new act, like actually behaving as good as you think you are.
No, Rudy is a liberal, and you must be one too. With Rudy we don’t run out of information.
His liberalism is well documented.
If you haven’t noticed, Steve Forbes isn’t running this time.
Your basis for your selection is purely pathetic.
Blah blah blah, lose an argument, call someone a liberal.
Yawn......
I know Forbes ain’t running, but he supports Rudy, so do many others I like.
Do you think that whoever your candidate of choice is would approve of you and the other posters here making insinuations about Rudy’s sexuality? Or would you just conveniently ignore ignore it?
“... well-photographed and widely documented performances — and others —”
How many others?
I don’t believe it was I who was worried about Rudy’s sexuality.
His behavior brings that kind of comment on. I, however, have said he is not a transvestite and have not said he is a homosexual.
I didn’t even fail to vote in 2006. I did not hate Foley.
Does it bother you more than me?
“I know Forbes ain’t running, but he supports Rudy, so do many others I like.”
http://thepoliticker.observer.com/2007/04/giuliani-on-flat-tax-just-kidding.html#comments
Giuliani on Flat Tax: Just Kidding
FILE UNDER: Rudy Giuliani
Rudy Giuliani, fresh off winning the endorsement of Steve Forbes, now says he was just kidding when he said he thought the flat tax was a good idea.
“I didn’t favor it, I said something academic,” Giuliani said at a press conference in Florida on Saturday, in response to a reporter asking him why he had switched from opposing a flat tax to favoring it. “What I said was,
and it was not a joke, but it was half-jocular, was if we didn’t have an income tax...what would I favor?
“First I would favor no tax,” he said laughing and turning to his wife Judith, who duly smiled back. “That would be my first position. My second position would probably be a flat tax.”
But, he said, the tax “would probably not be feasible.”
Someone should tell Forbes.
—Jason Horowitz
thats gotta hurt!
Kinda makes you wonder what Forbes is thinking now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.