Skip to comments.
The DC Gun Ban
Texas Straight Talk ^
| 03/12/07
| Ron Paul
Posted on 03/12/2007 3:16:27 PM PDT by KDD
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
03/12/2007 3:16:29 PM PDT
by
KDD
To: KDD
2
posted on
03/12/2007 3:27:02 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
To: Enterprise
3
posted on
03/12/2007 3:33:41 PM PDT
by
KDD
(Ron Paul for President)
To: KDD
You ever been to DC? You better have a gun with you.
4
posted on
03/12/2007 3:53:05 PM PDT
by
RC2
To: KDD
Only Ron Paul would take a clear and undeniable victory like this and whine about it.
"It appears the Court rejected the District of Columbia 's nonsensical argument that the 2nd Amendment confers only a "collective right,"..."
There's no "appears to" about - the Appeals Court was explicit in their rejection of both the "collective right" and "sophisticated collective right" theories; they also slammed the 9th Circus for its contorted logic in Silveira v Lockyer.
5
posted on
03/12/2007 4:26:25 PM PDT
by
Redbob
To: RC2
You ever been to DC? You better have a gun with you
Try to cover up your license plate too, they make a good part of their money off out of towners going through their speed trap camera's.
6
posted on
03/12/2007 4:28:27 PM PDT
by
sgtbono2002
(I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
To: KDD
Nice to see some constitutional application of the law, especially in this town.
To: KDD
Lock and Load Freedom bump to all! I love the smell of victory.
To: KDD
Now we need McCain, Guiliani, and Romney's thoughts on the decision... ; )
To: Redbob
I detected no whining. Perhaps you're projecting.
10
posted on
03/12/2007 5:10:09 PM PDT
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: KDD; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; Extremely Extreme Extremist; KoRn; traviskicks; ..
11
posted on
03/12/2007 5:35:03 PM PDT
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: RC2
You ever been to DC? You better have a gun with you.,
Two responses to this:
1. Don't take a gun into the confines of the District of Columbia. This court decision notwithstanding, they will crucify you. Do you want a felony conviction on your record?
2. Don't go to DC at all, unless you want to see the tourist sites during the day. "During the day" is accented.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
To: KDD
RP picked a great topic this week and gave a good summary of the issue and his own stance.
Unarmed liberty will be short-lived, as RP points out. It is the classic American position.
To: KDD
Ron Paul is spot on once again. If this guy hits any more home runs, they're going to have to move the fence back.
15
posted on
03/12/2007 6:21:16 PM PDT
by
mysterio
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Tyrants from Hitler to Mao to Stalin have sought to disarm their own citizens, for the simple reason that unarmed people are easier to control.Got that right.
16
posted on
03/12/2007 6:33:30 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: KDD
From the article:
"This is the principle so often ignored by both sides in the gun control debate. Only armed citizens can resist tyrannical government."
This needs to be repeated; Too many pro-gunners exclusively refer to the crime prevention aspect of the 2nd ammendment when a quick study of the founding fathers indicate that the primary purpose of the RKBA was to allow a resistance to corrupt governments.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
18
posted on
03/12/2007 8:16:23 PM PDT
by
The_Eaglet
(Stop RepubliCrat liberalism)
To: OldPossum
2. Don't go to DC at all, unless you want to see the tourist sites during the day. "During the day" is accented.Which reminds me--is Patrick Kennedy out of rehab?
19
posted on
03/12/2007 9:22:56 PM PDT
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: KDD
Only armed citizens can resist tyrannical government.Only citizens, in fact, are armed. Anybody who is disarmed involuntarily, isn't a citizen, but a subject, by definition (no matter what they call themselves...)
the infowarrior
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson