Posted on 03/10/2007 9:24:06 PM PST by Angel
The irony is posted photos of Guliani now out number those of Coulter. While not exactly my taste, I have to admit that at least Rudy has a figure.
Once upon a time on FR, people got banned for SPAMMING. Now, some people are not only allowed to break every single rule FR has ever has, but egged on to do so.
Propaganda, things taken completely out of context, and lies SPAMMED to thread after thread doesn't make any of it true.
SPAM, SPAM, SPAM, SPAM......................
Hey SPAMMY.....having fun, are you? LOL
And he's better looking than she is! :-)
"is that it? is this the best this author's got?"
The piece mentioned much more than executive power that would keep me from voting for Rudy.
He still looked stupid. Ronald Reagan never wore a dress.
As far as calling me and this phantom army of "my ilk" you referred to - I am not allied with anyone and I don't belong to any Anti-Rudy network or conspiracy.
When I first saw the title of this thread, that ridiculous image of him dressed in drag immediately came to mind.
I won't support him for a myriad of reasons: abortion, gun control, and homosexual "marriage" all being part and parcel of the reasons why.
|
Giuliani | Clinton | Dem Platform | GOP Platform |
---|---|---|---|---|
Abortion on Demand | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Partial Birth Abortion | Supports Opposed NY ban | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Roe v. Wade | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Taxpayer Funded Abortions | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Embryonic Stem Cell Research | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Federal Marriage Amendment | Opposes | Opposes | Opposes Defined at state level | Supports |
Gay Domestic Partnership/ Civil Unions | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Openly Gay Military | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Defense of Marriage Act | Opposes | Opposes | Opposes | Supports |
Amnesty for Illegal Aliens | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Special Path to Citizenship for Illegal Aliens | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Tough Penalties for Employers of Illegal Aliens | Opposes | Opposes | Opposes | Supports |
Sanctuary Cities/ Ignoring Immigration Law | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Protecting 2nd Amendment | Opposes | Opposes | Opposes Supports bans | Supports |
Confiscating Guns | Supports Confiscated as mayor. Even bragged. | Supports | Supports Supports bans | Opposes |
'Assault' Weapons Ban | Supports | Supports | Supports | |
Frivolous Lawsuits Against Gun Makers | Supports Filed One Himself | Supports | Opposes | |
Gun Registration/Licenses | Supports | Supports | Opposes | |
War in Afghanistan | Supports | Supports Voted for it | Supports | Supports |
War in Iraq | Supports | Supports Voted for it | Supports Weak support | Supports |
Patriot Act | Supports | Supports Voted for it 2001 & 2006 | Opposes | Supports |
He belonged to the BOHEMIAN GROVE and I know that THEY dress up in all kinds of costumes and it isn't for charity.
It wouldn't surprise me, in the least, if Reagan dressed up in all kinds of costumes, to do skits, when governor of California. Most of these charity dinners, involving politicos and the MSM used to be kept quite and out of sight of the general public.
Chicago has the same kind of dinner & show, every year. That only became known to the public in very recent time.
America's best and oldest boarding schools hand colleges had HAIRY LEG SHOWS, from the time we were just a bunch of colonies and do to this day. It has, by this time, filtered down through ALL social strata, with public high schools and state colleges having them, for many decades, now.
Pssssssssssssssssssst.......he was SUPPOSED TO LOOK SILLY! This is a burlesque, in the original meaning of the word.
By posting that picture, you became a full member of FR's Rudy pictures in costume "army".
Anyone attempting to use that picture or similar ones, to impugn and defame Rudy ( especially those who don't know anything at all about the origins of same ) is doing him/herself a disservice and making FR look ridiculous to boot.
:)
Thank you.
I'd support Thompson, Rice, Hunter, Gingrich, King of Iowa, or Tancredo. I think they have good credentials philosophically.
I'd even support Rudy in second place with any of the above.
But I have misgivings about voting for a man who wants to take away my guns, has no problem with abortion, supports illegal invaders, has no demonstrated track record or first hand knowledge of foreign policy or military matters and has demostrated such an obtuseness in situations where he was so obviously wrong.
But NEVER is not really an acceptable word in politics. There is still a lot of time to contemplate and see how things "shake out".
AS for HIllery versus Obama, I think there is a fundamental difference between the two, even though I am no fan of Obama's by a long stretch. And that is that the Clintons would KILL - LITERALLY to get elected, and her husband and she probably have done so already in the past.
I have plenty of fresh air where I live and my very own, unpolluted, extremely deep ( many hundreds of feet deep ) well for water. My water is probably a whole lot purer than the water you drink, pet. :-)
Show me a photo of him in one. Otherwise, stop overreaching.
You didn't even refute what I said about Giuliani's liberal record on the issues of homosexual "marriage", gun control, and abortion (the slaughter of the innocent).
That speaks volumes.
I told you - I won't support him for that. Wearing a dress is simply grist for the mill. I will not even touch his serial marriages.
Moreover, let's discuss something called "politics." His decision to dress up in drag was a terrible one. Let me ask you, if Edwards dressed up as a woman, people on this board would slaughter him over it. I have news for you - the Democrats will also.
Face it - that decision by Rudy was his Michael Dukakis moment.
In politics, you don't do things like this and not expect it to haunt you:
The wise in heart shall be called prudent: and he that is sweet in words, shall attain to greater things.
Proverbs 16:21
The depth of the well rarely has anything to do with purity, in fact, given you location, you are probably drinking water that is quite high in sodium. Municiple water systems are required to meet federal systems, private wells are not. Any claims of purity are just pure wishful thinking. Deep wells are, however, far better than surface water wells.
It's simply pathetic that all these liberals are allowed to remain here on FR attacking conservatives as a way to compare their liberal candidate.
Let's face it, Rusy is a horrendous GOP candidate, and all those who support him are either uninformed or not conservatives. Sure, FR can tolerate the uninformed for a time, buit there is no place on FR for anti-conservative trolls.
The reason he should be president:
He can win.
tagline update
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.