Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Worst Supreme Court Decision Ever?
American Heritage ^ | 03/06/07 | Frederic D. Schwarz

Posted on 03/06/2007 11:54:14 AM PST by Borges

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 03/06/2007 11:54:14 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Borges

Roe v. Wade is the worst, resulting in the deaths of 41 million US citizens and qualifying us for the severe punishment that God will visit on our country.


2 posted on 03/06/2007 11:56:15 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

It was one of the worst. To my mind it's a tie with Roe vs. Wade. I'd wager that more blacks have been legally murdered by abortionists than were ever murdered by slave holders, task masters or the KKK all combined for the entire history of American slavery.


3 posted on 03/06/2007 11:57:15 AM PST by pgkdan (Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
As a colleague, Charlie Calomiris and I have written in the Journal of Economic History, this court case initiated a mass sell-off in railroad bonds of east-west running roads because of the sudden uncertainty of whether the western territories would all become "Bloody Kansas." In turn, this sell-off collapsed the NY banks, bringing on the Panic of 1857.

Rarely is such a bad legal decision also responsible for a major economic dislocation as well.

4 posted on 03/06/2007 12:01:17 PM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
I think the Civil War was going to happen even without the DS case.

Roe v. Wade is absolutely the most corrupt piece of work ever inflicted on this nation.
5 posted on 03/06/2007 12:01:43 PM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Gibbons v. Ogden - because it sowed the seeds of the undoing of government limited by express powers.


6 posted on 03/06/2007 12:04:01 PM PST by frithguild (The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Roe v. Wade is the worst, resulting in the deaths of 41 million US citizens and qualifying us for the severe punishment that God will visit on our country.

Certainly Roe and Dred Scott are right up there. I would also nominate Lawrence v. Texas--the "sodomy is a sacred constitutional right" case filled with Justice Kennedy's vaporings. Like Roe and Dred Scott, Lawrence was deeply subversive of the Constitution and the proper role of Courts and the State and Federal Government in the Constitutional scheme.

7 posted on 03/06/2007 12:05:20 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I can think of a lot worst cases than Dred Scott. Dred Scott is a bad ruling under todays standards, but was not out of order for the time period.


8 posted on 03/06/2007 12:05:24 PM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

My favorite "worst" is "Cows Don't Vote" aka "One Man, One Vote." It has resulted in "Rural Cleansing" of red voting counties all over America. Taxation with really, REALLY rotten representation!!!


9 posted on 03/06/2007 12:08:10 PM PST by SierraWasp (Get the Recall petition papers ready for signing up to Recall Arnold in the Feb. 2008 Primary!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Roe v. Wade is the worst, resulting in the deaths of 41 million US citizens and qualifying us for the severe punishment that God will visit on our country.

I think Roe v. Wade was the reason we lost the Cold War. /s
10 posted on 03/06/2007 12:09:06 PM PST by LtdGovt ("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
I can think of a lot worst cases than Dred Scott. Dred Scott is a bad ruling under todays standards, but was not out of order for the time period.

Some people refer to Dred Scott as the case that allowed slavery, and call that 'judicial activism'. The first charge is untrue, the second is true. The Court held that blacks had no rights, that should have been the end of the matter, since courts are not supposed to decide more than they absolutely have to.
11 posted on 03/06/2007 12:11:23 PM PST by LtdGovt ("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
I can think of a lot worst cases than Dred Scott. Dred Scott is a bad ruling under todays standards, but was not out of order for the time period.

A decision worse than one which said an entire race were not and could never be citizens and who had no rights that a white man was bound to respect? Which ones?

12 posted on 03/06/2007 12:12:33 PM PST by Non-Sequitur (Proud owner, 10K & 20K posts on the 'Anna Nicole Smith Has Died' thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Sparf vs US (1895 I think) is the single worst decision. The court ruled that although juries have the right to ignore a judge's instructions on the law, they don't have to be made aware of the right to do so.

It effectively gives total power to judges, prosecutors, and defenders while rendering juries powerless. One notable case where jurors were made fully aware of their rights was the Randy Weaver trial.


13 posted on 03/06/2007 12:15:21 PM PST by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

I agree with you about the Civil War.

In some respects, I'm amazed it didn't happen sooner.

The only thing laws like the Missouri Compromise, etc, achieved was to push back war's inevitability.


14 posted on 03/06/2007 12:17:22 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Wickard v. Fillburn is up there near the top of the worst. That's the decision that gave the federal gvmt. unfettered power. Then again, it was at least kind of sort of based on something actually in the Constitution. Roe can't even say that much.


15 posted on 03/06/2007 12:18:28 PM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I'd call it a tie. Both the Dred Scott decision and Roe v. Wade basically declared that a whole class of human beings had no rights because they were not really human.

If we ever get a ruling finding a constitutional right for the state to mandate euthanasia of the sick, handicapped, and elderly, that will make it a trifecta.


16 posted on 03/06/2007 12:19:37 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Marbury vs. Madison because it gave the USSC the self-proclaimed right to decide what is constitutional and what is not. It took the arbitration of government away from the people and their legislatures and placed it with the courts.


17 posted on 03/06/2007 12:20:30 PM PST by Justa (Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

The worst decision of all time was in Wickard v. Filburn, because it prevents burn-outs like me from smoking weed.


18 posted on 03/06/2007 12:21:32 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf
I think the Civil War was going to happen even without the DS case.

It was the Compromise of 1850, partially repealing the Missouri Compromise, that really stirred things up and led to the foundation of the Republican Party. War at some point was probably inevitable after that.

19 posted on 03/06/2007 12:23:41 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

It was national law at the time, and I think up to 1960 that only whites could be citizens. The ruling had no bearing on his rights in a free state, it was just in the slave states he could not seek federal relief. The rights of people have never been secured under national govt, and this is probably why the framers secured the liberties and rights of the people with them under their own State constitutions.

Yes I know there was some states who would think nothing of enslaving a man because of his color, but no govt is perfect, and if all the rights of men were secured soley under the federal govt slavery would still be alive and well today.


20 posted on 03/06/2007 12:32:49 PM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson