Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't Take Poland for Granted
The Washington Post ^ | Wednesday, March 21, 2007 | Radek Sikorski

Posted on 03/21/2007 5:14:58 AM PDT by A. Pole

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Rummenigge
LOL! your right

"Poland your a member of da family now, and we are ALWAYS loyal to da family. If you leave da family, unfortunate things may transpire, >straightens collar< capiece?"
21 posted on 03/22/2007 1:07:17 AM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge

Poland wants the pipeline to use as leverage - Poland's issues with Russia would then become Germany's issues with Russia because Polish actions could endanger the flow of gas to the West.


22 posted on 03/22/2007 6:56:45 AM PDT by Longinus ("Whom did it benefit". (Cui Bono Fuerit) Longinus Cassius Roman conspirator & general (? - 42 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86

>>we are ALWAYS loyal to da family<<

that one part made me lmfao


23 posted on 03/22/2007 7:28:08 AM PDT by Verdelet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Juliusz
nevertheless we have been trained in defensive tactics and head quoter had big defensive plans (offensive as well of course - for example Poland supposed to take over Denmark in case of war with NATO). Eastern block had plans for both eventualities-offencive one and defensive one.

Even major offensives require defensive fronts and defensive weapons. When the NAZIs invaded France in 1940, they did so on a narrow front, while the rest of their army was primarily defensive. That said, the Soviets built an army and a doctrine centered on driving across the North German Plain to the English Channel in less than a week. Warsaw Pact armies were not as well equipped because of the fear of insurrection (East Germany 1953, Hungary 1956, Czechoslovakia 1968, Poland 1981).

I'm not doubting that you were told that NATO was an offensive threat. What I'm telling you, is that the Soviet war plans never considered the possibility that NATO would invade, and were instead centered on a massive armored strike to put continental Europe under its control before American reinforcements could arrive.

25 posted on 03/23/2007 5:05:42 AM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson