Posted on 03/07/2007 8:09:16 AM PST by pissant
@#$%@#&(()!
LOL. Good answer.
I'm confused...it's a story if a homosexual is pro-WOT?
Tempest in a teapot, blown up to Katrina intensity by the MSM!
"[A] good moral character is the first essential in a man... and your conduct here may stamp your character through life. It is therefore highly important that you should endeavor not only to be learned but virtuous." --George Washington
Not sure how they will spin it yet. Most likely to bolster the calls to lift the Don't Ask Don't Tell, along with labeling CPAC as porn supporters
Well, Ann's faggot quip was given more life by the conservative media than even the MSM. I couldn't tell the difference between the two, frankly.
I'm guessing gay porn doesn't fit that description.
Apparently a gay Republican is a "faggot" and a gay Democrat is a "homosexual activist".
Now get with the program. or get in line for rehab.
We should look into his private life? Doesnt sound very liberal.
The funny part is Ann and Michelle posed for a picture with this guy. We will be seeing it all over the blogosphere very soon, I'm sure.
If he's running gay porn, its probably sumthin we'd like to know ahead of time.
If they're gonna parade every photo of Ann posing for photos with homosexuals, we will soon have a gallery of leftist pundits journalists and bloggers. Not to mention political figures and their staffers.
And Malkin is helping to spread the rumors and emulating the tactics of the MSM of using sensationalism to attact an audience. Is Malkin a gossip colunist or a serious journalist?
LOL. So true.
However, one thing disturbs me. Michelle was ALL OVER Ann for making her brilliant little quip. She and other conservatives got the vapors over it. Yet she seems non-chalant over the gay porn rumours, only worried that the left will have a field day with it.
From the tone of the article it looks like she believes it to be true.
"It's only a matter of time before the MSM goes nuts with the story."
I think it's safe to say this is another wrong prognostication on the part of MM.
She a very tin ear for news.
As for it being CPAC's fault for not vetting him, you'd think that some of the people there might have recognized him.
At least their husbands.
"And Malkin is helping to spread the rumors and emulating the tactics of the MSM of using sensationalism to attact an audience. Is Malkin a gossip colunist or a serious journalist?"
Good point.
And good question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.