Commerce chief pushes for 'North American integration'

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 24, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

[hedgetrimmer]

Interesting to note its the 50 year anniversary of the EU,did you realize it had been around so long?

It started with a 'European Defence Community'. This is the same as the SPP's 'security perimeter'. You see the word 'community' has been tainted by Pastor's Towards a North American Community, so Bush in South America earlier this month started calling our hemisphere, our 'neighborhood'. Nice friendly words for sus amigos so as not to alarm Americans. And perimeter has marketability for its militaristic flavor....

Then the EU started going for 'economic integration' with coal and steel. Hmmmm, where have we heard that phrase before? That's right, NAFTA. And more recently 'energy integration' from the US department of State.

According to the formula, a common currency is next.

The EU took 50 years of subversion and treason. The NAU is on a much shorter timeline, it appears.

[Mase]

I think Corsi is looking to write another book and he's testing the water to see which conspiracy will sell the most copies. Which topic will bring out more moonbats who'll buy the book? What to do....what to do....

[hedgetrimmer]

Economic integration-- lets see what the US chamber of commerce with the help of commerce secretary Gutierrez is up to?

The automotive sector-led Automotive Partnership Council of North America (APCNA) is a mechanism for the North American governments to work with interested stakeholders to ensure the competitiveness of the automotive sector and address the full spectrum of issues ranging from regulation to innovation, transportation infrastructure and border facilitation. Formally establish the APCNA: by September 2005.

[hedgetrimmer]

The SPP is pushing 'energy security' as part of their policy making agenda.

Can we have security when our open border pals in corrupt Mexico make energy deals with Iran?
***

Iran and Mexico sign MoU on oil and gas cooperation
21-02-05 Iran and Mexico have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to promote mutual cooperation in oil, gas and petrochemical sectors, it was reported.
The Iranian embassy in Mexico reported that the MoU also concerned Iran-Mexico cooperation in the construction of structures and equipment in those sectors. The report added that the memorandum was signed by Iran's Deputy Oil Minister for International Affairs Hadi Nejad Hosseinian and Mexican Energy Minister Ferdinando Elizondo Barragan in Mexico.

Nejad Hosseinian and Barragan in their talks discussed Iran-Mexico relations in all fields, and voiced mutual determination to diversify relations in different domains of the energy sector.
They also exchanged viewpoints on ways to increase the role of the private and state sectors in promoting Iran-Mexico ties particularly considering Mexico's booming economy and its huge market need for Iranian petrochemical products.

The Iran embassy report further stressed that Nejad Hosseinian has been meeting Mexican officials for talks on the expansion of mutual ties in the energy sector.
He has met officials from Mexico's leading oil company Pemex for talks on bilateral cooperation in different areas of the energy sector.

http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/ntl63405.htm

[Toddsterpatriot]

Can we have security when our open border pals in corrupt Mexico make energy deals with Iran?

If we close the border, how would these deals hurt us?

[hedgetrimmer]

If we close the border, how would these deals hurt us?

Let's see, now that you "free traders" have integrated our economy so seamlessly with Mexico, integrated auto production, agriculture and labor with illegal immigration, what do you suppose Mexico would do to make up for the $40 billion in remittances every year? And the industrial complexes built down there by formerly American companies and the Inter-american development Banks criminally appropriated US tax dollars? Do ya think they are befriending( and economically integrating) a sworn enemy of the US for giggles?

[wolfcreek]

"Idiots who believe that secret plans for an NAU are in motion are idiots."


Sorry Todd, There are people in Congress and the Legislatures of at least a dozen states who have let the *cat out of the bag* so to speak. Are they idiots too?


1rudeboy, that's not a *duck*, that's your conscience.

[1rudeboy]

Let's cut to the chase, shall we? Firstly, I am concerned with my Constitutional right to be free of big government, nanny-staters dictating to me what my rights should be, and using the power of the state to limit my freedom, and having the chutzpah (but not the intellectual firepower) to claim that they are acting on my behalf, or for my own good (any clue which of the two major political parties resemble the description given above?).

Secondly, once you can establish that your concern for my right above is equivalent to my own concern (to this point a complete and utter failure on your part), then we can discuss the way forward. Conscience, indeed. You fear the things you do not understand, just as you fear freedom. The irony is that you expect the State to hold your hand, with no comprehension that the State also happens to be me . . . and I don't want to.

[AmishDude]

With Corsi and his enablers, if there isn't a conspiracy, then there's a conspiracy about the conspiracy. Well, maybe the conspiracy doesn't exist, but there must be a conspiracy to supress the conspiracy that isn't a conspiracy that the conspiracy doesn't want us to believe that it's a conspiracy that doesn't exist.

See?

[AmishDude]

There are people in Congress and the Legislatures of at least a dozen states who have let the *cat out of the bag* so to speak. Are they idiots too?

Yes. As a matter of fact, they are. And if you notice, they all cite the same information you do. It's not like they come out waving the key to the NAU executive washroom or anything.

[toddlintown]

Carlos Gutierrez = Manchurian Candidate

[AmishDude]

What subversion and treason? All of Europe wanted it and it was constructed in the open. Where the hell do you get the idiotic idea that the EU was built in secret?

[hosepipe]

[... Yup, the sooner we "integrate" with the cesspool called messico the better. ..]

Yes and commit political incest with Canada..

[wolfcreek]

"Firstly, I am concerned with my Constitutional right to be free of big government, nanny-staters dictating to me what my rights should be, and using the power of the state to limit my freedom"


Seems to me you would have a greater concern about the direction this country is headed rather, than trying to downplay a situation which might inevitably take those rights and privileges away.


You fear the things you do not understand, just as you fear freedom. The irony is that you expect the State to hold your hand, with no comprehension that the State also happens to be me . . . and I don't want to.


I see an NAU as a direct assault on my freedoms and my individuality. I don't expect ANYONE to hold my hand. What I do expect is rational conversation explaining why I should go along with this plan not, vague inferences.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Are they idiots too?

Yes.

[Toddsterpatriot]

I didn't see anything in your post that explained how a deal between Iran and Mexico hurts the US. Try again?

[hedgetrimmer]

Revisionist dude?

[AmishDude]

Every European leader for decades has been pushing for the EU. Hell, they designed the flag in the 80s and the EU is still little more than a currency and a toothless bureaucracy.

The only revisionism is on your part.

[hedgetrimmer]

Oh I forgot! Iran's nuclear development program is PLAINLY peaceful, and those british ally sailors deserve to be tried for espionage. Its great Mexico is purchasing military hardware from Russia, and Iran and Russia are bosoom buddies. Let's just forget the Monroe Doctrine! Its JUST a piece of paper! Just like the US Constitution, to the "free traders".

[Toddsterpatriot]

Unless you're claiming the energy deal between Iran and Mexico involves nuclear energy, you still haven't shown that it harms the US. Stay focused.