Skip to comments.
LIVE THREAD: NC Attorney General Announcement at 2:30pm Today (DUKELAX)
ABC 11 WTVD ^
Posted on 04/11/2007 7:46:54 AM PDT by Howlin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 841-857 next last
To: Sue Perkick
CGM should be prevented from WRITING a story about “herstory” of the case. Maybe she’ll be nominated the next poet laureate. ahem.
121
posted on
04/11/2007 10:11:20 AM PDT
by
Alia
To: maggief
Your right, it was on Easter, I don’t know why it’s registering as weeks ago in my memory.
I’d attribute it to age but I’m only 44 for crying out loud.
122
posted on
04/11/2007 10:12:20 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: Alia
I expect the Oprah exclusive playing the poor little victim.
123
posted on
04/11/2007 10:17:57 AM PDT
by
Sue Perkick
(...what I was born to do, don't have to think it through.....)
To: maggief
124
posted on
04/11/2007 10:20:30 AM PDT
by
Sue Perkick
(...what I was born to do, don't have to think it through.....)
To: maggief
Wendy Murphy is a “true believer,” as I believe Nifong is. Neither can consider that the system can be played by the guilty. To a true believer, the only way to play the system is to be rich or white. That is the reason I wish with all my heart that minorities affected by the same tactics would speak up and stand for justice. It isn’t a game. If justice isn’t for all, then it’s for no one.
The other type of believer is the kind we were. We believed the system was inerrant. It should be allowed to take its course and justice would prevail. I cannot stress the importance of being pro-active if you are ever put in the situation where your or a loved one's life is in jeopardy. You can't rely on the police, the D.A. or the system to come to the just conclusion. When the system won't even consider the possibility of the accused's innocence, then you have to go for broke and it's all-out, no holds barred.
To: Sue Perkick
Sue, I don't see how having CGM on Oprah's show would do Oprah any benefit. Oprah would be supporting a proven liar.
That would greatly harm her ratings.
Now, I could see "The View" inviting one of CGM's multiple spokespeeps on... it'd be fitting with their show format.
126
posted on
04/11/2007 10:25:03 AM PDT
by
Alia
To: Guenevere
Especially with video of one of them at an atm halfway across town!
127
posted on
04/11/2007 10:27:54 AM PDT
by
HeartlandOfAmerica
("Global warming" and "Climate Change" are the biggest hoaxes ever perpetrated by confidence (wo)men!)
Comment #128 Removed by Moderator
To: Alia
Oprah probably believes her. Wouldn’t be surprised.
As for The View, I can almost hear that man-hating pig squealing now. Maybe those vultures can take her under their wing. Somebody is going to want Crystal on their show. I just don’t want her to profit from her lies. I’d like to see her admit she lied, but I’d like to win the lottery too.
129
posted on
04/11/2007 10:32:09 AM PDT
by
Sue Perkick
(...what I was born to do, don't have to think it through.....)
To: Constitutions Grandchild; HEY4QDEMS; Sue Perkick
Fox Cable made the mistake of inviting Ms. Murphy to comment on rape allegations against three University of Minnesota football players and Ms. Murphy proceeded to speak yet again in support of the prosecution that has been a persecution. (If that’s how Ms. Murphy observes Easter, I wonder if Judas is her favorite apostle.)
Ms. Murphy whined about the football players’ immediate arrest (they had been identified by their accuser, aka the alleged victim) as compared to the “failure” of Durham police to quickly arrest some Duke lacrosse players.
Ms. Murphy called that “disparate treatment” and never mind that false accuser Crystal Gail Mangum failed to identify any Duke lacrosse player when given chances and only did so after Mr. Nifong ordered an identification procedure that Duke Law Professor James Coleman, an expert on such procedure who happens to be black (and a Democrat), concluded violated federal, state and local guidelines.
How were the Durham police supposed to know which Duke lacrosse players Ms. Mangum ultimately would falsely identify before she falsely identified them? They are police, not mind readers.
Ms. Murphy’s encouragement of rioting by predicting it and distinguishing the Minnesota and Duke case based on race and wealth not only are deplorable, but obviously ridiculous. The Duke Three were identified and persecuted (prosecution is NOT the best word) on account of their whiteness and wealth; if they were black and poor, after the DNA results came back, their trouble would have been no more.
http://z9.invisionfree.com/LieStoppers_Board/index.php?showtopic=2871
130
posted on
04/11/2007 10:33:17 AM PDT
by
maggief
To: San Jacinto
I used to watch Nancy regularly until the runaway bride case when she all but demanded a public execution of her fiance.
After it was over, no apology, no acknowledgment, nothing.
Ever since, I have not liked her.
131
posted on
04/11/2007 10:34:14 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: maggief
132
posted on
04/11/2007 10:37:21 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
Comment #133 Removed by Moderator
To: Lockbar
Who would pay any money to see her take her clothes off. She sure aint Halle Berry.Heck, she barely qualifies as Garrett Morris! ;)
134
posted on
04/11/2007 10:38:39 AM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("On 11/07/06, 'true' conservatives and 'rat traitors joined forces to bring Sharia law to America.")
To: Sue Perkick
Yet had she called him a nappy headed ho......
Or worse!, 'clean and articulate'.....
135
posted on
04/11/2007 10:40:57 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: Sue Perkick
136
posted on
04/11/2007 10:46:35 AM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("On 11/07/06, 'true' conservatives and 'rat traitors joined forces to bring Sharia law to America.")
To: maggief
I don’t in any way support Wendy Murphy (not even in her child advocacy posturing). She’s a brick shy of a full load in my opinion. She’s the kind of person where if I found myself in a room with her, I’d be looking side to side to see if anyone would notice if I backed out slowly and, once through the door, would bolt for the car and head for home.
Unfortunately, when she’s the prosecutor it’s hard to get by with. Whenever I have to watch her on O’Reilly, I say to myself, “I’ll bet she forgot to take her meds today.”
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
138
posted on
04/11/2007 10:51:32 AM PDT
by
Sue Perkick
(...what I was born to do, don't have to think it through.....)
To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping. I rushed home to be in time for THIS!
I might remind all of us that Friday is the 13th when Nifong stares into his future. LOL
139
posted on
04/11/2007 11:02:11 AM PDT
by
Carolinamom
(God is pleased to get knee-mails.)
To: Constitutions Grandchild
well...........I remember that tight lipped Wendy Murphy during Clinton’s impeachment........she was shown TO HER FACE the picadillos of Clinton and agreed Clinton was attacking Paula Jones and Brodrick. This bitch then said Paula was ugly so who cared and “why throw the baby out w/ the bath water”.
some lawyer huh.......burn in hell Wendy
140
posted on
04/11/2007 11:09:21 AM PDT
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 841-857 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson