Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/10/2007 10:55:16 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: joesbucks
There are hundreds, yea thousands of lefty pundits that are
just as shrill as Coulter. The problem is that the left is
not used to receiving its' own medicine. Keep on firing away
Ann. Annie KEEP you gun! ....JJ61
35 posted on 03/10/2007 11:49:41 AM PST by JerseyJohn61 (Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks
Well, most think that the left are being whiny drama queens about it.
39 posted on 03/10/2007 12:21:06 PM PST by Darksheare (She had the face of a trucker. She used it as a purse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks


What if Ann Coulter were a liberal? Then no one would have said anything about her comments.


40 posted on 03/10/2007 12:23:05 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

What is this Vanity Saturday? Hey what if Ann Coulter is a Faggot?


41 posted on 03/10/2007 12:33:46 PM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks
If Coulter were a liberal she'd be invited to sit at Jimmah's table at the dem convention.
42 posted on 03/10/2007 12:34:42 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

She didn't step over a line. The masses who condemn her as though she were serious are the ones who stepped over the line.


43 posted on 03/10/2007 12:44:39 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

Well, that comment wouldn't make sense to me. Why? Because conservatives have balls? [Ring] That's Michelle Malkin calling. I'll put her on speaker.


44 posted on 03/10/2007 12:57:20 PM PST by drubyfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks
The comment made at CPAC recently was one of those times where she stepped over the line...

Exactly who's line are we talking about here? She was making a point about how someone else's use of a word (faggot) landed them in rehab. She did not cross over any line as far as I'm concerned. Liberals do far far worse on a daily basis and get a complete pass all the time. The politically correct crowd can go scr#w themselves as far as I'm concerned. And let's face it, Edwards isn't exactly what you'd call a manly guy. Perhaps Ann should use less politiclly charged language next time, like "Pretty Boy," "Pansy," or "Candy A$$"

Jag!


45 posted on 03/10/2007 12:57:34 PM PST by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks
Ann Coulter did not go over any line.

She did what she does so very well. She set up a linguistic trap and Rinos and Libs jumped into it, lying on the floor in the touild of her net screaming, wailing, excoriating and indisputable proving her point.

She does it and they fall for it every single time.

46 posted on 03/10/2007 3:12:52 PM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

The word faggot hit such a deep cord because the shallow chested liberals know at a deep level that it is a perfect descriptor for their men-folk.


47 posted on 03/10/2007 3:19:56 PM PST by common denominator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

What if a frog's butt wasn't water tight? He'd drown when he jumped into the pond.


53 posted on 03/11/2007 7:26:49 AM PDT by Doohickey (I am not unappeasable. YOU are just too easily appeased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

If Coulter were a liberal she would no doubt have gotten an Image Award from the NAACP and received a standing ovation.

It's the only way I can explain Isaiah Washington using the "slur" and being honored and feted by the NAACP whereas Ann Coulter uses the same word and is pilloried.


54 posted on 03/11/2007 8:21:05 AM PDT by Burkean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks
Wasn't it Rush who returned from a tropical island hop with nothing but viagra and male friends in tow? Rush described as a guys get away weekend. But why with viagra? And only men? One could infer what he meant not to imply.

Typical to miss the 'rest of the story' here. . .

. . . he did have a girl friend, post Marta and he did say that the 'good's had been in his suitcase from months earlier. Makes sense to me; as I am forever finding things from 'last trip' in my bag. Often left casually as a 'may need item' and then forgotten. . .So see this as a fair and innoucuous explanation; so why be stupid about it; save to make one's own personal/political point.

And of course, had he remembered; not likely that it would have been caught. While baggage relatively 'safe' per private jet; Rush has never been; particularly in 'Orange County'. . .

And of course, had John Edwards ever been seriously 'diagnosed' as something other than the family man he is; Anne would not have 'gone there'. . .there would have been no reason for controversy.

Meantime; let the Libs just stick to their Nazi comparisons of GW. . .and for that matter; Rush as well.

55 posted on 03/12/2007 4:18:45 AM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks
What if Ann Coulter Were a Liberal and Inserted a Conservatives Name

Then she'd be Michael Moore.

58 posted on 03/12/2007 4:36:49 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Proud Owner, 10K and 20K posts on the "Anna Nicole Smith Has Died" thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

So, a liberal calls a conservative a name!?! Uhm that sort of registers on the "so what" scale. Liberals are always calling consevatives names, it's just we can rise above it and see them for what they are.


59 posted on 03/12/2007 4:37:56 AM PDT by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks
Hitlery Roddamn can call Jewish people "fu*king Jew bastards" and not lose any Jewish votes. Much less anyone condemning her vicious antisemitism. This is the difference between a Conservative making a statement and a liberal national socialist dumbocrapper's rant.
60 posted on 03/12/2007 4:44:58 AM PDT by Lewite (Praise YAHWEH and Proclaim His Wonderful Name! Islam, the end time Beast-the harlot of Babylon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson