Commerce chief pushes for 'North American integration'

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 24, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

[Man50D]

The coalition link is a petition against the North American Union.

[taxed2death]

Yup, the sooner we "integrate" with the cesspool called messico the better.

/s

[wolfcreek]

You gotta wonder about any website that has to have a *Myth vs Fact* page. Me thinks they protest too much.

[Salamander]

"nO, Canada!" ping

[1rudeboy]

Hey, hey! Corsi's back, after milking the Compean/Ramos story for all it's worth.

[1rudeboy]

Corsi dealt with that last summer. The conspiracy was that there was no information being released. Now, the conspiracy revolves around the information that is released.

[TexasCajun]

Now we know why border security is joke in this administration and Amnesty is all the rave.

Yesterday we learned Justice doesn't even think about prosecuting illegal immigrants until after they have been caught and deported half a dozen times.

Hopefully the guv'ment will subsidize my Spanish lessons.

[wolfcreek]

"Now, the conspiracy revolves around the information that is released."


At what point does this *conspiracy* become reality?

[1rudeboy]

It won't. Conspiracies of this sort never become reality . . . because they exist on a sliding-scale of reality. So someone like Corsi, for examply, can claim with a straight face that the U.S., Canada, and Mexico will be integrated into a North American Union by 2010, and George W. Bush has a secret plan to do it, and as evidence point to efforts to make it easier to use your cellular phone in each country.

[wolfcreek]

I don't believe GW or the Gov are solely responsible for this plan. They're just bought-off sock-puppets. IMO, International Mega-Corps are running the show. They have the most to gain and insulated from public opinion. They also don't give a damn about the Constitution or any personal rights.


That a little easier to stomach?

[1rudeboy]

I will agree with you that there is a lot of money floating around DC looking for a home in somebody's pocket. I think (my opinion, naturally) that there are probably equal numbers of vested interests on both sides (i.e., for every NAU-type, there's probably the opposite).

[wolfcreek]

"for every NAU-type, there's probably the opposite)."



We can only hope there are opposing forces......keeping balance in the universe and all that.


There was an article I saw recently stating, International investors have their fingers in just about every section of the world. Today their sights are set on the US where, they consider the market to be ripe.


Is America for sale?


Look no farther than Texas Gov Rick Perry. He's been traveling the world looking for people to buy the state, one piece at a time.

[sheana]

The new STRIVE amnesty bill by Flake/Gutierrez also says something about a Security perimeter with Mexico as the first defense, or something like that. It is not a conspiracy, they want us integrated with the third world cesspool.

[expat_panama]

...a lot of money floating around DC...

Somehow this idea of powerful moneyed interests running things just doesn't wash.  When I was poor I thought that everyone would pay attention to me the minute I got rich.  Now that I'm rich I can tell you that money is highly overrated. 

[Wolfie]

Well, there's rich, and then there's RICH.

[ckilmer]

that's right. the superrich are currently running nwo agenda. these people think of themselves as world citizens. and if there's problems with the murder rate going up they can always hire their own security just like the super rich do south of the border.

[Wolfie]

Yep. They'll all be safely ensconced in their gated communities. Well, at least they'll think they're safe. One of the reasons the rest of us have to be disarmed.

[ken21]

canadians suck!

they're all over where i live. they spend the winter here.

they're arrogant.

they drive slow, impeding traffic.

no one likes them.

[Raymann]

I think Canada and Mexico should 'harmonize' their laws with ours.

Then we can talk.

If we can guarantee a continued government respect for individual rights and a continued will to fight the WoT, I have no problem with a NAU.

Think of it, 440 million people, a trillion dollar military, and we'd only have to do twice as good as the Chinese or Indians to beat them economically.

[Wallace T.]

Practically speaking, the three nations cannot be united in three years. The requirements that all travelers to Canada and Mexico must have passports to return to the U.S. are contrary to any speculation of union. Requiring such a document makes travel from, say, New York to the Canadian province of Ontario more expensive and hassling than travel from New York to Pennsylvania. It reinforces the "foreigness" of our near neighbors. Hardly evidence of any move to North American union.

However, the issue of the slippery slope is a major concern in connection with our relations with our northern and southern neighbors. The European Union is not the model that would be desirable for North America because of the considerable political differences even with Canada, despite the common British heritage of the two countries. The European Union was not built overnight, but took over 40 years to take place by a number of small steps, starting with a modest coal and iron agreement between France, West Germany, and the Benelux countries. We must not let that happen here. Our bureaucracy is bad enough without becoming even more arbitrary and capricious from the influence of Canadian political correctness and Mexican corruption.