Skip to comments.
Former President Clinton requested to testify before House Committee
Drudge Report ^
| March 26, 2007
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 03/26/2007 2:39:41 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Lets Be Frank
If I were a betting person, I'd bet he politely declines the invitation.Not a chance. He'll be in the spotlight and attention will be on him. Doesn't matter what kind of attention it is because to clinton it's all about ME all the time.
21
posted on
03/26/2007 3:43:09 PM PDT
by
barker
( A smile is a curved line that sets things straight.)
To: West Coast Conservative
They're spending money to have hearings on something they can't stop and have no control over?
The Congress can pass as many "rules" as they want to amuse themselves but they hold no legal authority to enforce them.
22
posted on
03/26/2007 3:48:00 PM PDT
by
jess35
To: AmericanDave
That is cool!
To: barker
You think Hillary would want to have his pardons dredged up again?
To: Lets Be Frank
"If I were a betting person, I'd bet he politely declines the invitation."
He'd show if he was being paid for it. Afterall, the Clintons and Rodhams got their share of money for pardons in the past. They never do anything unless it benefits them personally.
25
posted on
03/26/2007 4:43:00 PM PDT
by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
To: Shqipo
They can't stand the thought of a Scooter Libby pardon, if and when one becomes a possibility. Bunch of losarses. (sp) Actually, they love the thought of a Scooter Libby pardon. That is why they keep trying to play up the idea that Bush is considering it. Consider it a reverse slander attempt. Same reason the Democrats keep trying to implement the draft.
To: West Coast Conservative
The Republicans should demand he be placed under oath.
To: ReleaseTheHounds
""While he's there, ask him about requiring 93 US Attorneys to resign and be gone in 10 days, especially that pesky US Attorney in Little Rock.""
My thoughts exactly. I am guessing there is no chance he will appear before congress to discuss these two topics because there is little chance he would leave in a good light.
28
posted on
03/26/2007 11:14:18 PM PDT
by
volunbeer
(Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
To: West Coast Conservative
why bother...like the rest of the Lefties, if his lips are moving; he's lying! LMAO
29
posted on
03/27/2007 5:26:25 AM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: vortigern
Yeah cool, but easy to over use... LOL
30
posted on
03/27/2007 6:56:09 AM PDT
by
AmericanDave
(It's like Deja Vu, all over again............ Yogi Berra)
To: carolinablonde
31
posted on
03/27/2007 7:29:41 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
("These colours don't run, from cold bloody war." - Steve Harris, Bruce Dickinson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson