Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lugar, Hunter Lock Horns on Threat Reduction (Duncan throttles a RINO)
Armscontrol.org ^ | April 2003 | Kristine

Posted on 03/20/2007 6:19:29 AM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
“The CTR program has strayed from its original purpose at the same time that deeply disturbing instances of mismanagement and negligence are emerging.” Offering fact sheets on the liquid propellant plant project failure and a similar case involving a solid rocket motor disposition facility, Hunter criticized the practice of “diverting billions of dollars from the U.S. defense budget for these activities.”
1 posted on 03/20/2007 6:19:34 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

Duncan Hunter is what a Republican should be. He is also the type of President we need now and he will continue to show that he IS the best. http://www.gohunter08.com

Hunter shows no fear against the treasonous Demonrats and their media minions. That's just part of the reason why he will make the strongest possible GOP nominee.

Just some background info on Hunter and his outspoken nature to go where not many(I don't think any) Republicans go with their spineless nature.

Hunter on Abu Ghraib(courtesyhttp://www.larouchepub.com/other/2004/3128goss_hunter_block.html : )
Probably the single loudest obstructionist voice in the House of Representatives in support of the Cheneyac "Beastman" policy in Iraq has been Armed Services Committee chairman Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.). Hunter has been able to use his position to block any meaningful inquiry into the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and at every public opportunity, has railed against those who are demanding such an investigation. He even went after his GOP counterpart in the Senate, John Warner (Va.), for holding three hearings in two weeks on the scandal, practically accusing Warner of treason.

Under great public pressure, Hunter has since held one hearing, for part of one day, and has no intention of having any more. During debate on the Fiscal Year 2005 Defense Authorization bill, on May 19, Hunter declared, "We have had enormous publicity the last number of days about the mess at Abu Ghraib. I estimated we have probably devoted as much media attention to that mess involving now, as identified, some seven personnel, as we did to the Normandy invasion. And that is an imbalance. It is time to refocus." What did he want to refocus on? "The 135,000 great personnel doing their job in Iraq."

On June 14, when the committee took up a resolution of inquiry sponsored by some 40 Democrats, demanding the Pentagon be more forthcoming with documents relating to the prison scandal, Hunter placed the 6,000 pages of the report on the abuse and torture of prisoners filed by U.S. Army General Anthony Taguba (the Taguba Report) on a table at the head of the hearing room and railed at the Democrats, "Isn't that enough for you?"


Hunter on Guantanamo(courtesy http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-033125-4935r.htm:)

California Republican Duncan Hunter held a press conference to discuss the treatment of detainees at the island jail, and spent his opening statement going over a daily menu for prisoners that included oven-fried chicken and fresh fruit.

"This is what Osama bin Laden's bodyguards will eat several times a week. Lemon chicken, rice, broccoli, carrots, bread and two types of fruit," Hunter said, inviting a reporter to come eat with him.

Hunter was digging himself out of small hole he got into over the weekend when he said on a news program that the White House is divided over whether to close the jail.

"I think they've come to the conclusion, some members of the White House have come to the conclusion that the legend now, that the legend is different than the fact, and when that's the case you go with the legend that somehow Guantanamo has been a place of abuse and you close it down and you shorten the stories, you shorten the heated debate and you get it off the table and you move on," he said.


2 posted on 03/20/2007 6:32:01 AM PDT by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. IN 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; seanmerc; Ultra Sonic 007; GulfBreeze

Ping!


3 posted on 03/20/2007 6:35:19 AM PDT by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. IN 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
In addition, unbeknownst to U.S. officials, Russia used nearly all its stocks of the liquid propellant in the country’s space program rather than destroying the fuel at the U.S.-built facility, as the two countries had agreed. Russia claimed it had to use the propellant because the facility was taking years to build, according to media reports. The plant “will not be used for its intended purpose,” according to Steensma. The Defense Department must now decide what to do with the constructed plant, in which the department invested $137.2 million.

Why would we spend $137.2 million to build a building to destroy liquid propellant when at the same time we are working jointly with the Russians on the international space station and Russia keeps having funding issues with doing their share.

It sounds like the continued government stupidity of doing something worthless or counterproductive, just so they can say they did something.

The Russians on the other hand are just sucking in US tax dollars to build provide jobs in their bad economy.

...but later the Energy and State Departments launched associated nonproliferation initiatives to tackle fissile material control, scientific “brain drain,” and the safe shutdown of production facilities for the weapons.

In other words we are funding Russian weapons research in order to keep their weapons scientists from leaving Russia to work in another country. However, since Russia keeps selling weapons to our enemies, we are in truth funding development of the weapons that are used against us.

4 posted on 03/20/2007 6:37:04 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan

There have been very few in congress to call the dems to the carpet for wanting to demonize the USA and our military for how we treat terrorist captives. Hunter almost singlehandedly shoved this manure back down their throats, while so many GOPers cowered in the shadows and other retarded ones (John McCain) joined the democrat slanders.


5 posted on 03/20/2007 6:39:06 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

Not any more, thanks to Hunter and a few others.


6 posted on 03/20/2007 6:39:57 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Lugar is a lost soul.

Hunter gets stuff done,...border fence between San Diego and Tijuana and Armor for Humvee's in Iraq.
7 posted on 03/20/2007 6:42:24 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

His soul may not be lost, but it is not hanging out in the Reagan wing of the party.


8 posted on 03/20/2007 6:45:01 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Yes, that is a Hunter mainstay. The GOP needs a leader like him. No one gets it and says it better. He is onto the threats we are facing from China and Russia along with the terrorists. With our national security being the main issue in the forseeable future and with the public being influenced by the propaganda we had better have a strong messenger who can get through to the people and Duncan Hunter is the man. He also has the strong credentials to take on national security in the election and as President. I would love nothing better than for Hunter to put Hillary or Obama or whomever the Demonrats put up and just show them for what they are and with Hunter you would get it. There is no doubt he is the man.


9 posted on 03/20/2007 6:46:05 AM PDT by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. IN 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan; TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl

Yes, and he was on Laura Ingraham's show again this AM, though I missed it.

Do either of you know if Laura does transcripts?


10 posted on 03/20/2007 6:51:39 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance; 230FMJ; abigailsmybaby; afnamvet; Afronaut; airborne; alicewonders; Angelas; ...

Join the "Duncan Hunter for 08'" ping list!
FReepmail Sam Hunter if you have a question for Duncan Hunter!
What are Sam Hunter's answers? Click here for the Weekly Answers Thread, posted every Friday!

Once again: is there anyone more qualifed to be our next COMMANDER-in-Chief?

11 posted on 03/20/2007 6:53:09 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant; All

Lugar is a pathetic RINO who sold his conservative soul (assuming he ever had one) many moons ago. He once fancied himself running for president, but had all the charisma of a mashed potato sandwich. But he's still trying to crate a legacy for himself by pouring billions of dollars into this CTR boondoggle.

BIG bravo for Congressman Duncan Hunter who has the cajones to not only put the spotlight on this farce, but to fight to put a stop to it.

THAT is the kind of patriot we need in the White House!


12 posted on 03/20/2007 6:58:56 AM PDT by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Unclear why you're posting a 2003 article. Pro-Duncan Hunter?


13 posted on 03/20/2007 6:59:00 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Yup. It may have made sense to help the ruskies in 1993, but not now.


14 posted on 03/20/2007 7:00:20 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

With all the whining "Who is he?" it is to show Hunter has been an active, no nonsense, influential member of Congress even though his face may not always be plastered on your tv like the media lovefests with McCain and Rudy. It's to show his positions and his nature. And it just so happens people should be aware there is FINALLY a Republican up that will take on the Demonrats and media. Not since Reagan!


15 posted on 03/20/2007 7:02:34 AM PDT by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. IN 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Don't know but we'll have to find out! Great to know at least Laura is giving him a chance and letting people know what he has to offer, unlike some of the other 'conservative voices'.


16 posted on 03/20/2007 7:04:38 AM PDT by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. IN 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

Umm, unlike Rudy and McCain, there are not 20 writers each day in the MSM or the CMSM (that's conservative MSM) writing about Hunter's history. They are too busy putting perfume on the turds known as the frontrunners to pay attention to conservative man who should be president.

FR will soon become a real treasure trove of info on this guy. Beats the hell out of reading 5 Rasmussen/CNN/Time polls each day here telling us a year before the primaries that Rudy can beat Hillary in Pennsylvania, doesn't it?


17 posted on 03/20/2007 7:05:08 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan

I know Levin likes him. Bennet has had him on twice in the last month. Now we need to work on el Rushbo. Hunter is Rush's kind of guy.


18 posted on 03/20/2007 7:06:12 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All
"scientific “brain drain"

That sounds like a big sucking money draining hole.

19 posted on 03/20/2007 7:22:30 AM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Lugar is a lost soul.

Although I voted for him many years ago, he's been in the beltway way too long. It's way past time for Dick to retire to his Marion County farm.

20 posted on 03/20/2007 7:39:57 AM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson