Skip to comments.
USS Nimitz Forced Iran's Decision
Newsmax.com ^
| 4/4/07
| Kenneth R. Timmerman
Posted on 04/04/2007 6:27:10 PM PDT by Bulldawg Fan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Interesting take. No doubt, three carrier battle groups would get the attention of most any tyrant.
Now once these guys/gal are released, the Brits can deal with the statements made by their personnel while in captivity.
To: Bulldawg Fan
It’s a big target but it is a great target, STS2 SS.
2
posted on
04/04/2007 6:29:22 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Freep Fox they drop the ball on GOE)
To: Bulldawg Fan
At one point during the current hostage crisis, the British team was split up into five groups of three, with each group kept at a different military base. The Iranians would then bring several groups together and film them, to give the impression they were being held together. I'll bet each one of those trips were extra special fun for the hostages, not knowing if a Religion of Peace® brand rusty saw was waiting for them at the end of it.
3
posted on
04/04/2007 6:32:54 PM PDT
by
Condor 63
To: Bulldawg Fan; jeffers; Southack; Cap Huff
Something just went down we don’t know about....Iran it seems blinked.....why?
4
posted on
04/04/2007 6:33:55 PM PDT
by
Dog
( Residing somewhere in Eeyore's Gloomy Place...)
To: Bulldawg Fan
At one point during the current hostage crisis, the British team was split up into five groups of three, with each group kept at a different military base. The Iranians would then bring several groups together and film them, to give the impression they were being held together.They could have just kept them separate and hired Michael Moore to do a little inventive cinematography to make it seem like they were all together.
5
posted on
04/04/2007 6:34:03 PM PDT
by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
To: Dog
Like I said earlier, though it took a little longer than I expected, it takes time to put together a really good drop dead ultimatum. Iran acted more like an errant brat that had to be spoken to several times before he got the real message: Let them go, or you will lose more than a few privleges.
Meantime, in no way does our covert pressure lighten up. If anything, Iran’s desparate act will only embolden us to lean on them even harder.
6
posted on
04/04/2007 6:39:54 PM PDT
by
bioqubit
(bioqubit, conformity - such a common deformity)
To: Bulldawg Fan
It’s a task for the boomers, not for carrier groups. And one doesn’t even need to keep one in vicinity.
7
posted on
04/04/2007 6:42:40 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Bulldawg Fan
Complete and utter nonsense. This did NOT happen.
8
posted on
04/04/2007 6:43:27 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: bioqubit
This was to sudden for that regime....way to sudden. These are thugs...who don’t listen to reason....so what was explained to them in a back channel that got this result.
9
posted on
04/04/2007 6:46:30 PM PDT
by
Dog
( Residing somewhere in Eeyore's Gloomy Place...)
To: Pukin Dog
10
posted on
04/04/2007 6:47:20 PM PDT
by
Dog
( Residing somewhere in Eeyore's Gloomy Place...)
To: Bulldawg Fan
11
posted on
04/04/2007 6:49:36 PM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
To: Bulldawg Fan
There’s nothing in the article that supports the headline is there?
To: popdonnelly
I agree that the sand dog wanted a conflict but I think it would be more than he would have expected. His bosses probably shut the dog down. The Nimitz was on its way over there anyway and the Eisenhower was going to come home. I found it interesting though that when I was in the Navy, the carriers only had four destroyers with them. Now, the Nuke carriers move with up to two nuke subs under them, four destroyers and now a cruiser. Cruisers normally don’t go unless it’s a conflict situation. Maybe the sand dog understood this.
13
posted on
04/04/2007 6:56:10 PM PDT
by
RC2
To: TexasKate
I noticed that too. I was just hoping someone, somewhere along the line would clarify the headline's insinuation.
Did the USS Nimitz make 'leader-of-state-who-owns-no-ties' blink, or was it simply coincidink?
14
posted on
04/04/2007 6:57:47 PM PDT
by
the anti-liberal
(OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
To: Bulldawg Fan; Liz; Howlin
USS Nimitz Forced Iran's Decision
"When the Nimitz moves in, duck lower than this, you dumbass."
15
posted on
04/04/2007 7:02:08 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(The REAL father of Anna Nicole Smith's daughter. Hey, I've got as good a chance as everyone else...)
To: Bulldawg Fan
What has the USS Nimitz to do with anything in the article?
16
posted on
04/04/2007 7:09:53 PM PDT
by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
To: Pukin Dog; Bulldawg Fan; Dog
Indeed. Iran has Hezbullah capture Israeli soldiers, prompting a mini-war that is sucessfully spun to make Israel look like the aggressor.
Iranian-trained/equipped insurgents kill US forces with impunity in Iraq, while Bush gets blamed for every death.
Iran then captures 15 British sailors without a shot fired, parades them around for 2 weeks and then sends 'em home.
Punishment? Some UN sanctions... wow, while their nuke program advances. Global War on "terror" my backside...
17
posted on
04/04/2007 7:15:42 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
They could have just kept them separate and hired Michael Moore to do a little inventive cinematography to make it seem like they were all together.This guy?
18
posted on
04/04/2007 7:21:06 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(www.BulletBras.net)
To: GSlob
Its a task for the boomers, not for carrier groups.Carrier groups: show of force.
19
posted on
04/04/2007 7:22:43 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(www.BulletBras.net)
To: Bulldawg Fan
USS Nimitz Forced Iran’s Decision
You bet.
It’s all political.
20
posted on
04/04/2007 7:23:29 PM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson