Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should [Adult]Incest Be Legal?
Time ^ | Apr. 05, 2007 | Michael Lindenberger

Posted on 04/09/2007 11:52:32 AM PDT by Lorianne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2007 11:52:33 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I guess this was inevitable.


2 posted on 04/09/2007 11:53:50 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Should [Adult]Incest Be Legal?

sure, why not, we're close to having absolutely NO morals in this country whatsoever, why stop now, legalize adult incest, why the hell not....in fact, I'm betting GAYSACHUSETTS is the first state to do so.......

3 posted on 04/09/2007 11:56:26 AM PDT by rockabyebaby (Say what you feel, those that matter don't mind, those that mind, don't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
"State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity are ... called into question by today's decision," wrote Justice Antonin Scalia, in a withering dissent he read aloud page by page from the bench.

Darn you, you pushers of the masturbation agenda!
4 posted on 04/09/2007 11:56:30 AM PDT by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Why is it that people are surprised when dominoes start falling after some degenerate policy gets affirmed by the subpreme court?
5 posted on 04/09/2007 11:56:31 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Don’t ask; don’t tell?


6 posted on 04/09/2007 11:58:04 AM PDT by Migraine (...diversity is great (until it happens to you)...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
They have already failed to do so once. The Ohio Supreme Court rejected the plantiffs' argument that Lawrence created a new fundamental privacy right that made laws restricting consensual, private sex among adults unconstitutional. Instead, prosecutors successfully argued that Lawrence said only that anti-sodomy laws bore no rational relationship to a legitimate state interest

This is probably why you will never see a study of the life span of gays ever make it to a scientific journal. If they could establish just how dangerous the gay lifestyle is they could establish a legitimate state interest in outlawing it.

7 posted on 04/09/2007 11:58:30 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
It's very hard to read Lawrence in a way that doesn't hold out for protection of adult incest.
8 posted on 04/09/2007 11:58:32 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
Darn you, you pushers of the masturbation agenda!

LOL...that caught my eye as well. Now, masturbation being a sin I understand. But are there actually laws against it?

Secondly, I have never really considered sex between step-relations to be incest. Sure, it's gross and immoral, but there isn't any blood relationship there. Is it really incest?

9 posted on 04/09/2007 11:58:48 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Incest is still viewed as outside the mainstream. But other forms of consensual sexual behavior may gain legal protection thanks to Lawrence.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

10 posted on 04/09/2007 11:59:25 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

“Darn you, you pushers of the masturbation agenda!”

Did Scalia REALLY include masturbation in that list?


11 posted on 04/09/2007 11:59:48 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper

“Secondly, I have never really considered sex between step-relations to be incest. Sure, it’s gross and immoral, but there isn’t any blood relationship there. Is it really incest?”

I’m with you here — it’s icky and wrong and not something I would EVER think of doing even if I did have a step-daughter, but I can’t see a law against it.


12 posted on 04/09/2007 12:02:00 PM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
No way should it be legal. It would lead to tremendous confusion, such as one’s uncle is also one’s father, etc. But it will become legal if same sex marriage is recognized, with marriage available to anybody with anybody as Brad Pitt so desperately wants.
13 posted on 04/09/2007 12:02:19 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

It used to be considered unnatural. Now our enlightened society understands that the govt cannot tell us what is natural or what isn’t. Except homosexuality, that is natural. And global warming, that is not natural.


14 posted on 04/09/2007 12:03:09 PM PDT by Graymatter (FREDeralist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
Darn you, you pushers of the masturbation agenda!

Which states have laws against it?
15 posted on 04/09/2007 12:03:20 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
Darn you, you pushers of the masturbation agenda!

Now there! They're some of the most selfless folks you could ever meet.

16 posted on 04/09/2007 12:03:36 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

"When will we sheep finally be able to be-e-e-e-e-d anyone we want?"

17 posted on 04/09/2007 12:03:46 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Within another 10 years I’ll be able to marry my refrigerator and draw social security for both of us! Whoopee! What a country! Better yet, the fridge will be able to apply for citizenship and sue if it doesn’t get it!


18 posted on 04/09/2007 12:03:56 PM PDT by Eighth Square
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

this explains the Book of Leviticus


19 posted on 04/09/2007 12:04:50 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rockabyebaby
sure, why not, we're close to having absolutely NO morals in this country whatsoever...

You do realize you can have morals without making those morals laws, don't you?

20 posted on 04/09/2007 12:04:57 PM PDT by Junior (Free speech is great because it makes it easy to identify the idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson