Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Atlas Shrugged' – 50 years later
Christian Science Monitor ^ | March 6, 2007 | Mark Skousen

Posted on 03/06/2007 2:42:33 PM PST by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-203 last
To: Xenalyte

Maybe you’re thinking of “Atlas Shagged?” :-)


201 posted on 04/12/2007 10:09:37 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister
The Brenie Ebbers and Scott Sullivans or Ken Lays and Jeff Skillings are anomalies brought about by excessive government meddling.

"Society (government) creates the crime, the criminal commits it".

Enron was allowed to happen by energy deregulation that was actually just a shell game.

Enron, under the leadership of Ken Lay, pushed for deregulation. The law in California that structured deregulation was, by in large, written by the industry.

And certainly you must remember the free marketeers claim during the period, that what was need was more time to let the free market work.

I feel that if these governmental watchdog entities didn't exist we would be better off. They just generate a false sense of security until the next fraud is perpetrated.

At a marketing meeting I attended during the corporation's downward slide, a marketing person referred to successful efforts to "manipulate" the press. The VP of marketing interrupted and said, "I told you not to use that word. 'Influence' the press" she said.

The same strategy was used to "influence" private sector stock and product rating.

Again, government is not the only watch dog in town. It does not create a false sense of security alone. It defines criminal behavior and a legal means of holding those who break the law accountable.

We have laws that make it a crime to stick a gun in some one's back and demand his wallet. Obviously that does not stop all people from doing just that, but would you be safer if there were no such law?

202 posted on 04/13/2007 6:59:21 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom
We have laws that make it a crime to stick a gun in some one's back and demand his wallet. Obviously that does not stop all people from doing just that, but would you be safer if there were no such law?

No, but our problem is that government then creates a commission to watch all wallets for attempted demands on them, outlaws all guns to prevent wallet theft and makes rules for reporting every instance of a person approaching another from behind. With these measures government then declares that all wallets are safe for all time.

You didn't refute anything I posted. You basically said that government was in collusion with industry. That only indicts government all the more.

203 posted on 04/15/2007 12:37:06 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-203 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson