Commerce chief pushes for 'North American integration'

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 24, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

[1rudeboy]

Seems to me you would have a greater concern about the direction this country is headed rather, than trying to downplay a situation which might inevitably take those rights and privileges away.

On the contrary. My concern is having my rights and privileges taken away now because there is a (from where I sit, irrational) fear they may be taken away in the future. There is no shortage of people on these threads (not you, necessarily) whose solution to "creeping" socialism is what only can be described as "preventive" socialism.

[Toddsterpatriot]

There is no shortage of people on these threads (not you, necessarily) whose solution to "creeping" socialism is what only can be described as "preventive" socialism.

Willie logic!

[1rudeboy]

Don't knock it. It's for your own good, traitor.

[wolfcreek]

"On the contrary"


That may be true but, from my perspective, that seems like an equal and opposite reaction. IMO, most people on this forum want the same thing although, their solutions may differ greatly.
The big problem, as much as We'd like to, We can't trust to powers that be to do the right thing. We've essentially lost control. The *creeping* sensation you feel is Corporate induced socialism. (I don't think there has even been a word invented to describe it)

[1rudeboy]

The word is "corporatism," although I cringe when I hear it since it is usually used by long-haired, dope-smoking, hippy-types.

[Suzy Quzy]

Send this to Michael Medved...ASAP!!!

[Lloyd227]

".... . because they exist on a sliding-scale of reality"

I am so glad that your opinion is a minority around here.

[wolfcreek]

"corporatism,"


With our loss of governmental control to corporate interests, our Conservative belief in free-market capitalism is basically being used against us.


We feed the monster.

[1rudeboy]

If true, one would think that as a member of the majority, you wouldn't find it so difficult to explain yourself.

[1rudeboy]

Thanks for reminding me of Medved. He nailed it:

I’m sorry to sound cynical and intolerant about this stupidity, but I’m furious, actually – ashamed to be part of a proud medium (conservative talk radio) that increasingly encourages this paralyzing, puerile paranoia. The record couldn’t be more clear on the “North American Union” – there’s no one anywhere near the Bush administration, the Congress of the United States, Cabinet departments or even major think tanks who believes it’s a good idea to merge Canada, Mexico and the U.S. Yes, there was one article in the journal Foreign Affairs that suggested further reducing trade barriers and economic obstacles in the style of the European Union, but that article drew spirited opposition and condemnation from readers of the same magazine and other members of the Council on Foreign Relations. The goal of “North American Union” is far from a policy aim of the Council on Foreign Relations, let alone of the US government.

[chatham]

"This effort builds on the excellent, long-standing relations among our three countries. The response to your request is attached".

What are these people thinking or smoking , if the above paragraph is in their lead.

Mexico is at this time Invading the U.S.A. and from the slogans and comments fo their Leaders intend to take over the U.S.A. and get rid of all "OLD European GRINGO"S", wishing them dead.

Canadians just want what they can get economically from the U.S.A., and at this time are trying to split Canada.

Give us a Break.

Yeah, we really need to double or triple our welafre state with uneducated unskilled poor people.

Thanks George W. Bush ???????

I don't trust most of 'em mainly, George W. and Chertoff.