Posted on 03/06/2007 7:32:38 AM PST by 300magnum
Cant seem to trust an encyclopedia any moron can edit.
We had a thread on "conservapedia", I pasted a portion of Bill Clinton's bio which was written by a TOTAL LEFTY MOONBAT.
Either someone has hijacked conservapedia, Schafleys' son is a flaming liberal, or CNS hasn't done any research and Shcafleys' son has no involvement.
Oddly enough, Google leads me to a dozen sites whacking Conservapaedia but no direction to the site itself- search term was "conservapaedia".
This one???
http://www.conservapedia.com/Bill_Clinton
"Cant seem to trust an encyclopedia any moron can edit."
That bears repeating. I don't want an encyclopedia that is slanted either left or right. I want to look something up that still has the same meaning as it did 50 or 100 years ago. This "evergreen" concept is real joke. Look at what has happened to the interpretation of the Constitution.
Why wouldn't these folks just spend all of that time trying to get Wikipedia right? Wikipedia has already set the standard and gets all of the eyballs. I appreciate the effort, but I think it's misdirected.
You could ask Mr. Murdock (sp) why he spent all that money on Fox News, instead of trying to fix CBS, ABC, NBC, etc.
This one???
_____
Here's the version I posted a while ago, if anyone can edit this site, how the hell can it be conservapedia? Lefties can spend all day turning it into DUmmypedia.
I guess someone changed it back.
____
Here is an excerpt from Bill Clinton's biography slamming Bush like a DU-er. (From CONSERVAPEDIA)
Although nothing came out of this investigation, and it turned out that Clinton actually lost money on his investment, one of the results of the investigation was that the special prosecutor turned to investigating other Clinton activities, one of which (the Monica Lewinsky scandal) resulted in an impeachment trial. Bill Clinton managed to serve two terms without botching the prosecution of two wars, manipulating intelligence, engaging in a systematic program of torture, or mishandling the federal response to flooding of a major American city. Obviously, he is the devil incarnate. Clinton also attempted to use the American military to kill Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, an action which was properly seen as a mere attempt to distract the nation from the Monica Lewisnky scandal.
Or they work for congressmen, deleting factual, but embarrassing statements...
Aparently this new site cannot handle an increase in bandwidth.
It is working for me.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
"Oddly enough, Google leads me to a dozen sites whacking Conservapaedia but no direction to the site itself- search term was "conservapaedia"."
That's because you spelled it wrong. They spell it "pedia."
I can't even figure out how to creat an account. log in/create account go to same page. Nothing separate for create.
I didn't try to do any edits myself, but you can see on the bottom of the page there's a thing there to add and edit the site.
Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton (b. 1947) was First Lady of the United States of America during the Clinton Administration from 1993 to 2001. Though she had virtually no connection to New York, she exploited the resignation of the Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan as an opportunity for her to win a safe Senate seat and prepare for her own bid to become President. With the power of the White House she obtained the Democratic nomination for this Senate seat, and then won easily in the heavily Democratic state of New York in 2000.
Bwaahaahaaa!
Wiki sucks... everything is so slanted there...Dums favorite source of "facts"....LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.