Posted on 03/27/2007 8:33:36 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
TRUE....just wait, Shrillary shows up on this week's, SOUTH PARK
SP Staff better, head for the tall grass.
As early as the end of June, the California Appellate Court could hear arguments on bringing Hillary back in as a defendant. In any case, the witch will under oath in depositions this year along with Bill, Chelsea, Rendell, McAuliffe, Rosen, Levin, producer Gary Smith, Larry King, Streisand, and many of the other Hollywood elite.
Our editor tells us that this week he will have done a roughcut 1/2 hour version of HILLARY CLINTON: The Fraudulent Senator. The narration was done a few weeks ago. It will be for cable TV and DVD sales. We hope that first version can raise the money to do a longer version. Unfortunately, we don't have Hollywood support like Michael Moore got.
Great news. I'm still predicting that the Hillary deposition will not happen. Some pretext will be arrived at. Or even an Arkancide. Or a judge will somehow intervene at the last minute.
But I'm keeping my fingers crossed that I'm just way WRONG about this.
Beats Terry Heinz, Hillary, and Tipper in my book.
I was in the courtroom when Judge Aurelio Munoz told David Kendall that he would not entertain any motion that would keep Hillary from testifying. "Did you understand that, Mr. Kendall?" Yes, Hillary is going to be under oath.
How the Clintons collapsed Stan Lee Media -- http://youtube.com/watch?v=LUWlxc7h5AI
Doug,
Have you seen this yet?
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200703/POL20070327b.html
Senator Clinton's Lawyers Seek to Halt Fraud Suit
By Fred Lucas
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
March 27, 2007
(CNSNews.com) - Attorneys for Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) are trying to keep her out of a lawsuit that may ultimately force her to testify under oath about an alleged violation of campaign finance laws.
.....
I found it today on Cyber News Service. Thought you might like to check it out.
Thanks for the heads up. I read Kendall's brief a few days ago. He is trying to keep her removed as a defendant. She will, however, be testifying. Kendall is trying to put a limit to her testimony.
Bill and others still remain as defendants.
Here is what is going to be revealed in court --- http://youtube.com/watch?v=LUWlxc7h5AI
She is fairly attractive but saying she is better looking than Teresa, Hillary, or Tipper isn't much more praise than saying she looks better than Janet Reno
Or Helen Thomas...
Thank you. Now let's 'splain that to the : "creep" Republican politicians who retain this guy's firm.
My my! Politics makes for strange bedfellows.
Look up the charming term: "agent provocateur".
Thanks again. Now instead of thinking of Dick Morris as a toe-sucking Clinton procurer, I can catalogue him in my mind with a marvelous French term, rife with intrigue. Sort of elevates the whole process!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.