Posted on 03/19/2007 6:28:12 AM PDT by areafiftyone
As some of us were figuring it earlier - it's being confirmed.
Former Sen. Baker pushes Fred Thompson for president (Thompson supported McCain)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1798836/posts
"Among potential complications in a Thompson race is that he is good friends with McCain, a current presidential candidate. Thompson endorsed McCain for president in his 2000 bid.
Baker said his wife, former Sen. Nancy Kassebaum Baker, R-Kan., already supports McCain for president and Baker said he too might back McCain if Thompson does not run."
=====
Let's see:
1. Conservatives want to support a nominee who supported McCain against Bush?
2. The person, Baker, who is pushing Thompson's candidacy is a McCain supporter.
Anyone get a clue?
This new article is confirmation of the previous one, that they want to split the Republican and conservative vote, which would be advantageous to McCain getting the Republican nomination.
A Ross Perot play inside the Republican primary.
Surely conservatives will be smarter than ending up splitting the party, to get McCain nominated, with President Hillary as a result.
Did you also hear that Dem Strategist Bob Beckel is also trying to con Republicans to get Thompson in the race by making ludicrous statements, that the Dems are afraid of him. ("don't throw me into the briar patch, don't nominate Thompson ...ooooo we are soooo afraid of him...." -- says Beckel)
Are conservatives going to be smart or gullible and help Hillary back into the White House?
Yeah, we're gonna be smart and reject Rudy as the nominee. After all, Rudy, as sitting mayor of NYC, couldn't outpoll a carpetbagger in the 2000 NY Senate race.
You can be "friends" without sharing the same political views. Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush are friends. Ann Coulter and Bill Mahar are friends. Heck, James Carville and Mary Matalin have sex with each other.
This Rudy supporter thinks Rudy needs more effective opposition than he has now, to toughen him up. If he can't handle it, we should know that during the primaries. Thompson is the man to do that.
Having said that, my gut tells me Thompson will not run. He does not have the hunger, and despite all his skills, given his positions, I think he will be a slight to a bit more underdog against the Dem nominee, which I think will also discourage him. It will be a tough year for a GOP candidate to run, as a traditional GOP candidate usually runs. But if Thompson runs, that issue will become clearer when the candidates engage. Effective competition is good! I suspect Mitt is just too damaged to fill that role, and McCain, well, he is a very risky scheme indeed, in a host of ways, and in some ways I admire the man, but not as president, and not as the GOP nominee.
Do you find this debate about GOP nominees on this site as empty as I do? Probably not. And so it goes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.