Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fifty percent of adults would not vote for Clinton
Harris Poll via The Hill | 3.27.07 | Mia T

Posted on 03/27/2007 11:24:56 AM PDT by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: NeoCaveman
;)

 

Actually, the vote-smart trend predates 'Vote Smart.' See the Gallup poll, above.


"The power of the harasser, the abuser, the rapist depends above all on the silence of women." 1



VOTE SMART: A WARNING TO ALL WOMEN ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON

MY RESPONSE TO
'VOTE DIFFERENT'
(Obama-Apple 1984 Ad Mashup)

(YouTube video--please FReep)
by Mia T, 3.11.07






HILLARY ON THE COUCH: IS MISSUS CLINTON MENTALLY FIT?
by Mia T, 01.05.07



 

The clip then devolves into a harsh attack on the Clintons, including an image of Hillary Clinton as the Statue of Liberty with the scrawled epitaph "Stalinist Rising?" underneath.

Hillary Clinton 'Big Sister' Ad Makes Big Ripple: Creator Revealed
MTV News ^ | March 22, 2007 | Gil Kaufman



STALINIST RISING?
HILLARY CLINTON ABUSE OF POWER
(WHERE IS THE UNREDACTED BARRETT REPORT ANYWAY?)
by Mia T, 2.07.07

 




 

 

  ... with doctored, "Clockwork Orange"-like images of Clinton with her eyes propped open.

Hillary Clinton 'Big Sister' Ad Makes Big Ripple: Creator Revealed
MTV News ^ | March 22, 2007 | Gil Kaufman





It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)


21 posted on 03/27/2007 11:44:25 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks

Article didn't say that 50% would - there are 11% who don't know. You should read the article

If this holds, and Fred is our candidate then we once again will have averted disaster.


22 posted on 03/27/2007 11:45:20 AM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABELER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
50% wouldn't vote for Her!, but the remaining 50% account for more than 50% of the votes.

Anybody that would vote for Her! would vote for Her! multiple times.

23 posted on 03/27/2007 11:45:20 AM PDT by C210N (Bush SPIED, Terrorists DIED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Remember that Bill Clinton, the natural poliician, never got 50% of the popular vote. There is no reason to be complacent--if a third party candidate gets a significant number of votes, she could get by on much less than 50%, and the Republicans have to nominate someone who can unite the party and win a lot of independent voters. Whoever the Republican nominee is will be the target of the worst that the Clinton machine can throw at him.


24 posted on 03/27/2007 11:48:15 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

From your print to God's eyes.


25 posted on 03/27/2007 11:49:00 AM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Integrityrocks
Note the undecideds.

Missus clinton has to get virtually all of the undecided, which is not doable for someone with 100% name recognition and, at most, 10% clinton failure and clinton corruption and abuse recognition.

The trusty ol' hook would have been used on anyone else. Decades ago.

 

27 posted on 03/27/2007 11:58:51 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

The biggest shock for all the idiotic pundits is when they see that the majority of women both single and married would vote against Hillary Clinton.


28 posted on 03/27/2007 12:02:04 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Thanks, lady lawyer. ;)


29 posted on 03/27/2007 12:02:08 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

thanx, mmanager. :)


30 posted on 03/27/2007 12:04:29 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Exactly. Hillary Clinton is simply too mean, too nasty, too arrogant too phony, and too dull to be elected President, and the worst thing for her is that she cannot hide this horrible character of hers and the media cannot cover it for her no matter how hard they try. Her horribly annoying, nasty, and screeching voice, her wide open mean eyes, will turn the vast majority of voters away from her and at an early stage of the campaign, even before they know anything about her left wing socialist politics and huge flip flops.


31 posted on 03/27/2007 12:06:03 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

How did you conclude up from that poll that this is another close election? When 50% of voters say that they definitely will not vote for Hillary Clinton, and 36% say they will, then she is finished. Running with these very high negatives months before the primaries even begin is a killer for any candidate.


32 posted on 03/27/2007 12:09:10 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud

I agree. Hillary in a field of four other Dems is one thing, as the only Dem versus an easily-demonizable Republican it's quite another. At the moment I'd say she's a lock within her party and a better-than-even bet for the Presidency. I just got chills up my spine thinking about it.


33 posted on 03/27/2007 12:10:03 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels
50% of the voters hurl at the sight of her.




I can't stand the thought of Hillary and the Horndog being back in the White House but never underestimate these two spawns of the devil. Bubba won by a mere 43% because a few million Republicans decided to vote for the little nutjob from Texas. I can see it happening again with the RudyPhobes staying home or refusing to vote unless their candidate gets the nomination.
34 posted on 03/27/2007 12:19:13 PM PDT by KATIE-O (Rudy Giuliani - Restoring Optimism in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

So, I guess this means we *don't* need St. Rudy to ride in and save the day for us?


35 posted on 03/27/2007 12:27:29 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (A sense of humour is a sign of intelligence. Which is why liberals are so humourless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla

ping


36 posted on 03/27/2007 12:50:40 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; yoe; YaYa123; joanie-f; ...

ping


37 posted on 03/27/2007 12:51:16 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


38 posted on 03/27/2007 12:54:00 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O
bump

To avoid voting for a 'liberal,' they will place their de facto vote for a Stalinist. (That'll show 'em.)

39 posted on 03/27/2007 12:58:24 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jla

just in time. ;)


40 posted on 03/27/2007 12:59:26 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson