Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Far-reaching Gun Ban Would Cripple The Second Amendment
Gun Owners of America ^ | March 22, 2007 | NA

Posted on 03/22/2007 2:28:20 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Joe Brower; DaveLoneRanger

Here we go again...

2nd Amendment ping!

Contact your representatives and tell them to block this bill!


21 posted on 03/22/2007 7:37:27 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This bill is too absurd. Federal government has zip jurisdiction to enact such a thing. Don't need a twisted 2nd amendment argument to fight this tyrannical bill.


22 posted on 03/23/2007 1:39:13 AM PDT by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The Democraps rabid aversion to guns is proof enough of ill intentions towards us. Democrap leaders are communists and the rank and file Democrap voters are useful idiots. Stock up why you can, civil war is coming.


23 posted on 03/23/2007 12:01:21 PM PDT by TexasRepublic (Afghan protest - "Death to Dog Washers!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
This is about banning guns, damn the facts.

In my opinion (which is worth everything you paid for it), all it will take is one deadly izlamo-fascist attack involving so-called assault weapons, and enough supposedly Republican Congress-critters & Prezidents will panic, and jump on the gun control 'band wagon,' to turn us all into "criminals," yet again.

Which would amount to 'd@mn the Constitution,' as well as "damn the facts," in my opinion.

(You know what? I recently talked to a federal employee who was hired last summer, by an agency of the Department of Interior, and the employee in question did not even have to swear an oath to the United States Constitution when he hired on. Now where in H@des do the d@mn feds get off, hiring people and not requiring them to take an oath to uphold "the Law of the Land?" This young man thinks the ultimate authority in his professional life is the sorry-@ss, ladder-climbing, self-promoting bureaucrat who tells him what to do. How things have changed, in just a few short years... )

24 posted on 03/23/2007 3:48:20 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Just don't call me Geraldo...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson