Posted on 04/12/2007 9:34:44 AM PDT by Mia T
thanx again, pookie. :)
ping
ping
ping
ping
The funniest quote of the day is Hillary announcing that she would never go on Don Imus’ radio show.
Damn straight!
HE’D NEVER INVITE HER!!!!
He routinely refers to her as “SATAN - the most horrible woman in the world.”
Add her arrogance to that of Jesse - sire of a bastard - Jackson and Al - ordained a minister at 10 - Sharpton:
the arrogance of these total lowlife hypocrites is amazing.
ping
Thanks for the ping!
Mia T. Bump
We have argued elsewhere that the only way missus clinton can win elections is to run virtually unopposed, and then only if she remains immobil, hidden, mute, a prisoner of her own ineptitude, repulsiveness and criminality. But of the three, it is missus clinton's repulsiveness--her ugliness--that will do her in. The voters routinely ignore ineptitude, forgive criminality, but they never abide ugliness. Never. HILLARY!
Can a chintzed-and-powdered villain win the White House?
LEADING INDICATORS SAY 'NO'
by Mia T, 3.1.07
Flowers. What a lovely idea Miss Didi... ;)
ping
ping
thx, E.G.C. :)
You’re welcome, Free ThinkerNY :)
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will? In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst? Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival. What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.
|
So much sewage in this women’s past, where do you start? I think a good place is her unethical activities right out of college, somehow landing a job in the Watergate Investigation.
From his book Jerry Zeifman,..”In December 1974, as general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, I made a personal evaluation of Hillary Rodham (now Mrs. Clinton), a member of the staff we had gathered for our impeachment inquiry on President Richard Nixon. I decided that I could not recommend her for any future position of public or private trust.
Why? Hillary’s main duty on our staff has been described by as “establishing the legal procedures to be followed in the course of the inquiry and impeachment.” A number of the procedures she recommended were ethically flawed. And I also concluded that she had violated House and committee rules by disclosing confidential information to unauthorized persons.
He goes on in the article to outline her numerous abuses of the rules during her time on the investigation. Ugly stuff.
And that was just the beginning. Here’s hoping that Mia and the rest of us can get enough people to see the truth about this plague or this country is in very serious trouble..
Powerful stuff. No one should want this defective creature in a position of trust. Perhaps the Ds will wise up in time....
Zeifman is a rarity: A courageous, ethical Democrat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.